IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs Okta Platform comparison

IBM and Okta are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Additionally, 93% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Okta users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Read 29 IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] reviews

93% willing to recommend

Okta Platform

Read 126 Okta Platform reviews

25,516 Views
9,441 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Okta Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

IBM Tivoli Access Manager and Okta Platform compete in identity management solutions. Okta Platform appears superior due to its advanced features and cloud-based architecture offering greater flexibility and scalability.

Features: IBM Tivoli Access Manager provides robust access control, authentication, and authorization with strong enterprise-grade security. Okta Platform includes features like strong multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and adaptive security measures, offering a comprehensive suite for identity and access management.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli Access Manager could enhance its cloud integration and offer more straightforward deployment options. It can also improve the modernity of user interfaces and simplification of its configuration processes. Okta Platform could expand its offline functionalities, refine integration with legacy systems, and improve customization options for users seeking more tailored experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli Access Manager's on-premises deployment often requires more time and direct interactions with customer service. Okta Platform's cloud-based nature allows for faster deployment and offers extensive online support, providing more accessible customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli Access Manager has higher initial setup costs due to its on-premises nature but may offer stable ROI over time for existing users. Okta Platform, with a subscription-based model, generally offers lower upfront costs with quicker ROI due to easy deployment and regular updates.

To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Okta Platform

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Authentication Systems (3rd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (3rd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (2nd), Access Management (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (1st), AI IT Support (1st)

Featured Reviews

it_user711612

Senior Consultant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reverse proxy provides central control over authentication and authorization.

It is a single product that caters for all the business needs throughout the organization. It provides a seamless integration that in turn encourages most of the applications to use the SSO features Reverse proxy is the most valuable feature as it provides central control over authentication and…

Read full review

Sravanakumar Nidamanooru

Identity and Access Management Specialist at a university with 10,001+ employees

Automated lifecycle management has cut onboarding times and now drives secure, clean access

Although I am a fan of Okta Platform overall, there are areas where it could improve security outcomes and reduce admin friction. My top improvement areas include the system log and analytics upgrade, which are great for point troubleshooting, but trending and root cause analysis across large tenants still require exporting to SIEM. Verbose queries and long-range retention costs can add up. Additionally, while certificate rotations are better than most, the process is still manual for busy portfolios, especially concerning multi-SP SAML certificate rotations and app metadata drift. Two more buckets of potential improvements for Okta Platform involve user experience and security. There is the issue of push fatigue and prompt sprawl, where users receive multiple prompts across different apps and sessions. I arrived at the rating of eight because the core controls are strong and reliable, but a few operational UX and UI gaps prevent it from being rated higher. The reasons for not giving it a nine or ten include ongoing issues concerning safety and change safety, the complexity of group rules and mappings, and the lack of robustness in policy management. Additionally, there remains a need for more manual involvement than necessary, especially for large portfolios and dual certificate rotation, along with proactive SP data metadata validation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is highly recommended to meet access management and web single sign-on requirements."

"The Verify feature: A push method which customers are going for."

"Tivoli Access Manager (or IBM Security Access Manager) is a fully featured web authentication, sso and authorization product."

"It is a simple-to-deploy solution, with many features that are supported out-of-the-box without complicated setup."

"It is one of the best products in the present market in the area of access management."

"SAML 2.0."

"Provided more secure computing."

"OAuth 2 is now the de facto standard for API protection and scoped authorized delegation. IBM TAM now supports OAuth 2 and can act as fully compliant OAuth 2 authorization server."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] pros

"It is very seamless."

"Okta Customer Identity is a very good technology to work with, with a very knowledgeable support team."

"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."

"One of the features that I have found to be very valuable is its interoperability and compatibility with all types of resources, whether it's networking, infrastructure, or applications. That is, it is compatible as well as interoperable, as far as the federated authentication is concerned."

"My favorite aspect of Okta Platform is that it is really user-friendly."

"We have customers that use Okta Platform, and what they say about Okta Platform is that it's a standard of security, allowing them to integrate the solution to their applications."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"I can say it is more secure, more user-friendly, and integration with applications is easier."

More Okta Platform pros

Cons

"The initial set-up is a bit complex for a novice as the Linux version of it needs you to be somewhat good with Linux."

"I have not tested the stability yet."

