We performed a comparison between IFS Applications and Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Activity Based Costing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The solution overall is very versatile and flexible, especially compared to other products."
"The most valuable feature is the distribution module."
"One of our favorite features is the "Info-Zone", which provides operational intelligence in flight and in context to guide both business users and support teams to productivity."
"The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without having complex functionalities. It's straightforward. Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services. The energy and utility sectors can answer their business needs using the software."
"Some of the strengths are Enterprise Management Solutions and the series of Management solutions which is number one in Gartner's report and has been for the last five years."
"The accounting part and the procurement part are most valuable. It is a very good system with workflows and notifications."
"The integration is a bit complex, and post-implementation support services need to be improved. They have a service center based out of Sri Lanka. The support aspect is good, but the response time is a little slower than we anticipated. In the next release, it would be better if Warehouse Management could be improvised. They have a product line that's a data warehouse management system, but it's still premature and requires a bit of enhancement."
"There are certain digital features that need to be incorporated, such as IOP."
"We would like to see AI-driven CSI functions built into the tool that would allow us to quickly tie our improvement goals to metrics and activities, so Assyst will suggest the next steps to help us get closer to our goals."
"An area for improvement would be transactions, which can be tedious to complete as the process is very complex."
"It would be ideal if, in the future, the product could incorporate IoT and blockchain elements. We'd like to explore more of these types of features going forward."
"Its implementation process is kind of complicated. If the person implementing it doesn't know what he is doing, the system can have many issues. Sage X3 is just an accounting system. As compared to Oracle E-Business Suite, it does not cover a lot of functionality. It doesn't have the payroll, lease management, and HR modules. Oracle E-Business Suite is better than Sage X3."
More Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IFS Applications is ranked 7th in Activity Based Costing Software with 5 reviews while Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is ranked 9th in Activity Based Costing Software with 1 review. IFS Applications is rated 7.2, while Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IFS Applications writes "A cloud-based ERP solution with a useful maintenance module, but post-implementation support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management writes "A stable, scalable, and inexpensive solution with workflows, notifications, and fast support". IFS Applications is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, IBM Maximo, SAP S/4HANA and ServiceNow, whereas Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is most compared with Microsoft Dynamics NAV, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA and SYSPRO.
See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors and best ERP vendors.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
