IBM FileNet vs Microsoft OneDrive comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
6,535 views|3,713 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
5,902 views|4,237 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM FileNet and Microsoft OneDrive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Box, Kiteworks and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: December 2022).
655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of IBM File Manager are workflow, content, and process capabilities."

More IBM FileNet Pros →

"It is simple to use and it allows me to give me the opportunity to access anything I want from any device.""The stability of Microsoft OneDrive is very good, it is reliable. There were multiple instances where I had lost my valuable data on hard drives in several other places. However, with Microsoft OneDrive, I've never lost a single file."

More Microsoft OneDrive Pros →

Cons
"The most valuable features of IBM File Manager are workflow, content, and process capabilities."

More IBM FileNet Cons →

"I think it should be more user-friendly with more tutorials on the full scale of the program.""Microsoft OneDrive could improve because it doesn't support backing up .PST files, which are Outlook data files, and email archives. This is a substantial setback when it comes to Microsoft OneDrive."

More Microsoft OneDrive Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price of Microsoft OneDrive is reasonable and compatible with competitors."
  • More Microsoft OneDrive Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM File Manager should improve the UI. There should be more customization based on the user.
    Top Answer:I have been working remotely for an insurance client and I use IBM File Manager.
    Top Answer:They have support for integration with a lot of tools.
    Top Answer:The security is not as flexible as it is with Dropbox, which means that we can't share our OneDrive files. The price is quite high and it should be reduced.
    Top Answer:We primarily use OneDrive for storing our SharePoint files. Sometimes, we use it for individual backup and server backup.
    Ranking
    Views
    6,535
    Comparisons
    3,713
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    240
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    5,902
    Comparisons
    4,237
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    425
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS OneDrive
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

    There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

    Microsoft OneDrive for Business gives you online storage that works seamlessly with the tools you use every day to create, communicate, and collaborate from your PC/Mac or your iOS, Android, or Windows device.

    Offer
    Learn more about IBM FileNet
    Learn more about Microsoft OneDrive
    Sample Customers
    Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
    Chevron, Accenture, Booz Allen Hamilton, DBS, Nestle, Lowe's, MGM Resorts, Textron, MGM Resorts
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Insurance Company17%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Insurance Company10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company18%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    University9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise41%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    December 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Box, Kiteworks and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: December 2022.
    655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM FileNet is ranked 7th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while Microsoft OneDrive is ranked 8th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews. IBM FileNet is rated 7.0, while Microsoft OneDrive is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "Useful workflow, beneficial content, but setup could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft OneDrive writes "Secure data, helpful support, but more duplication file management needed". IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum, IBM ECM and Micro Focus Content Manager, whereas Microsoft OneDrive is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Box, Citrix ShareFile and Office 365.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.