IceWarp vs OpenText GroupWise comparison

"Its price is the most valuable. It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."

"It has great communication capabilities for team chatting and web conferences."

"The TeamChat feature has been really good for our email management. It lets us collaborate, share files, and invite guests like Google Spaces or Microsoft Teams. I like the two-factor authentication for security. However, they need to improve their document collaboration tools, as their Word, Excel, and PowerPoint features are basic compared to Microsoft and Google."

"It's scalable and stable."

"The solution is easy to manage and includes features such as smart documents and the archiving of user data."

"IceWarp has multiple applications that are easy to use for many people."

"The solution has a very good log-in to the UI when compared to other solutions."

"The groupware module is the most valuable feature."

"Very secure with great storage capacity."

"The cost-effectiveness of the solution is most valuable."

"I like the ease of logging best in Micro Focus GroupWise. I also like its proxy capabilities from a user level. I also like how secure Micro Focus GroupWise is."

"It is difficult to disable user rights on the console so some users accidentally delete their documents or user details."

"Although it is not a tool, video conferencing should be scalable and operate in a professional and efficient way."

"Although the documentation is extensive and in depth, you must familiarize yourself with it before taking full advantage of the product."

"Our customers sometimes have problems receiving mail."

"The exchange compatibility mode is rather limited. Their technical support can also be better. They only provide online support, and there should be some option for escalating."

"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."

"Support should be improved. Most of the time, the queries are not resolved within the SLA."

"The solution needs improvements in security, particularly regarding document management."

"The WebAccess feature is somewhat lacking and could be improved."

"What I don't like about Micro Focus GroupWise is the removal of the Unix client. Micro Focus took that function away about ten years ago because there wasn't enough demand for it."

"Their support can be improved. It is not as good as it used to be."

"It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."

"Price-wise, it's a cheaper solution, without a doubt. Price is the reason we are still using the tool."

"The license is based on the number of users."

"I would rate the pricing and eight out of ten."

"Pricing and licensing is very competitive and in some cases, cheap."

"I don't see any challenges for the Indian market. For example, 1 GB is available for around 399 INR, and 2 GB for 499 INR. They offer a range of plans, from basic to professional and enterprise, with multiple features. IceWarp's aggressive pricing is competitive compared to other market solutions like Zoho and Microsoft. One significant advantage is that IceWarp does not impose user capping like Google and Microsoft, which allows for substantial cost savings and flexibility in user conversion."

"The solution is priced well."

"Costs far less than other solutions."

"Micro Focus GroupWise is the most affordable solution on-premises. Versus Microsoft Exchange on-premises, pricing is 20:1, so there's no comparison. Micro Focus GroupWise is cheaper, though, for my clients, it's not about the cost but the stability and security of the solution."

"It was a part of the suite, so it was very cost-effective. There were no costs beyond the licensing fee."