Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management and Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] are both solutions in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category. Additionally, 94% of Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management compete in mobile and endpoint management. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management appears to have the upper hand with its advanced features and intuitive deployment, though Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] was known for its competitive pricing.

Features: Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] excelled in remote control, scalability, and managing a wide range of devices, finding robust support in mobile device management. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is recognized for its AI-powered automation reducing manual work, real-time endpoint visibility that enhances security, and centralized device management simplifying administration.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] could better integrate with newer IT systems and enhance its automation capabilities to streamline processes. Its user interface was sometimes criticized for being outdated. Customer support responsiveness needed improvement. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management might improve by ensuring more seamless integration with third-party applications, offering more granular control for specific enterprise needs, and enhancing user training resources to maximize product utilization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] was known for its straightforward and efficient deployment. However, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management offers a more intuitive deployment process enhanced by automation and provides superior customer service support, ensuring smoother endpoint management.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] was praised for being cost-effective. In contrast, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management, potentially with a higher entry cost, promises enhanced ROI through improved performance, reduced operational costs, and modernized management, making it an appealing long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

Anumula Hitesh

Senior Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack

Centralized device management has automated onboarding and improves remote security compliance

One thing I feel Microsoft Intune could improve is troubleshooting visibility. In many cases, when a policy or application deployment fails, the error messages are a bit generic. So, admins still spend time checking logs manually or testing on devices one by one. Compared to the simplicity of deployment, troubleshooting sometimes feels less mature. I also think reporting and real-time monitoring could be stronger. The dashboard gives useful information, but in large environments, many teams still depend on additional tools or scripts for deeper reporting and analytics. If I had to focus on one area first, I would probably choose troubleshooting and reporting. Deployment through Microsoft Intune is generally straightforward, but when something fails, identifying the exact root cause can still take more time than expected. Error messages are sometimes too generic, and admins often have to dig through logs, sync status, or multiple portals to understand what actually happened. I think user experience and policy management could also improve further. Microsoft Intune has become much better over the years, but sometimes the admin portal still feels fragmented because certain configurations open in different sections or redirect to older interfaces. For new admins, especially, it can take time to understand where everything is located. Another thing is policy conflict handling. In larger organizations, multiple device policies, compliance rules, and configuration profiles can overlap. When conflicts happen, the visibility is not always very clear, so admins spend time figuring out which policy actually won or caused the issue.

Read full review

Mahmudul Hoque Khan

Lead Engineer at intelQong Technology

Automation has reduced repetitive endpoint maintenance and keeps our educational devices compliant

Every software has some drawbacks and cons. For Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management, I think the first improvement I would suggest is to simplify initial configuration. The process to make endpoint enrollment, device grouping, and configuration easier, particularly for organizations managing different categories of devices, would be helpful. If the initial configuration is simplified, better workflows for shared computers, labs, faculty workstations, and administrative devices would make it easier to apply different software and security policies without duplicating configuration. For my work, I would suggest one improvement that would make my experience with Ivanti smoother than before. I would want Ivanti to clearly explain the root cause when something fails, such as when a patch deployment or automated remediation fails. It shows the error code, but when we are doing a lot of work, it kind of makes a lot of hassle to read the documentation or ask an AI what kind of error it is facing. My recommendation here is to show the issue, show the full explanation of how it is working, where it failed, and show whether the issue can be safely resolved automatically without needing a third party. I think it needs a lot of improvement. First of all, centralized management and scalability can be improved, particularly the ability to manage endpoint configuration, which would be more helpful for my field of work. Regarding scalability, centralized deployment and policy enforcement can help maintain consistency across larger device fleets without configuring every endpoint individually. I think another improvement would be detailed failure diagnostics, flexible maintenance scheduling, controlled policy rollouts, and clearer reporting on whether the fix will cause any issues.

Read full review

it_user1399731

Chief Technology Officer at Lane Clark & Peacock LLP

Offers scalability and ability to create granular policies

It is a very easy-to-manage and granular policy-based solution. Policies that you can create per device per user behavior are the most valuable feature In future releases, I would like to see more automation or bringing in AI into to understand device behavior. I have been using it for five…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very stable and scalable because this is a cloud-only solution."

"Microsoft Intune is cost-effective and easy to use, so I can recommend it."

"Previously, SCCM was used as an on-premise solution for clients, but now they are moving to Microsoft Intune as a cloud solution with better security and functions."

"The most valuable feature of Intune is the ability to reset a lost device and remove all the data."

"Microsoft Intune is far more efficient and faster than MECM."

"The security posture is very good. It's very customizable."

"The initial setup is not complex."

"Autopilot is one of the best features because we can use it during remote migration and it especially helps in this pandemic situation where we don't need any end-user computing engineer support."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"I can estimate that my team has saved an immense amount of time and resources since implementing automated patch management with Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management, where I now manage tasks that previously required a whole team of over 100 IT members."

"The security issue we had a few months ago really shows how Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management improved things for us; it saved hours and hours of work and hours of research, and we were able to comply with some of the things that the security company was asking us to do within hours, which I believe would have taken us days, maybe even weeks, depending on where the devices were."

"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has positively impacted my organization by being highly effective because now everything is mapped out and managed."

"When comparing Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management with other MDM solutions like Intune, I would say it is on par or better in almost all respects."

"The remote device management feature has helped our remote work strategy because manual intervention is not needed, allowing us to have real-time insights, policy enforcement, and strong security with patch management."

"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"They have an excellent support team."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

"Ivanti Avalanche has reduced the time needed to perform updates on all the devices across our clients' organizations; it's a great time-saver for the client."

