Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ITRS Geneos vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

ITRS and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #33 with an average rating of 5.0, while Splunk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4. ITRS holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
ITRS Geneos
Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews
  • 4,305 Views
  • 2,798 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Splunk Observability Cloud
Read 76 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews
  • 7,605 Views
  • 4,183 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

ITRS Geneos and Splunk Observability Cloud are major competitors in the field of real-time monitoring and observability solutions. Splunk holds a slight advantage due to its broader cloud-native capabilities and powerful AI integration.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers comprehensive real-time monitoring with minimal resource usage, flexible customization through plugins, and is a go-to in financial services due to its excellent plug-ins for this industry. Splunk Observability Cloud, on the other hand, excels in end-to-end tracing, cloud-native application support, and features strong visualization and alerting mechanisms. Splunk's standout feature is its AI-powered data analysis, which enhances monitoring efficiency.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos needs to improve its historical reporting capabilities, integration with cloud-native environments, and ease of setup. Enhancing its documentation and mobile access will significantly benefit users. Splunk Observability Cloud could refine its pricing structure, improve integrations, and simplify its user interface, as some users find its search and aggregation functions could be more efficient.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos is better suited for on-premises environments with direct customer support, despite a complex deployment process. Splunk Observability Cloud is versatile, handling various deployment scenarios and offering extensive cloud support. Both provide robust customer service; ITRS is praised for its direct approach, while Splunk's broad support network caters to its wide-ranging features.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is seen as costly but effective, particularly valued in high-stakes environments like finance. Splunk’s pricing can be prohibitive due to its data volume-based model, potentially affecting ROI. However, both offer operational efficiencies and reliability. Pricing should be weighed against the specific needs and scales of usage to determine investment value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,346 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
33rd
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
68th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
45th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk Observability Cloud
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
8th
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
6th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 2.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Splunk Observability Cloud2.2%
ITRS Geneos1.1%
Other96.7%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Durai CT - PeerSpot reviewer
Durai CT
Head FM Monitoring at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
A stable, scalable, and flexible monitoring tool
Real-time data is one of the unique features that ITRS Geneos offers. For example, if there is an impact on a particular server and a particular application, I want to see what the impact is or what the CPU or hardware usage information is, as well as the service in the same application. I can see the real-time data and the impact by accessing ITRS Geneos and looking at the tree. I don't want a tool that tells me when something is broken. I want the tool to tell me when something is going to break. That is the difference between ITRS Geneos and other tools. I want proactive monitoring, not reactive. I don't need to be notified after the fact that something has broken. If something is broken, I get a notification by email, and some of my customers are going to call me. ITRS Geneos provides proactive monitoring. The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring. ITRS Geneos not only alerts us but also gives us a real-time view of the data. This is the tool's first great advantage. It is also lightweight and flexible and can adapt to monitor even low-latency systems, which is the tool's second advantage. Another great feature of this tool is its good presentation layer, which allows us to build custom dashboards to present to business stakeholders. This gives them a high-level status of what is being monitored. If we compare ITRS Geneos to other tools, we will find that each one specializes in a specific area, but the ITRS Geneos tool is more comprehensive. This is its great advantage.
Read full review
Dhananjay Dileep - PeerSpot reviewer
Dhananjay Dileep
Senior Software Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Unified monitoring has improved end-to-end visibility and reduced detection time across apps
When we have too many detectors in place for one particular app, such as when I have created 50+ detectors through my account, the entire page becomes a bit loaded when creating the 51st detector, feeling heavy and taking time to load. Additionally, it throws random errors; for example, when we try to save one detector, it might throw some random error which is not even related, with something else being wrong, not that particular error, but the underlying root cause might be different. Sometimes the error is just "some problem occurred," and we are not able to point out what the real cause is. This mainly happens when we have too many detectors or too many alerts in place rather than a standard number. One more thing is in the alert rules; if we have a main general alert, and instead of creating a new detector, we are adding a new rule under one detector, when the number of rules also increases, such as when we have 10 or 15 rules under one generic detector, that again creates the same kind of problem, taking some time to save that particular newly added rule, and it might not save at times, just keeps on spinning. Those are the two drawbacks which I spotted recently; other than that, everything looks perfect.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."
"The ability to logically normalize data gathered from multiple types of sources via pre-built plugins is extremely powerful. This functionality, coupled with the ability to import custom data via the Toolkit plugin allows Geneos to be leveraged to monitor every system in the enterprise."
"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."
"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."
"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."
"The clean and colorful UI and easy to use options like snooze and active times."
"Geneos automatically sends email notifications when any batch job fails, the database is down or the website is down. It is automatically monitoring everything and reduces manual effort."
"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."
More ITRS Geneos pros
"The alerts are the most valuable feature."
"Splunk Observability Cloud has helped me reduce my mean time to detect, and we have worked on around 80 applications last year for one particular client, and since the MTTR has improved drastically, they have given us 245 applications, which is around 150 applications added to the previous number of applications, which is definitely a performance improvement."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the data integration."
"It is a good tool. It allows you to set alerts for application and infrastructure monitoring, and it allows you to create dashboards."
"Splunk Observability Cloud has proven to be beneficial for our organization, helping improve operational performance and company resilience while reducing the costs of unplanned digital downtime."
"The ability to create custom dashboards is one of the best features and that's typically why most people deploy Splunk. Users can create dashboards for just about anything."
"Splunk Observability Cloud has helped improve our operational performance and company's resilience, which was their initial offering."
"The most valuable features include user time tracking and the ability to analyze application load times."
More Splunk Observability Cloud pros
 

