No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) comparison

Ivanti and Quest Software are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.
KACE Systems Management App...
Read 40 KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) reviews
  • 5,370 Views
  • 3,061 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

KACE Systems Management Appliance SMA and Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager EOL are competitive products in the enterprise IT management sector. KACE Systems Management Appliance SMA is generally preferred for its favorable pricing and support, while Ivanti offers a more feature-rich set.

Features: KACE Systems Management Appliance SMA provides strong asset management, patching features, system surveys, and threat detection. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager EOL is known for extensive patch management and integration capabilities that ensure seamless operation with other security solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KACE Systems Management Appliance SMA is straightforward to deploy with a generally user-friendly experience. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager EOL offers dedicated support with a comprehensive deployment framework but may initially require more time for onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: KACE Systems Management Appliance SMA offers competitive pricing with potentially quicker ROI due to lower costs and effective resource use. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager EOL may require a higher initial investment, resulting in a longer time before realizing ROI and potentially being less cost-effective in the short term.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
KACE Systems Management App...
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Client Desktop Management (2nd), Endpoint Compliance (6th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (11th), Patch Management (10th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (12th)
 

Featured Reviews

PraveenRajan - PeerSpot reviewer
PraveenRajan
Director of Infrastructure at Elevate Services
Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects
We face some challenges, particularly with non-domain-joined macOS devices. Patching, updating, and syncing with the server can be tricky for them. So, the major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server. If Ivanti Patch had a cloud-based option instead of requiring an on-premises server and software. Hosting it in the cloud would simplify management, eliminating dependence on VPNs or other connectivity issues. Similar to Microsoft's EMS licensing, offering a cloud-based solution like Azure Active Directory or Endpoint Management Suite (EMS) would be ideal. EMS allows us to manage policies, batching, and software distribution entirely through the cloud, minimizing server downloads. If Ivanti considered a cloud-based approach, it would be hugely beneficial in today's hybrid work environment, where employees use desktops, laptops, and various locations. It's not just about patching office PCs anymore; mobile workers and backups need seamless access as well. Cloud-based patching would be much easier in a hybrid environment. Imagine updates coming directly from the cloud instead of relying on individual VPN connections. It would streamline the entire process.
Read full review
AdityaJain - PeerSpot reviewer
AdityaJain
Security Administrator at EbixCash
Centralized software deployment has simplified endpoint control but needs stronger security alerts
What I like best about KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is that it allows pushing custom-made applications to all computers that have KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) endpoint installed. This makes it easier for the organization to push patches and updates. If I need to push EDR updates, I can use KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), as it automatically updates the EDR on that endpoint, and that is a great feature. Overall, KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) helps streamline my processes by allowing me to check the uptime and downtime of machines, whether they are connected to the internet or not, and how long a machine has been switched off. I can also gather hardware details and software inventory from it. I can show a live demonstration if a video conference can be arranged. Incident resolution capabilities with KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) have improved operational efficiency for system administrators, as it makes it easier to track machines with KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), gather their IP addresses, and push several updates, patches, or software deployments at once. I can design compliances as per my requirements, such as ensuring passwords are reset after 45 days.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."
"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."
"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."
"Because of the internet gateway, we were able to get clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint which we needed to do recently when everyone was working from home."
"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."
"The initial setup is relatively easy."
"It also does patch management. At the moment, I'm rolling out a new feature update, 20.8.2, and it's a great challenge because we have to deploy it to 1,200 computers in the home office. We want to do it without interrupting production, but KACE is reliable and it's easy to adapt it to my needs for how and when to deploy the feature update."
"Every year, the system becomes so much more valuable for us; maybe the quality of our service is much better now, the students at our university can use more software, so the knowledge of students using state-of-the-art software is much better than in the past."
"By using the KACE solution, we are able to provide endpoint management for our customers, it filled a critical gap for us, contributes to more than 30% of our revenue, and based on customer feedback it has saved more than 50% time through automation."
"The single pane of glass for managing devices is helpful because it allows me to perform updates and control things without having to disturb the doctors or nurses."
"My primary use case of this solution is to help us obtain accreditation in the UK of Cyber Essentials Plus, a program sponsored by the UK government which encourages UK companies to obtain a certain level of cyber-security within their cyber environment."
"You don't have to be an advanced user. Rather, in terms of ease of use, this product is right where it needs to be."
"We have seen a return on investment from its ease of use, firstly because the KACE appliance is managed almost entirely by me alone."
More KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) pros
 

