Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HCL Accelerate vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HCL Accelerate
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Value Stream Management Software (16th)
IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
10th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of HCL Accelerate is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Engineering Workflow Management1.6%
HCL Accelerate0.3%
Other98.1%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use HCL Accelerate?
Share your opinion
Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
866,744 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
17%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
7%
Transportation Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
 

Also Known As

UrbanCode Velocity
IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, ServiceNow and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: August 2025.
866,744 professionals have used our research since 2012.