"The license model is pretty complex."

"Redundant Policy servers had to be manually configured using LB."

"The whole product could be made into one suite instead of multiple components which are essentially a part of the same infrastructure."

"The profiling element is incredibly robust, but also equally as complex, it requires an off-site course to be able to understand the context or the plethora of options available."

"The pricing is always costly."

"There were endless issues with stability in version 8.0.1."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] cons

"The solution is very expensive."

"The solution lacks an on-premises deployment model so it can't offer a hybrid solution. It would be ideal if clients had options that weren't just cloud-based."

"You can't hide the device when you're checking logs."

"I arrived at the rating of eight because the core controls are strong and reliable, but a few operational UX and UI gaps prevent it from being rated higher."

"Okta Platform's pricing model can be expensive for smaller organizations, affecting user feature accessibility."

"It's not compatible with on-premises installations, unless you host it as a SaaS. We were not able to do that. For example, imagine a scenario where the cloud is not available. Then, Okta will not work for you. That use case will readily fail because it doesn't have an on-premises installation that you can use to authenticate or provide identity and access management. If you have a purely on-premises solution that is not connected to the internet, then this will not work. This is one area that can be improved."

"There were some outages, but I think they were fixed really quickly, so it was not a big deal for us."

"The solution can be quite expensive."

More Okta Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."

"Okta Customer Identity is not an expensive solution."

"Okta has fairly competitive pricing."

"Price-wise, Okta Workforce Identity is a cheap solution. The overall cost depends on the license since you can negotiate with Okta or any of Okta's partners only if you opt for many licenses."

"The product's price is high. For each feature, a certain payment is required."

"It could be a bit too pricey for small companies. Okta Workforce Identity can add a lot of benefits, but smaller companies may not have a lot of applications that need to be managed by Okta Workforce Identity. In larger organizations, there are more departments, applications, and users to manage. Okta Workforce Identity adds a bit more value to those bigger organizations. In addition to standard licensing fees, there are also additional costs for things"

"The solution is not the cheapest but not the most expensive. They are in the middle rating."

"The solution’s pricing needs to be reasonable. You are dealing with a lot of components and the pricing is component-based."

"The solution's pricing model could be better for SMBs."

More Okta Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?

Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?

Currently, in Okta Workforce Identity we get the two-digit authentication code. Instead of getting the two-digit authentication code, if we had an option to do fingerprint verification, that would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Okta Workforce Identity?

I don't have many details about Okta Workforce Identity. I use the tool just to sign in to different applications that we have. We basically set up Okta Workforce Identity in our mobile phone. We d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Idira Identity vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Okta Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 2% of the time

OneLogin by One Identity vs Okta Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Okta Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

August 2026

Download IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Okta Platform

August 2026

Download Okta Platform product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager

Okta Customer Identity, Workforce Identity

Overview

IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.

IBM

Okta Platform provides comprehensive identity and access management, featuring Active Directory Sync, user management, and app auto-provisioning. It ensures security through single sign-on and adaptive multi-factor authentication.

Okta Platform offers advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connection with in-house and cloud applications. Security features are robust, incorporating multi-factor authentication and SSO to prevent unauthorized access. Users benefit from its ease of use and the ability to integrate and manage numerous applications effectively. While generally praised, users note areas for improvement, such as high costs and complex setups. Better integrations with on-premises systems and third-party tools are desired along with enhanced error logging and reporting features.

What are Okta's key features?

Active Directory Sync: Simplifies app management by synchronizing user directories.
Single Sign-On: Provides desktop SSO for easier access to multiple apps.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust security options for different scenarios.
Universal Directory: Supports flexible identity management and configuration.
Integration Capability: Enables connections with both in-house and SaaS applications.

What benefits do organizations find in Okta?

Enhanced Security: Multi-layered authentication to prevent unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines user provisioning and app assignments.
Increased Compliance: Ensures secure access management aligning with IT policies.
Seamless Integration: Facilitates connections with various applications enhancing operational workflows.

Companies across industries implement Okta to secure user authentication and streamline onboarding processes. It supports access management for both on-premises and cloud applications, synchronizing directories and facilitating SaaS services. Organizations benefit from reduced credential management complexity and improved IT infrastructure compliance.

Okta

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc.

FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.

Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Cisco and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.