We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Quality and Oracle Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality."The solution is stable."
"I am impressed by the solution's interface."
"Informatica Data Quality is a product that is worth the money."
"The profiling feature in Informatica Data Quality is incredibly effective for data governance."
"Seeing the data in the mapping itself is really nice."
"There are a couple of valuable features. One is that it is very quick on the profiling. So, you get a very fast snapshot of the type of data that you're looking at from the profiling perspective. It can highlight anomalies in the data."
"The solution is applicable for both technical and business users."
"The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."
"I have found the most valuable features to be data cleansing and deduplication."
"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and maintain."
"With Oracle Data Quality, the most valuable feature is entity matching."
"The features I like most about Oracle Data Quality include extraction, transformation, and validation, which makes it a multipurpose product such as Oracle GoldenGate and Oracle Data Integrator. I also like that Oracle Data Quality is very fast, so you can use it for a large volume of data within a short period. You have to do the validation very quickly, so the solution helps in that area of data quality. Another feature of Oracle Data Quality that I like is the MDM (Master Data Management) where you'll have a single source of protection, and this makes the solution perfect and helpful to my company."
"Informatica is very expensive."
"Their UI needs improvement. Their scorecards and reporting also need improvement. Their data quality reporting, especially their dashboards and scorecards, is lackluster at best. Its reporting capabilities are limited. If you want to do anything beyond its limited reporting capabilities, then you're going to have to use an external reporting tool such as Power BI or something like that."
"One area that could use improvement is the speed of the web interfaces. At present, they are very slow. I think it is essential that we are original and robust on-premises."
"I would like to see better visuals for business users, such as a dashboard where they can precisely track where problems are."
"Although we are very satisfied with the design of the UI, executing tasks with it can be difficult."
"It can be improved in terms of performance and execution. I'm expecting better performance. It currently has some restrictions in terms of execution. For example, if we want to run it in the command mode and execute it, there are some restrictions, and we are facing some issues with a huge volume of data. These restrictions are not there in Informatica PowerCenter because we are able to execute a huge volume of data, and there are more ways to execute it."
"The tool's performance is an area that should be given further consideration."
"There is room for improvement in the Data Marketplace aspect."
"Though validation is good and fast enough in Oracle Data Quality, an area for improvement is the accuracy of the validation. Though the solution offers multidimensional validation, it needs a bit more improvement in the accuracy aspect because smaller products can offer better accuracy in terms of validation compared to Oracle Data Quality. What I'd like to see from the solution in its next release, is an increase in compliances and regulations that would allow it to cover all industries because multiple verticals demand data quality nowadays, and this improvement will be helpful as Oracle Data Quality is an in-built delivered solution."
"If the length of time required for deployment was reduced then it would be very helpful."
"Oracle is currently not that intuitive. We need to use programmers to write code for a lot of the procedures. We need to have them write CL SQL code and write a CL script."
"Oracle Data Quality should integrate with data warehousing solutions such as Azure and CWS Office. For example, having the ability to integrate with tools, such as Azure Synapse and SQL data warehousing would be a great benefit."
Informatica Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Quality with 18 reviews while Oracle Data Quality is ranked 10th in Data Quality with 8 reviews. Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8, while Oracle Data Quality is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Quick on profiling and scales very well, but needs better UI and more reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Quality writes "Fast, has good extraction, validation, and transformation features, and provides good support". Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, Talend Data Quality, Trillium TS Quality, IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer and SAP Information Steward, whereas Oracle Data Quality is most compared with SAP Data Quality Management.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
