ImmuniWeb vs OWASP Zap comparison

ImmuniWeb and OWASP are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. ImmuniWeb is ranked #34, while OWASP is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. ImmuniWeb holds a 0.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to OWASP’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of ImmuniWeb users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OWASP users who would recommend it.

ImmuniWeb

Read 7 ImmuniWeb reviews

2,747 Views
1,538 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OWASP Zap

Read 41 OWASP Zap reviews

9,445 Views
8,784 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ImmuniWeb

OWASP Zap

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

ImmuniWeb and OWASP Zap are leading tools in the cybersecurity space. ImmuniWeb appears to have the edge due to better support and easier deployment, despite OWASP Zap's extensive features making it a feature-rich option.

Features: ImmuniWeb users value its AI-driven vulnerability scanner, intuitive threat detection processes, and ease of use. OWASP Zap users highlight its robust penetration testing capabilities, extensive integrations, and focus on advanced testing features suitable for experts.

Room for Improvement: ImmuniWeb users suggest enhancements in reporting features, reduction in false positives, and increased detail in vulnerability reports. OWASP Zap requires improvements in its learning curve, more detailed documentation, and simplification of setup for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ImmuniWeb is known for simple deployment and a responsive support team, facilitating quick implementation. OWASP Zap, while comprehensive in support, needs more setup time, potentially delaying deployment for new users.

Pricing and ROI: ImmuniWeb is favored for its predictable pricing model and strong ROI, especially for small to mid-sized businesses. OWASP Zap's open-source nature offers cost-free access but might incur hidden costs due to the need for skilled handling. ImmuniWeb’s pricing is transparent, while OWASP Zap demands additional investment in skills and resources.

To learn more, read our detailed ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ImmuniWeb

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

34th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Attack Surface Management (ASM) (30th)

OWASP Zap

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of ImmuniWeb is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OWASP Zap is 2.7%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OWASP Zap	2.7%
ImmuniWeb	0.8%
Other	96.5%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Vivek Ashvinbhai Pancholi

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Commendable Solution with Robust Vulnerability Detection Mechanism Suitable for Global Market

The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process.

Read full review

Amit Beniwal

Project Manager at Al Hassan LLC

Simplifies vulnerability discovery and has high quality support

There are areas for improvement with OWASP Zap, particularly in the alignment of vulnerabilities concerning CVSS scores. Sometimes, a vulnerability initially categorized as high severity may be reduced to medium or low over time after security patches are applied. This alignment with the present severity score and CVSS score could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ImmuniWeb is stable."

"The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others."

"I like the fully automated continuous discovery run by ImmuniWeb in the background. We do not need to rerun the same tests or the same scanning against our resources. We need to supply our IP addresses, domain names, and significant resources with special domain names and URLs, and we need to do it only once. Then we always have an up-to-date picture. I also like the integration with our single sign-on system. We do not need to maintain a separate set of usernames or user accounts. We can plug this ImmuniWeb service into our authentication technology, enabling two-factor authentication. We have secure authentication right out of the box. The other important feature I like is the executive view. You can easily switch from a technical view to an executive view and have a helicopter view of the compliance status. We can see how much effort is required and our current status."

"I have managed to deliver to my clients the services of Ethical Hacking in less time, with better deliverables, and other key differentiators that make my company more competitive in the local market."

"The initial setup process is user-friendly."

"The ImmuniWeb Platform is the best and easiest way to secure a business online."

"After the assessment, you clearly know which assets require penetration testing."

"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."

More ImmuniWeb pros

"The solution enables a person to add the certificate and check the queries, to see if there are any that are undefined, so a person can have a list of the types of queries and can trace them."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. I think it's stable enough. I don't see any crashes within the application, so its stability is high."

"The product helps users to scan and fix vulnerabilities in the pipeline."

"ZAP is easy to use. The automated scan is a powerful feature. You can simulate attacks with various parameters. ZAP integrates well with SonarQube."

"Two features are valuable. The first one is that the scan gets completed really quickly, and the second one is that even though it searches in a limited scope, what it does in that limited scope is very good. When you use Zap for testing, you're only using it for specific aspects or you're only looking for certain things. It works very well in that limited scope."

"The solution is good at reporting the vulnerabilities of the application."

"The OWASP's tool is free of cost, which gives it a great advantage, especially for smaller companies to make use of the tool and at the same time give a comprehensive report with great confidence to the client for helping them in their go-live decision."

"They offer free access to some other tools."

More OWASP Zap pros

Cons

"A great idea would be to make a mobile application for the ImmuniWeb portal so that all information would be available on the go and from a mobile phone as well. It would be much more convenient."

"You may find the dashboard a bit complicated."

"ImmuniWeb sometimes shows previous scans instead of running tests."

"The deployment process on the cloud is straightforward, while on-premise can be complex. Support is generally excellent, although there can be delays in ticket resolution."

"It would be better if they had an automated tagging feature. The tagging functionality currently requires manual tagging, and that's probably the most needed feature from my standpoint. We also do not have enough tools, enough features, or options to display different resources in the way we need. There are basic grouping and some filtering features, but we still cannot fully separate some flavors of our resources. However, we may not be aware of the latest features."

