We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and Impulse Point SafeConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."The device fingerprinting feature allowed for easy creation and enforcement of access policies."
"There are some features that are working well."
"The features are more expandable."
"The users say that FortiNAC is configurable and easy to use."
"The solution is good at giving a deep dive into each product. It tells you, for example, what is connected to the network. It gives us good reporting tools."
"I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices."
"Fortinet FortiNAC has good user account customization."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the user-friendliness, the graphical interface, and the technical support. The interface is very nice and the customization is good."
"It is very easy to scale the product."
"FortiNAC could be more scalable."
"The reporting capability needs to be improved."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's documentation should be improved because there's not much debugging or troubleshooting documentation for the Fortinet FortiNAC."
"The training from Fortinet FortiNAC could improve. Fortinet has to plan for better training for its partners. Additionally, device management should have more integration with other devices, such as new and third-party devices."
"They need to change or upgrade the technology in the product."
"This solution could be more agile."
"Fortinet's local support could be improved."
"The training documentation needs to be more transparent."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews while Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC). Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.