No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Planview AgilePlace comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.1
IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosted productivity by 30%, improving task tracking and offering valuable insights for scrum teams.
Sentiment score
6.7
Planview AgilePlace eases administrative burdens, supports remote work, and satisfies board demands despite some users' focus on anecdotal benefits.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
IBM Engineering Workflow Management's support is generally good, but feedback varies and requires dedicated management for best results.
Sentiment score
8.0
Planview AgilePlace's support is praised for responsiveness and effective assistance, though feature enhancement timelines can be frustrating.
The technical support from IBM rates an eight out of ten.
Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable, handling small to large projects; updates promise better reporting, though containerization is missing.
Sentiment score
7.3
Planview AgilePlace supports large-scale operations, effective integrations, and agile methodologies, ensuring stable performance and benefiting diverse global teams.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is generally stable, but performance issues and customization challenges affect user experience and stability ratings.
Sentiment score
7.7
Planview AgilePlace and LeanKit are praised for stability, with minimal downtime and quick resolution of issues.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Engineering Workflow Management needs UI modernization, better tool integration, improved permissions, and streamlined upgrades to enhance adoption.
Planview AgilePlace users seek improved integrations, scrum, reporting, project management features, and pricing adjustments for better functionality and flexibility.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
Sr. Project Scheduler at a government with 10,001+ employees
IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure.
Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited
 

Setup Cost

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers complex, costly licensing, yet its effectiveness and ROI justify the investment for many organizations.
Enterprise users find Planview AgilePlace pricing worthwhile, appreciating FLEX licensing for application consolidation and favorable agreements.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Engineering Workflow Management enhances task management with robust traceability, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration for agile adoption.
Planview AgilePlace boosts productivity with customizable Kanban boards, easy work tracking, and seamless integration for enhanced project management.
The capability of IBM Engineering Workflow Management in managing end-to-end workflows is quite robust, especially with the built-in change management capabilities.
Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
Sr. Project Scheduler at a government with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
7th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (4th)
Planview AgilePlace
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 3.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview AgilePlace is 3.2%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Engineering Workflow Management3.3%
Planview AgilePlace3.2%
Other93.5%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

JB
Sr. Project Scheduler at a government with 10,001+ employees
Good reporting for team alignment although connectivity require updates
I would rate the IBM Engineering Workflow Management a seven or an eight. I am leaning closer to seven based on a couple of items I mentioned that I would like to see or know more about, such as improved reporting. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
it_user1695321 - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Consultant at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Adoption across stakeholders, visibility, and reporting make the solution a success
The most valuable features for us are resource management and financial. Before LeanKit, we were doing project management in Microsoft Project. We were able to plan and schedule in it, but we were not tracking resource allotment or the availability of the resources. We have started to track them now. We are able to do this because the reports that go out to stakeholders and the executive leadership team are richer. This helps us prioritize our entire portfolio and decide which projects we can take and which we need to decrease in priority in order to reassign resources to new, priority projects. LeanKit helps us a lot not just in terms of planning internally but also with making outside people understand why a project is getting delayed or postponed or is going on hold. Because LeanKit is so flexible, our ability to make predictions comes down to educating stakeholders on how the cards work. The card's health feature lets us know whether we need to make adjustments. It gives us an idea if, for example, someone has taken up too many tasks.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Insurance Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure, specifically the cost and licensing of this solution.
What is your primary use case for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
The typical use case for IBM Engineering Workflow Management is to streamline project management and ensure efficient workflow.
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
My name is Sofia from PeerSpot regarding my experience with IBM Engineering Workflow Management. It is a leading review site. The solution is very easy to trace. My company name is MicroGenesis Tec...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
Planview LeanKit, LeanKit
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
REA Group, Thompson Reuters
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Planview AgilePlace and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.