ImmuniWeb vs OWASP Zap comparison

ImmuniWeb and OWASP are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. ImmuniWeb is ranked #32, while OWASP is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. ImmuniWeb holds a 0.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to OWASP’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of ImmuniWeb users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OWASP users who would recommend it.

ImmuniWeb

Read 7 ImmuniWeb reviews

2,323 Views
1,324 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OWASP Zap

Read 41 OWASP Zap reviews

8,774 Views
8,072 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ImmuniWeb

OWASP Zap

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

ImmuniWeb and OWASP Zap are leading tools in the cybersecurity space. ImmuniWeb appears to have the edge due to better support and easier deployment, despite OWASP Zap's extensive features making it a feature-rich option.

Features: ImmuniWeb users value its AI-driven vulnerability scanner, intuitive threat detection processes, and ease of use. OWASP Zap users highlight its robust penetration testing capabilities, extensive integrations, and focus on advanced testing features suitable for experts.

Room for Improvement: ImmuniWeb users suggest enhancements in reporting features, reduction in false positives, and increased detail in vulnerability reports. OWASP Zap requires improvements in its learning curve, more detailed documentation, and simplification of setup for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ImmuniWeb is known for simple deployment and a responsive support team, facilitating quick implementation. OWASP Zap, while comprehensive in support, needs more setup time, potentially delaying deployment for new users.

Pricing and ROI: ImmuniWeb is favored for its predictable pricing model and strong ROI, especially for small to mid-sized businesses. OWASP Zap's open-source nature offers cost-free access but might incur hidden costs due to the need for skilled handling. ImmuniWeb’s pricing is transparent, while OWASP Zap demands additional investment in skills and resources.

To learn more, read our detailed ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,204 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ImmuniWeb

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Attack Surface Management (ASM) (29th)

OWASP Zap

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of ImmuniWeb is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OWASP Zap is 2.9%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OWASP Zap	2.9%
ImmuniWeb	0.8%
Other	96.3%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Vivek Ashvinbhai Pancholi

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Commendable Solution with Robust Vulnerability Detection Mechanism Suitable for Global Market

The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process.

Read full review

Amit Beniwal

Project Manager at Al Hassan LLC

Simplifies vulnerability discovery and has high quality support

There are areas for improvement with OWASP Zap, particularly in the alignment of vulnerabilities concerning CVSS scores. Sometimes, a vulnerability initially categorized as high severity may be reduced to medium or low over time after security patches are applied. This alignment with the present severity score and CVSS score could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have managed to deliver to my clients the services of Ethical Hacking in less time, with better deliverables, and other key differentiators that make my company more competitive in the local market."

"The initial setup process is user-friendly."

"The ImmuniWeb Platform is the best and easiest way to secure a business online."

"The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others."

"I like the fully automated continuous discovery run by ImmuniWeb in the background. We do not need to rerun the same tests or the same scanning against our resources. We need to supply our IP addresses, domain names, and significant resources with special domain names and URLs, and we need to do it only once. Then we always have an up-to-date picture. I also like the integration with our single sign-on system. We do not need to maintain a separate set of usernames or user accounts. We can plug this ImmuniWeb service into our authentication technology, enabling two-factor authentication. We have secure authentication right out of the box. The other important feature I like is the executive view. You can easily switch from a technical view to an executive view and have a helicopter view of the compliance status. We can see how much effort is required and our current status."

"ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. The solution is highly stable. The solution is scalable. Editing Key Points for Review "Review about ImmuniWeb" What is our primary use case? We use the solution when we face challenges and urgent attention is needed for complex cases from our clients. To address this, we collaborate with the middleware, internal, and client teams to analyze and sort through intricate logs concerning our business cybersecurity program. How has it helped my organization? The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process. What is most valuable? ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. It also focuses on consumer satisfaction and operates in English-speaking markets, primarily required by the UAE, the United States, Canada, and Australia, among other developed countries. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using this product for the past one and half years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable. I rate it a nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? Support is generally excellent"

"After the assessment, you clearly know which assets require penetration testing."

"ImmuniWeb is stable."

More ImmuniWeb pros

"Technical support is excellent."

"Simple to use, good user interface."

"The HUD, Heads Up Display, is a good feature; it provides on-site testing and saves a lot of time."

"OWASP is quite matured in identifying the vulnerabilities."

"The community support that ZAP provides me, as an open source, provides me flexibility and is convenient to use."

"The scalability of this product is very good."

"One valuable feature of OWASP Zap is that it is simple to use."

"The most valuable feature is the spidering because, being a security person, it is very important for me to know each and every section of that application, so we cannot afford to miss any single web page or any single link on a particular website."

More OWASP Zap pros

Cons

"The deployment process on the cloud is straightforward, while on-premise can be complex. Support is generally excellent, although there can be delays in ticket resolution."

"The product’s interface for the web applications could be similar to Android and iOS versions."

"It would be better if they had an automated tagging feature. The tagging functionality currently requires manual tagging, and that's probably the most needed feature from my standpoint. We also do not have enough tools, enough features, or options to display different resources in the way we need. There are basic grouping and some filtering features, but we still cannot fully separate some flavors of our resources. However, we may not be aware of the latest features."

