Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infor Governance, Risk, and...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Controls Monitoring (9th), GRC (65th)
One Identity Safeguard
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (8th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance and One Identity Safeguard aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance is designed for GRC and holds a mindshare of 0.3%, down 0.4% compared to last year.
One Identity Safeguard, on the other hand, focuses on Privileged Access Management (PAM), holds 3.6% mindshare, down 4.5% since last year.
GRC Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance0.3%
RSA Archer13.9%
OneTrust GRC7.1%
Other78.7%
GRC
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
One Identity Safeguard3.6%
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager16.3%
Delinea Secret Server7.5%
Other72.6%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance?
Share your opinion
Tor Nordhagen - PeerSpot reviewer
Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation
We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?
The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?
The pricing of One Identity Safeguard is fairly priced and cheaper than other solutions of the same enterprise level. It provides a good cost-benefit ratio.
What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?
There is room for improvement in integration between modules. The native integration between SPP and SPS, which is currently based on a plugin, could be enhanced. Customization for lookup passwords...
 

Also Known As

Infor Approva, Approva
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Parkland Health, Denver Public Schools, LL Bean, SEB Group, Hansa Hydrocarbons, World Vision
Cavium
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, Diligent and others in GRC. Updated: August 2025.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.