Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rapid Network Automation vs Stonebranch comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rapid Network Automation
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Network Automation (21st), AWS Marketplace (142nd)
Stonebranch
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Workload Automation (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM Rapid Network Automation and Stonebranch aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Rapid Network Automation is designed for Network Automation and holds a mindshare of 0.8%.
Stonebranch, on the other hand, focuses on Workload Automation, holds 4.7% mindshare, up 4.7% since last year.
Network Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Rapid Network Automation0.8%
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform18.1%
Cisco DNA Center12.8%
Other68.3%
Network Automation
Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Stonebranch4.7%
Control-M19.1%
AutoSys Workload Automation10.2%
Other66.0%
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Rapid Network Automation?
Share your opinion
Siddharth Matalia - PeerSpot reviewer
Good GUI and has helpful support but needs a mobile app
This was a migration project where we provided our database, the previous one, and there was a tool that automatically converted the awarded job into Stonebranch. All the conversion was done from the Stonebranch side, and we got a person as well from Stonebranch during migration. There was a person who worked with us a decade back for the AutoSys install as well. He was well aware of our environment, so he helped us a lot. It was easy. It was not that complex. It is much more GUI. That said, we are looking for how the various automation can be done since, through command lines, you can create a number of jobs. While you are creating a single job, it takes 15 minutes with the GUI, however, if you go for the command line, within two or three minutes, your job gets completed. We have built our own solution for automation using some REST API and all those various integrations. It is working for our organization right now. However, we are requesting some kind of solution from Stonebranch. They should have been providing that to us already. For deployment, three or four people were engaged with the setup on their side. To manage everything, they provided us with a person who required help to manage it. Eventually, since it was a cloud platform on their side, if there is some configuration necessary, which they do it. They get a notification, and they fix it very immediately if there is an issue. The response time is very good from their side, and we don't have to worry about maintenance.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Automation solutions are best for your needs.
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
25%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise22
 

Also Known As

Pliant Platform
Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Cisco, VMware and others in Network Automation. Updated: August 2025.
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.