"A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources."

"ImmuniWeb sometimes shows previous scans instead of running tests."

"A great idea would be to make a mobile application for the ImmuniWeb portal so that all information would be available on the go and from a mobile phone as well. It would be much more convenient."

"You may find the dashboard a bit complicated."

"Its technical support could be better."

"The solution is unable to customize reports."

"The product reporting could be improved."

"Without any support, we are in a black hole sometimes."

"We have had stability issues a few times."

"The computers perform somewhat slowly when loading a large number of queries into memory."

"Zap could improve by providing better reports for security and recommendations for the vulnerabilities."

"OWASP Zap could benefit from a noise cancellation feature like that of Burp Suite Professional, where AI helps reduce certain non-critical findings."

"I'd like to see a kind of feature where we can just track what our last vulnerability was and how it has improved or not. More reports that can have some kind of base-lining, I think that would be a good feature too. I'm not sure whether it can be achieved and implement but I think that would really help."

More OWASP Zap cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars."

"There should be the flexibility to change or add pricing, especially for pay-per-use cases."

"The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions."

"It is pretty expensive."

"The platform is expensive if a large development is involved. However, it is less expensive for scheduled-based testing, quarterly or in a year."

"ImmuniWeb is relatively cheap. It's a competitive price compared to other products in the marketplace. It's worth the money we are paying for it."

"It is pretty expensive."

"It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use."

"This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge."

"The tool is open-source."

"It is open source, and we can scan freely."

"OWASP Zap is free to use."

"As Zap is free and open-source, with tons of features similar to those of commercial solutions, I would definitely recommend trying it out."

"The tool is open source."

"This solution is open source and free."

More OWASP Zap pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

That's one of the most critical questions any development team faces! Securing a web application requires a layered approach, not a single tool. Here is a quick breakdown of what to recommend: In...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OWASP Zap?

OWASP might be cost-effective, however, people prefer to use the free edition available as open source.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OWASP Zap?

The improvement that has to be done for APIs focuses on manual activities where the feature exists, but it is not at the same level as what Burp Suite does with intercepting and tools such as Postm...

See all answers

Comparisons

SiteLock vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

NowSecure vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 6% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 3% of the time

More ImmuniWeb Competitors

Acunetix vs OWASP Zap

Compared 11% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OWASP Zap

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube vs OWASP Zap

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs OWASP Zap

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OWASP Zap

Compared 6% of the time

More OWASP Zap Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb

May 2026

Download ImmuniWeb product report

Buyer's Guide

OWASP Zap

May 2026

Download OWASP Zap product report

Overview

ImmuniWeb offers comprehensive cybersecurity solutions with features like extensive asset discovery, AI-driven penetration testing, and Dark Web monitoring. Known for its automated service and customer satisfaction, it facilitates seamless integration with single sign-on and provides detailed reporting functionality.

Focusing on asset discovery across websites, clouds, and networks, ImmuniWeb implements AI-driven penetration testing and vulnerability detection with zero false-positives SLA. Its advanced Dark Web monitoring and efficient threat mitigation enhance cybersecurity posture. Customers benefit from its automated continuous discovery, single sign-on integration, and user-friendly dashboards. ImmuniWeb provides robust vulnerability detection and efficient remediation processes, aiming to enhance customer satisfaction within English-speaking markets.

What are the key features of ImmuniWeb?

Comprehensive Asset Discovery: Identifies assets across websites, clouds, and networks efficiently.
AI-Driven Penetration Testing: Offers testing with zero false-positives SLA for trustworthiness.
Dark Web Monitoring: Detects threats and data leaks from the Dark Web.
Automated Continuous Discovery: Ensures up-to-date information on IT assets.
Single Sign-On Integration: Simplifies access for users.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Frictionless Service: Eases access to security management tools.
Detailed Reporting: Helps make informed decisions with well-organized reports.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the threat mitigation process.
Seamless Client Access: Facilitates access to dashboards for clear insights.

ImmuniWeb is widely implemented in industries focusing on IT asset management, penetration testing, and vulnerability assessments. Its features cater to fast, detailed on-demand testing while monitoring external surfaces for brand risks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for patch verification, perimeter discovery, and dark web searches to fortify defenses against data leaks and impersonation threats. By enabling efficient collaboration among teams, ImmuniWeb helps tackle urgent cybersecurity challenges and analyze complex logs.

ImmuniWeb

OWASP Zap is a free and open-source web application security scanner.

The solution helps developers identify vulnerabilities in their web applications by actively scanning for common security issues.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zap is a popular choice among developers for ensuring the security of their web applications.

OWASP

Sample Customers

Ebay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Amazon 5. Facebook 6. Twitter 7. LinkedIn 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. PayPal 11. Salesforce 12. Cisco 13. Oracle 14. Intel 15. HP 16. Dell 17. VMware 18. Symantec 19. McAfee 20. Citrix 21. Red Hat 22. Juniper Networks 23. SAP 24. Accenture 25. Deloitte 26. Ernst & Young 27. PwC 28. KPMG 29. Capgemini 30. Infosys 31. Wipro 32. TCS

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap

June 2026

Free Report: ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap

Find out what your peers are saying about ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.