IBM Public Cloud vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

IBM and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. IBM is ranked #15 with an average rating of 6.7, while Virtuozzo is ranked #22. IBM holds a 3.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.

IBM Public Cloud

Read 18 IBM Public Cloud reviews

2,759 Views
2,593 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews

648 Views
467 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Public Cloud

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Virtuozzo Application Platform and IBM Public Cloud compete in the cloud services market. IBM Public Cloud is often selected for its advanced features, while Virtuozzo is recognized for its pricing and support advantages.

Features: Virtuozzo Application Platform provides agile deployment, efficient resource management, and simplicity. IBM Public Cloud offers robust computing power, extensive integration capabilities, and versatility.

Room for Improvement: Virtuozzo Application Platform could enhance its integration capabilities, expand its feature sets, and develop more advanced computing options. IBM Public Cloud may improve its pricing structure, simplify its complexity for non-technical users, and reduce integration setup times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Virtuozzo Application Platform ensures a simple deployment process and responsive support to boost scalability. IBM Public Cloud provides a flexible deployment model with comprehensive service aided by extensive infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: Virtuozzo Application Platform promotes competitive initial costs and strong ROI via efficient resource management. IBM Public Cloud, although having higher costs, offers promising ROI with its feature-rich offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Public Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Public Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Public Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IoT Platforms (6th)

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

22nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of IBM Public Cloud is 3.2%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Premnath Jaganathan

Product Manager at Uop Ipl

Affordability and security improve our cloud experience while learning new systems

I'm not working with any AI features in IBM Public Cloud, but they are in the process of building it.I am very satisfied with the security that IBM Public Cloud provides. I would rate IBM Public Cloud eight out of ten, where one is worst and ten is the best.

Read full review

Miguel Maloney Thompson

IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees

A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup

It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The availability is second to none. Customer support is very good."

"It is easy to deploy what you need for the initial setup"

"What I like most in IBM Public Cloud is how easy it is to create serverless functions. They are called IBM functions, but in AWS, they are called Lambda functions. Those are pretty standard, and another thing I like the most is that you have fewer restrictions on the amount of data you can transfer across those functions. IBM Public Cloud is way more flexible than AWS. I also like that IBM Public Cloud is pretty straightforward to integrate. As long as you have all the tools IBM provides you, getting everything up and running is straightforward."

"There is no installation for this product because it is a cloud product."

"One of the features that I really like about IBM Cloud is the flexibility where you can order your own hardware."

"It is a scalable product. You can scale it up and down."

"The initial setup was very easy. It's quite straightforward. Deployment took about fifteen minutes. Everything is well organized."

"It's straightforward, has a good environment and is cost-effective."

More IBM Public Cloud pros

"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."

"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."

"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."

"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."

"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."

Cons

"They do not have a very good virtual network implemented, and the VPC is the most important feature that needs to be improved."

"Recently, we just faced some issues with the operating system due to the end of life of CentOS 6...So, then the client wanted to try it out under AWS instead of IBM. In short, it has some complexities."

"It will be challenging to implement if you do not have any experience."

"It could be more secure."

"Support could be improved."

"The connectivity and speed of IBM Public Cloud are much lower compared to the competition."

"The solution needs to be more autonomous. It should let the DL go to allow for more jobs on the cloud. It could have a better interface as well."

"The initial setup and the pricing are areas that need improvement."

More IBM Public Cloud cons

"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."

"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."

"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM has a lesser price compared to other cloud service providers like Azure and AWS."

"The price of IBM Cloud is very cheap compared to competitors AWS and Azure."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."

"It pretty much has a standard price. There is no hidden price with IBM Public Cloud."

"In order to be competitive, you have to commit to a contract for at least one year, but you pay a fixed monthly fee."

"The licensing fees are straightforward and predictable."

"We are using the trial version of this solution, so we have not paid anything."

"Pricing is not as fair as Amazon or Azure."

More IBM Public Cloud pricing and cost advice

"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."

"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud?

The front end is not pervasive, so it is very difficult get the status of your current services or account from a mobile device.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Public Cloud?

The most valuable feature of IBM Public Cloud is the AI integrations.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 30% of the time

Amazon AWS vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 17% of the time

Dell ECS vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Public Cloud Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 28% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Heroku vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 13% of the time

More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Public Cloud

August 2025

Download IBM Public Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

July 2025

Download Virtuozzo Application Platform product report

Also Known As

IBM Bluemix

Jelastic

Overview

IBM Cloud is a full-stack cloud platform that spans public, private and hybrid environments. Build with a robust suite of advanced data and AI tools, and draw on deep industry expertise to help you on your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Your Platform as a Service solution for DevOps hosting!

An elastic, high performance PaaS solution for cloud and hosting providers. The easy way to sell cloud hosting to DevOps-focused SaaS companies.

Turnkey application hosting for DevOps.

Sell PaaS alongside your existing products. The Virtuozzo Application Platform runs on the infrastructure you have today – even virtualized in your cloud or hosting platform.

It makes DevOps hosting fast, easy and cost-effective – and with true consumption-based billing, it gives you a real competitive advantage over hyperscale clouds.

Platform as a Service opens up new markets for your business: you can sell hosting to any company that depends on DevOps for internal or customer-facing IT.

Virtuozzo

Sample Customers

Uvionics Tech, Komsomolskaya Pravda, Alpha Modus, Inventive, Web Business Consulting, FindBrok, SilverHook Powerboats, United Way of Allegheny County

Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones

Buyer's Guide

IBM Public Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Public Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Public Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Public Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.