Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational Service Tester vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.
IBM Rational Service Tester
  • 85 Views
  • 73 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Service Tester and Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,481 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Service Tester
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (42nd)
Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Rational Service Tester?
Share your opinion
it_user375834 - PeerSpot reviewer
It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution​.
The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
July 2025
IBM Rational Service Tester reportDownload IBM Rational Service Tester product report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
July 2025
Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reportDownload Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Rational Service Tester
Service Test, HPE Service Test
 

Overview

IBM Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality is a functional and regression testing tool that enables code-free testing of non-GUI services. Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality helps software delivery teams ensure the functionality, interoperability and performance of service-oriented architecture (SOA) software and web services. Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality helps software teams perform and deliver quality assurance.
IBM

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

IMM, ADP, Bangkok Hospital, Nice Céte d'Azur, Durham Police Department, Whogohost Ltd., Skypicker, Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Getin Noble Bank S.A., KPJ Healthcare Berhad
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
July 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.