"Installing the packages remotely and remote control are the most valuable features. There are around 100 pieces or devices, and the only way to send a package to a device is by connecting to the PC and then manually sending the package. By using Avalanche, we can send a package to all devices with one click. It is very stable and easy to use. Their technical support is also very good. We have implemented this solution for our clients, and they are satisfied with this solution. It does what it is meant to do."

"The most valuable features of the Ivanti Avalanche are the remote control and the file transfer."

"It is a very easy-to-manage and granular policy-based solution. Policies that you can create per device per user behavior are the most valuable feature."

"The solution is easy to work with. I like its stability and flexibility."

"The terminal remediation feature is valuable."

"The most useful feature of Avalanche is remote control — especially the ability to remotely install packages to many devices all at once. When the client has, for example, 100 devices needing updates, it would take far too long to update each device individually. But with Avalanche, we just connect to all the devices through the PC and send the updates out with one click."

Cons

"Unfortunately, Intune’s management extension does not provide the same level of logging, and I lack the visibility in Intune that I had with SCCM."

"Intune could add more features that are relevant to the core application control functions. For example, it would be helpful if it had more control over the on-prem environment from the cloud platform. Greater Teams availability in the Saudi market would also be helpful."

"I think there should be a better tracking of the cell phones used on the Intune."

"Microsoft documentation is a bit hard to get around, so having more control over devices would be good."

"My assessment of the user experience of Microsoft Intune is that it is sometimes good and sometimes poor, depending on Microsoft's infrastructure."

"There is room for improvement in Microsoft Intune regarding Linux and Mac compatibility because some limitations exist."

"When I started learning Microsoft Intune, I struggled because it was not straightforward; everything is in forms and it takes time to understand. The UI is extremely bad; it has a lot of overlapping elements and is confusing in many senses."

"Intune should improve the management of non-Microsoft devices. It would be better to manage Mac, Android, and other non-Microsoft operating system devices within the same Intune interface."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"I have not seen a return on investment with Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management."

"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."

"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."

"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."

"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."

"Customer support is really poor."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

"The solution can improve by adding a kiosk mode option to the devices."

"Its price could be improved. It could be cheaper. I would like to see a better approach for Android and an easy way to send packages and manage devices."

"In future releases, I would like to see more automation or bringing in AI into to understand device behavior."

"There is a lack of flexibility."

"The tool's stability could be better."

"Its price could be improved. It could be cheaper."

"Because our clients are all very satisfied with Ivanti from their side, there is little I can say about room for improvement. However, I think that to stay competitive with other solutions offering a similiar solution, Ivanti could look into making their products more affordable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not expensive."

"While I don't have access to high-level financial information, I believe we have achieved lower costs with this implementation."

"Microsoft Intune is moderately priced. There is a monthly license required to use the solution and it is approximately eight dollars per month."

"The cost is handled through our Office 365 license, so I have yet to be able to compare it directly with other tools in its class."

"While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."

"The pricing is good because customers are not complaining about it."

"The product is relatively pricey, but considering its benefits, I'd say it's fair. The benefits outweigh the expensive licensing fees, especially for large organizations, but medium-sized and smaller businesses may be unable to afford it."

"It's bundled with Business Premium and an E3 license, which is beneficial. If you have to pay extra, it's pricey, but with the bundled package, it's acceptable. They recently increased the Business Premium pricing, which we don't appreciate. The price increase and yearly commitment are causing some problems for us."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"The solution is affordable."

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"Other than the standard licensing fee, there aren't any additional or hidden costs, although I believe Avalanche could be made more affordable in general."

"You will need to purchase licenses for each device."

"It is expensive. Its price could be cheaper."

"Although the solution is a bit costly in my opinion, for customers who really need this solution, Ivanti Avalanche is worth it."

"The license is based on assets. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Construction Company

13%

Healthcare Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	195
Midsize Enterprise	64
Large Enterprise	190

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	35

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

The overall experience with pricing and licensing was good. The transparent pricing based on the number of managed en...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

One challenge we've found here regarding handling problems with Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is actually the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

My main use case for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is opening and managing tickets for the IT area. My team p...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 13% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

SOTI MobiControl vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Aranda Enterprise Mobility Management vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

October 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

October 2026

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

October 2026

Download Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Microsoft

Ivanti

Demo not available

Ivanti

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Ivanti Avalanche is a robust management tool favored by organizations for mobile device and file transfer tasks. Its remote installation capabilities and policy-based management make it a reliable choice for efficient operations.

Ivanti Avalanche supports mobile device management and file transfers, especially in sectors like warehousing and logistics. Its stability and management features offer seamless remote control and package installation across devices, ensuring efficiency in environments such as transport and utilities. While users value its performance and technical support, there is interest in features like kiosk mode and broader Android support.

What are Ivanti Avalanche's most valuable features?

Remote Control: Enables remote management of devices, crucial for troubleshooting.
File Transfer: Facilitates efficient data transfer between devices.
Package Installation: Allows for simultaneous installation on multiple devices.
Policy-Based Management: Simplifies device management through customizable policies.
Granular Policies: Offers detailed control per device and user behavior.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Time Efficiency: Streamlines device management processes.
Stability: Provides consistent performance in dynamic environments.
Technical Support: Ensures guidance for optimal usage.
Cost-Effectiveness: A consideration for improving pricing models and expanding features.

Ivanti Avalanche is utilized in industries like warehousing, logistics, transport, and utilities for managing mobile devices, file transfers, and software updates. It supports technologies such as barcode scanners and thermal printers, assisting integrators in deploying solutions efficiently across client environments.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Frontier Airlines

Goya, Gist, TaylorMade

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Kandji, Ivanti and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.