No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM Rapid Network Automation vs Stonebranch comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rapid Network Automation
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Network Automation (22nd)
Stonebranch
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Workload Automation (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM Rapid Network Automation and Stonebranch aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Rapid Network Automation is designed for Network Automation and holds a mindshare of 2.4%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Stonebranch, on the other hand, focuses on Workload Automation, holds 4.8% mindshare, down 5.2% since last year.
Network Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Rapid Network Automation2.4%
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform14.9%
NetBrain9.4%
Other73.3%
Network Automation
Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Stonebranch4.8%
Control-M13.8%
AutoSys Workload Automation7.7%
Other73.7%
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Rapid Network Automation?
Leave a review
Saktheeswaran Ravichandran - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Modern workload automation has unified job scheduling and reporting across regions and platforms
I feel that Stonebranch can be improved in certain areas. Since I have been a Control-M user for a very long time and have also used Dollar Universe in the past, creating a task or job and then creating a schedule with time triggers and other triggers in different objects feels a bit complicated compared to other tools in the market where everything is laid out in a single pane and scheduling is easy. Here, since we have a task and a time schedule and time trigger separately from the task, I am getting a bit confused becoming accustomed to those concepts, but that can be managed more easily.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Automation solutions are best for your needs.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
27%
Performing Arts
15%
Logistics Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been straightforward.
What needs improvement with Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
Stonebranch can be improved due to an issue I had a few weeks ago with data leakage, as the servers consume more RAM than usual during continuous file transfers, and this utilization should be less...
What is your primary use case for Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
My main use case for Stonebranch is file transfers, such as FTP and SFTP protocols, where I mostly transfer files from Stonebranch to mainframe, AS/400, SharePoint, shared drives, and S3 buckets. A...
 

Also Known As

Pliant Platform
Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Cisco, Broadcom and others in Network Automation. Updated: March 2026.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.