IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Matillion Data Productivity Cloud comparison

IBM and Matillion are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while Matillion is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. IBM holds a 2.1% mindshare in CDI, compared to Matillion’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Matillion users who would recommend it.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

1,293 Views
595 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Matillion Data Productivity...

Read 28 Matillion Data Productivity Cloud reviews

3,892 Views
1,362 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Matillion Data Productivity...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 6, 2025

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are competitive solutions in the fields of data integration and cloud services. Matillion's focus on user-friendliness gives it an edge in simplicity, whereas IBM's extensive feature set caters to more complex enterprise needs and often justifies its higher cost.

Features: Matillion focuses on ease of use with its intuitive interface, seamless integration with AWS services, and efficient data loading. It allows for user-friendly ETL operations powered by drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible to non-technical users. IBM offers comprehensive features such as API management, messaging, and event streaming, ideal for complex environments requiring a wide range of capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Matillion could enhance its capabilities by expanding its support for non-AWS platforms, improving its collaboration features to match enterprise requirements, and increasing the granularity of its real-time data handling for more sophisticated use cases. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration can work on simplifying its deployment processes to reduce initial setup times, enhance user interface design to be more intuitive, and streamline its pricing model for easier consumption by medium-scale enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Matillion is noted for its quick and straightforward deployment, complemented by responsive customer service that supports users effectively. IBM, although offering a more involved deployment due to its advanced features, maintains strong customer support to help manage complexity during the setup process, offering reassurance to enterprises navigating its broad array of functionalities.

Pricing and ROI: Matillion provides a cost-effective pricing strategy appealing to budget-conscious businesses with an emphasis on quick ROI due to low upfront costs and user-friendly operations. IBM requires a greater initial investment reflecting its comprehensive offerings, and it represents long-term value suited for enterprises seeking an all-encompassing integration solution.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Matillion Data Productivity Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (27th)

Matillion Data Productivity...

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Matillion Data Productivity Cloud is 4.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Jitendra Jena

Director Axtria - Ingenious Insights! at Axtria - Ingenious Insights

Easy integration and workflow proposals streamline processes

The predefined connectors eliminate the need to write code for connectivity. If you have a predefined connector, it is easy to use with plug and play functionality. The processing time and ease of use are significant benefits. As everyone is moving into AI integration, it will definitely help. When creating workflows, they can propose solutions directly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"It is a stable solution."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"The product is quite stable and can handle complex data integration tasks well."

"The predefined connectors eliminate the need to write code for connectivity; if you have a predefined connector, it is easy to use with plug and play functionality."

"Matillion's technical support is excellent."

"We allow non-technical people to use Matillion to load data into our data warehouse for reporting. Thus, it is easy enough to use that we don't always have to get a technical person involved in setting up a data movement (ETL)."

"The new version with the Productivity Cloud is very simple. It's easy to use, navigate, and understand."

"The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL."

"It's been able to do everything we require."

"Matillion ETL is one hundred percent stable."

More Matillion Data Productivity Cloud pros

Cons

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"The pricing can be improved."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"It needs integration with more data sources."

"When using the SQL loader type there were not a lot of pre-processing features for the data. For example, if there is a table with twenty columns, but we only want to load ten columns. In that case, we can use a security script to select the specific columns needed. However, if we want to perform extensive pre-processing of the data, I faced some challenges with Matillion ETL. I did not encounter many challenges, but my overall experience is limited as I only have three years of experience."

"One of the features that's in development is data privacy in the cloud, along with further SAP integration. For connectivity to SAP systems."

"While the UI is good, it could be improved in its efficiency and made easier to use."

"Ideally, I would like it to integrate with Secrets Manager as well as the AWS."

"In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases."

"There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features."

"The tool's lineage is very weak."

More Matillion Data Productivity Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Matillion ETL is expensive."

"A rough estimation of the cost is around 20,000 dollars a month, however, this is dependent on the machine used and how Matillion ETL is used."

"It was procured through the AWS Marketplace because it keeps things simple. They offer retail-like checkout and bill through your existing Amazon Web Services account."

"The price of Matillion ETL is reasonable."

"Its price depends on what you expect. You pay on a monthly basis, but there is a possibility to have special contracts depending on the installation."

"The prices needs to be lower."

"It is not necessarily a cheap solution. However, it's reasonable priced, especially with the smaller machines that we run it on."

"I have heard from my manager and other higher ups, "This product is cheaper than other things on the market," and they have done the research."

More Matillion Data Productivity Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Matillion ETL?

The new version with the Productivity Cloud is very simple. It's easy to use, navigate, and understand.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Matillion ETL?

While pricing can be an issue compared to other solutions, Matillion Data Productivity Cloud offers discounts and special deals, especially when dealing with high-volume clients or fewer existing c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Matillion ETL?

There are problems with GCP connectivity. Specifically, connections to BigQuery for extracting information are complex, and the optimization of the extraction process requires improvements. I raise...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 37% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 13% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 8% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

AWS Glue vs Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

SnapLogic vs Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

SSIS vs Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Matillion Data Productivity Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

August 2025

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud report

Download Matillion Data Productivity Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Matillion ETL for Redshift, Matillion ETL for Snowflake, Matillion ETL for BigQuery

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud features an intuitive graphical interface, seamless AWS integration, and efficient data management. Its tools streamline complex tasks for SFDC, RDS, Marketo, Facebook, and Google AdWords.

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud provides fast transformations with built-in verification, easy scheduling, and sampling. With automatic scalability and diverse data source support, it simplifies complex data tasks. Users benefit from cloud data warehousing and integrating data into Snowflake while appreciating its ease of use by non-technical teams. Enhancements can focus on frequent API adjustments, improved documentation, faster performance with less latency, and better error handling.

What are the key features of Matillion Data Productivity Cloud?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies interaction for non-technical users with a graphical interface.
Seamless Integration: Works smoothly with AWS, SFDC, RDS, Marketo, Facebook, and Google AdWords.
Automatic Scalability: Efficiently manages varying workloads with scale-up and down capabilities.
Efficient Data Handling: Streamlines transformations, scheduling, and sample data verifications.
Diverse Data Source Support: Easily integrates multiple data sources for streamlined processes.

What benefits and ROI should users seek in reviews?

Ease of Use: Reduces complexity for non-technical teams with intuitive operation.
Performance Efficiency: Fast data processing and transformations enhance productivity.
Cloud Compatibility: Supports integration with cloud platforms for versatile data solutions.
Time-Saving Scheduling: Automates data tasks, allowing users to focus on other priorities.
Scalability: Automatically adjusts to workload needs, optimizing resource use and cost.

In industries such as technology, finance, and healthcare, Matillion Data Productivity Cloud is implemented to streamline ETL processes, optimize data pipeline construction, and enhance data migration efforts. It supports efficient data loading and integration between cloud and on-premises databases, aiding industries in managing data-driven projects.

Matillion

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation

Thrive Market, MarketBot, PWC, Axtria, Field Nation, GE, Superdry, Quantcast, Lightbox, EDF Energy, Finn Air, IPRO, Twist, Penn National Gaming Inc

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Matillion Data Productivity Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Matillion Data Productivity Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Matillion Data Productivity Cloud report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.