Cons

"I'm currently struggling with one of the issues related to Linux or Ubuntu. Ivanti does not support Ubuntu and it has a limitation of CentOS to a specific version, which is CentOS 7, not 8."
"Inability to configure a rule-based management."
"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."
"The UI must be more user-friendly."
"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."
"On the patching, the Systems Management appliance, I noticed whenever there is something new that the vendor has to do, he always has to call KACE for help with it."
"The only pain point I have is with their salespeople. They call too often. They're too aggressive in trying to upsell. We know what we need, and we know if we want to expand. I don't mind quarterly calls from them, but sometimes, it is weekly. They need to get their sales team under control. The main goal of their support people and professional services is to make sure they deliver the service, and they deliver it well, whereas their salespeople are so interested in making a sale that they're wasting my time."
"The only pain point I have is with their salespeople. They call too often."
"I would like them to implement VBScript language in KACE Systems Management. Currently, we can only use PowerShell."
"There isn't a lot they need to improve with the solution itself at this point. It is pretty close to providing a single pane of glass for everything that we need for endpoint management specifically on all devices. There is very little that it doesn't provide for us, and for those, we have to go to other methods. There are some of the patching solutions that it doesn't take care of for us. So, we have to do those manually on the devices, and that's really the biggest thing. It doesn't do patching really well for non-Microsoft applications. The major application updates, particularly Windows updates, don't function nearly as well, but, for the vast majority of things, it does just fine. If they could improve in this aspect, that'd be great, but I don't know if they're going to be able to do that."
"There are some of the patching solutions that it doesn't take care of for us, so we have to do those manually on the devices, and that's really the biggest thing."
"Sometimes the information is not as real time as it's supposed to be."
"I think it should have the ability to have the applications automatically update. It would be really helpful if this would override what the user might choose to do."
More KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, it is on the expensive side."
"The cost of KACE has been relatively low compared to other systems. Even if those systems have the same cost, they do not do as much of the third-party patching that KACE natively does."
"The pricing is great. It's billed annually and it's very reasonable."
"Licensing is very straightforward. They don't overcomplicate it. This is not a Cisco product where you have to have 30 different licenses just to open the box. It's pretty much set-and-forget. You pay an annual license... The cost is in the mid to upper range, but the ROI exceeds the outside cost, especially once you've had the system for a while."
"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"We need it, so we have to pay the price. It is what it is. If you need a gallon of milk, then you have to pay the price for it. You don't want to buy the cheap stuff. You want to buy the stuff that is organic and good for your body, which doesn't have all this other junk in it. You want it clean for your body. Quest has done that for our deployment and management systems."
"The pricing and licensing are absolutely fair."
"n terms of pricing and licensing, my advice is that you need to assess what you need and then look at what they offer. It's easy to get caught up in the things that you want, but don't really need."
"Their pricing is per end-point device. There is an initial cost for the license for the server, which is pretty low, and then there is a per end-point device license, which is also fairly low. So, the pricing is still reasonable."
More KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
12%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
11%
University
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise20
Large Enterprise16
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest KACE Systems Management?
In terms of cost-effectiveness, considering a situation where I want to deploy KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) for just pushing updates, it is completely fine. However, apart from that, I d...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Quest KACE Systems Management?
For improvements in KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), I would want to see it become a standalone software agent. I am curious about why it does not offer EDR functionality. Additionally, the...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Quest KACE Systems Management?
I have deployed KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) around 230 plus PCs, and I use it to push Windows updates and scripts. I have designed various scripts for tasks such as password resets afte...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Kaseya VSA vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL]
Compared 15% of the time
GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL]
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL]
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL]
Compared 7% of the time
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL]
Compared 3% of the time
More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Competitors
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
Compared 9% of the time
BigFix vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
Compared 7% of the time
Atera vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
Compared 7% of the time
Kaseya VSA vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
Compared 6% of the time
Fortinet FortiClient vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Fortinet FortiClient vs KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
Compared 4% of the time
More KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL]
July 2026
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] reportDownload Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
July 2026
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) reportDownload KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) product report
 