Cons

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."
"I would also like to see suggested guidelines to accomplish a monitoring task. The issue is that ITRS is so flexible that there is more than one way to complete a task, each with benefits and disadvantages."
"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."
"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."
"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."
"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."
"They have the Webslinger solution where you can see when something is alerting. It's a little bit cumbersome."
"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."
More ITRS Geneos cons
"A wide variety of logging makes log onboarding difficult."
"Technical support is good but could be improved, particularly concerning the time taken for ticket resolution."
"The price has room for improvement."
"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."
"The feedback is that Splunk Observability Cloud is forcing me to modify my logs that I am ingesting in Splunk Observability Cloud in a specific format."
"Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and process terms. These categories of dashboards would be very helpful for customers."
"Splunk APM's performance could be improved - at the moment, it's very slow and takes forever to give me what I want."
"I would rate Splunk technical support at six out of ten. When we have a problem and need to create a case, the response isn't quick."
More Splunk Observability Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."
"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."
"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."
"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."
"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."
"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."
"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."
"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."
More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice
"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."
"Splunk offers a 14-day free trial and after that, we have to pay but the cost is reasonable."
"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."
"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."
"The product is a bit expensive considering the competition but the company may negotiate the price."
"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."
"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."
"The solution's pricing is costly."
More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
70%
Computer Software Company
5%
Construction Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise39
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise49
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?
The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?
ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?
ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...
See all answers
What do you like most about SignalFx?
The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SignalFx?
Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SignalFx?
The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 14% of the time
Grafana vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 9% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 9% of the time
Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 6% of the time
BMC TrueSight vs ITRS Geneos Logo
BMC TrueSight vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 2% of the time
More ITRS Geneos Competitors
Avantra vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Avantra vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 3% of the time
Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 2% of the time
Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 2% of the time
Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 2% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Datadog vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 2% of the time
More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ITRS Geneos
January 2026
ITRS Geneos reportDownload ITRS Geneos product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Observability Cloud
January 2026
Splunk Observability Cloud reportDownload Splunk Observability Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

Geneos
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring
 

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?
  • Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
  • Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
  • Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
  • Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
  • Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
  • Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.
Why consider this for ROI?
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
  • Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
  • Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
  • Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.
Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara
Buyer's Guide
ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
December 2025
Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.