"The product’s interface for the web applications could be similar to Android and iOS versions."

"Its technical support could be better."

"A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources."

"Zap could improve by providing better reports for security and recommendations for the vulnerabilities."

"We get too many false positives and that should definitely be improved."

"The solution is unable to customize reports."

"When comparing OWASP Zap and Burp Suite, the main difference besides pricing is that OWASP Zap has limitations with reporting levels and UI, which affects its reporting capabilities, whereas Burp Suite is already advancing with new AI features and scanning capabilities that OWASP Zap seems to be lacking."

"ZAP's integration with cloud-based CICD pipelines could be better. The scan should run through the entire pipeline."

"There isn't too much information about it online."

"The disadvantage of Zap is that we're unable to customize reports as it only has a single standard format."

"The technical support team must be proactive."

More OWASP Zap cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform is expensive if a large development is involved. However, it is less expensive for scheduled-based testing, quarterly or in a year."

"I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars."

"It is pretty expensive."

"The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions."

"There should be the flexibility to change or add pricing, especially for pay-per-use cases."

"It is pretty expensive."

"ImmuniWeb is relatively cheap. It's a competitive price compared to other products in the marketplace. It's worth the money we are paying for it."

"It is highly recommended as it is an open source tool."

"We have used the freeware version. I believe Zap only has freeware."

"This solution is open source and free."

"OWASP Zap is free to use."

"This app is completely free and open source. So there is no question about any pricing."

"It is open source, and we can scan freely."

"It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use."

"It's free and open, currently under the Apache 2 license. If ZAP does what you need it to do, selling a free solution is a very easy."

More OWASP Zap pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

That's one of the most critical questions any development team faces! Securing a web application requires a layered approach, not a single tool. Here is a quick breakdown of what to recommend: In...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OWASP Zap?

OWASP might be cost-effective, however, people prefer to use the free edition available as open source.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OWASP Zap?

The improvement that has to be done for APIs focuses on manual activities where the feature exists, but it is not at the same level as what Burp Suite does with intercepting and tools such as Postm...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

NowSecure vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

SiteLock vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 6% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 3% of the time

More ImmuniWeb Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OWASP Zap

Compared 12% of the time

Acunetix vs OWASP Zap

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs OWASP Zap

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs OWASP Zap

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OWASP Zap

Compared 6% of the time

More OWASP Zap Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb

July 2026

Download ImmuniWeb product report

Buyer's Guide

OWASP Zap

July 2026

Download OWASP Zap product report

Overview

ImmuniWeb offers comprehensive cybersecurity solutions with features like extensive asset discovery, AI-driven penetration testing, and Dark Web monitoring. Known for its automated service and customer satisfaction, it facilitates seamless integration with single sign-on and provides detailed reporting functionality.

Focusing on asset discovery across websites, clouds, and networks, ImmuniWeb implements AI-driven penetration testing and vulnerability detection with zero false-positives SLA. Its advanced Dark Web monitoring and efficient threat mitigation enhance cybersecurity posture. Customers benefit from its automated continuous discovery, single sign-on integration, and user-friendly dashboards. ImmuniWeb provides robust vulnerability detection and efficient remediation processes, aiming to enhance customer satisfaction within English-speaking markets.

What are the key features of ImmuniWeb?

Comprehensive Asset Discovery: Identifies assets across websites, clouds, and networks efficiently.
AI-Driven Penetration Testing: Offers testing with zero false-positives SLA for trustworthiness.
Dark Web Monitoring: Detects threats and data leaks from the Dark Web.
Automated Continuous Discovery: Ensures up-to-date information on IT assets.
Single Sign-On Integration: Simplifies access for users.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Frictionless Service: Eases access to security management tools.
Detailed Reporting: Helps make informed decisions with well-organized reports.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the threat mitigation process.
Seamless Client Access: Facilitates access to dashboards for clear insights.

ImmuniWeb is widely implemented in industries focusing on IT asset management, penetration testing, and vulnerability assessments. Its features cater to fast, detailed on-demand testing while monitoring external surfaces for brand risks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for patch verification, perimeter discovery, and dark web searches to fortify defenses against data leaks and impersonation threats. By enabling efficient collaboration among teams, ImmuniWeb helps tackle urgent cybersecurity challenges and analyze complex logs.

ImmuniWeb

OWASP Zap is a free and open-source web application security scanner.

The solution helps developers identify vulnerabilities in their web applications by actively scanning for common security issues.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zap is a popular choice among developers for ensuring the security of their web applications.

OWASP

Sample Customers

Ebay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Amazon 5. Facebook 6. Twitter 7. LinkedIn 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. PayPal 11. Salesforce 12. Cisco 13. Oracle 14. Intel 15. HP 16. Dell 17. VMware 18. Symantec 19. McAfee 20. Citrix 21. Red Hat 22. Juniper Networks 23. SAP 24. Accenture 25. Deloitte 26. Ernst & Young 27. PwC 28. KPMG 29. Capgemini 30. Infosys 31. Wipro 32. TCS

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap

August 2026

Free Report: ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap

Find out what your peers are saying about ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ImmuniWeb vs. OWASP Zap report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.