Also Known As

Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints
Dell KACE Systems Management
 

Overview

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager provides a robust solution for managing and automating patch deployment across network devices. It reduces security risks and improves compliance by efficiently updating systems and software with minimal disruption.

Focused on enterprise needs, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers centralized control over patch management. It ensures that network endpoints are up-to-date, enhancing security and operational efficiency. This expertly configured tool uses automation to streamline processes, minimizing manual interventions and reducing the potential for errors. By integrating with current management infrastructures, it facilitates seamless patching workflows, helping organizations maintain a high level of cybersecurity.

What are the most important features of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager?

  • Automated Patch Deployment: Streamlines the patch process by automating the deployment of updates.
  • Compliance Reporting: Provides detailed reports to ensure systems adhere to compliance standards.
  • Cross-Platform Support: Manages patches for various operating systems and applications.
  • Scheduling Flexibility: Customizes when patches are deployed to minimize disruption.
  • Vulnerability Assessment: Identifies and addresses security weaknesses.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

  • Enhanced Security: Reduces vulnerabilities by maintaining up-to-date systems.
  • Operational Efficiency: Saves time with automated processes and reduces manual efforts.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces the cost of security incidents and management overhead.
  • Improved Compliance: Assures adherence to industry regulations with comprehensive reporting.

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager finds application in various industries, including healthcare, finance, and education, where it supports compliance with industry-specific regulations. By automating patch management, each sector ensures its systems are secure and compliant, reducing the risk of breaches and enhancing operational stability.

Ivanti

KACE Systems Management Appliance offers integration capabilities, efficient image deployment, and comprehensive asset management. It supports centralized management across diverse devices and locations, simplifying IT processes and enhancing security.

KACE Systems Management Appliance provides single-pane visibility for endpoint management, mass software deployment, automated patch management, robust scripting, and detailed inventory tracking. It streamlines IT management and improves cyber-security compliance through remote software updates and centralized IT request handling. Despite struggles with scalability and the need for interface improvements, it enables efficient device imaging, script automation, and network management through detailed reporting. Organizations find it effective for software deployment, asset management, and endpoint monitoring, serving thousands of IoT devices and desktops.

What are the key features of KACE Systems Management Appliance?
  • Integration capabilities: Seamlessly connects with existing IT systems.
  • Efficient image deployment: Facilitates quick and effective distribution of system images.
  • Comprehensive asset management: Provides detailed tracking and management of IT assets.
  • User-friendly helpdesk: Simplifies handling IT requests and issues.
  • Automated patch management: Ensures devices are up-to-date with security patches.
  • Robust scripting: Allows for automation of complex IT tasks.
  • Detailed inventory tracking: Maintains accurate records of all IT assets.
What benefits should users expect from KACE Systems Management Appliance?
  • Simplified IT processes: Centralized management enhances operational efficiency.
  • Improved security: Streamlines cyber-security compliance through automated updates.
  • Flexibility in customizations: Adapts to specific IT environment needs.
  • Increased productivity: Efficient ticketing and reporting ease organizational operations.
  • Remote software updates: Ensures all devices are current, reducing security risks.

In healthcare, KACE Systems Management Appliance is used for maintaining device compliance and security standards. Educational institutions benefit from its capabilities to manage large numbers of endpoints across campuses. In finance, it aids in strict compliance requirements through automated patch management and detailed reporting. Retail sectors leverage its asset management features to streamline operations across numerous locations.

Quest Software
 

Sample Customers

InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District
Waypoint, Mattos Filho, Meetic, Gems Education, Green Clinic HealthSystem, Service King
Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
June 2026
Free Report: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.