Impulse Point SafeConnect vs Ruckus Cloudpath comparison

Impulse Point and Ruckus are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Impulse Point is ranked #16, while Ruckus is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3. Impulse Point holds a 0.7% mindshare in NAC, compared to Ruckus’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Impulse Point users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

Impulse Point SafeConnect

Read 1 Impulse Point SafeConnect review

193 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 12 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

962 Views
962 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Impulse Point SafeConnect

Ruckus Cloudpath

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Impulse Point SafeConnect and Ruckus Cloudpath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC).

To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Impulse Point SafeConnect

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Impulse Point SafeConnect is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 2.0%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ruckus Cloudpath	2.0%
Impulse Point SafeConnect	0.7%
Other	97.3%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Chong Dan

Director of Computer Information Services at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees

Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support

A lot of campuses use SafeConnect. It gives us good visibility and enforces policies. It helps enforce network security by scanning devices, making sure they have current and valid antivirus solutions with up-to-date antivirus definitions, and steers our end users by enforcing policy groups and steering them to the right access. Technical support is responsive. The stability is pretty good. It is very easy to scale the product.

Read full review

Gary Koh

Area Manager at Alpha Media Pte Ltd

Has improved network monitoring through intelligent features and simplified onboarding

I am using the certificate-based security feature in the product. The certificate-based security feature helps clients understand what Ruckus Cloudpath can do. Whether cloud or on-premises is used is defined by the clients. They are knowledgeable about the products, so minimal explanation is required. Policy management tools in Ruckus Cloudpath are performing adequately. The integration of Ruckus Cloudpath with our infrastructure is very user-friendly, as the software is becoming more intelligent. It is becoming more intelligent because it is easier to install and implement. Managing IoT devices within a network environment has improved compared to previous versions. The software is more intelligent now, with AI features integrated into their management system. The MMS portion is the best feature in Ruckus Cloudpath, as they can monitor the entire network intelligently with AI features that simplify the troubleshooting processes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to scale the product."

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

"I have found it easy to use with no significant issues once the small initial problems were resolved."

"Ruckus Cloudpath is effective for network security since it points out errors, especially when working with APIs."

"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."

"I find the solution to be very rich in features."

"The most valuable features of Ruckus Cloudpath include its long-range capabilities, smooth and uninterrupted service, and reliability."

"The solution has good features for authentication, policies, and allowing users to self-provision devices for network access via their logins."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

More Ruckus Cloudpath pros

Cons

"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

"The hardest part we've had to deal with is trying to find some physical product recently as everything is going like hotcakes."

"The setup process is a bit complex."

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."

"The main disadvantage is the price, as it is primarily a cost issue."

"There is room for improvement in deployment."

"There is room for improvement in deployment. I would like to see more effort put into troubleshooting."

More Ruckus Cloudpath cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For our tier group, for one year, the cost is probably around $10,000 for the license. If you do multi-year, you could get two years, and you could get it for about $8,000 per year. If you do three years, you get it around $7,000 a year."

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath is on the expensive side. I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

The main disadvantage is the price, as it is primarily a cost issue. The new version coming out, R1, is yet to be seen, though currently, it is running very efficiently. The biggest challenges are ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forescout Platform vs Impulse Point SafeConnect

Compared 62% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Impulse Point SafeConnect

Compared 38% of the time

More Impulse Point SafeConnect Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 49% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 30% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 13% of the time

Portnox vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 8% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

October 2025

Download Impulse Point SafeConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath

October 2025

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Also Known As

SafeConnect

No data available

Overview

SafeConnect provides the ability to automate the enforcement of security compliance and network access control policies (based on identity, device type, location, and ownership), and gathers a wealth of real-time and historical context-aware device data so you can make more informed and intelligent decisions.

Impulse Point

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Aerohive Solution

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

October 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.