No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hyland OnBase vs Tray.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.6
Hyland OnBase enhances efficiency and cost savings by streamlining processes, reducing paper use, and supporting remote work.
Sentiment score
5.8
Tray.io boosts efficiency by reducing redundant tasks, saving 40+ hours weekly, and eliminating the need for engineer integration hours.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
Senior Software Engineer at Infosys
I have seen a return on investment as the company has been renewing the product for the entire 19 months we have been using it, which indicates that trust is high and they likely see value and advantage in using the system.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It has even eliminated a position on our team because that person was no longer needed once we started the automations.
Applications Analyst at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The ROI is clear, as it eliminates hundreds of engineer hours required to build and maintain custom integration connectors, while empowering client partners to manage complex data ingest self-sufficiently.
Dev Ops Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
Hyland OnBase offers responsive service, but support quality varies and may require premium packages for enhanced assistance.
Sentiment score
4.3
Tray.io is user-friendly, reducing support needs; feedback highlights adequate direct support and praised newsletters and updates.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
I have never used the customer support for Tray.io because the software is very easy to use and we never needed to contact support.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
Hyland OnBase is praised for scalability and adaptability, efficiently expanding to support growing business demands despite setup costs.
Sentiment score
7.3
Tray.io is scalable and adaptable, but faces challenges with complexity and data handling in high-load scenarios.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
We were able to deploy it from a small company within Tata with 200 people to what is now a multinational company with 92,000 people globally.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Our company uses it for handling high-volume data ingestion and integration orchestration between our platform and external ad services.
Dev Ops Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
The benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated.
Operations Analyst at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Hyland OnBase is a stable, reliable platform with strong traceability, high performance, and minimal maintenance, akin to Windows.
Sentiment score
7.9
Tray.io is stable and reliable for workflows, despite setup challenges and memory limitations, enhancing data operations and integrations.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
In my experience, Tray.io is stable, as we have never experienced issues with it failing or being unavailable.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The biggest issue we have with Tray.io is that it runs out of memory space and does not process all of our workflows.
Applications Analyst at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Tray.io is highly stable for daily scheduled production runs and event-driven webhooks, provided proper error handling, timeout management, and payload validation are built into the workflow steps.
Dev Ops Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Hyland OnBase needs improved usability, integration, and support, with simplified management, enhanced features, and better documentation and pricing adjustments.
Tray.io poses challenges for non-technical users with complex workflows, high costs, and limited integration and customization options.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns.
Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
If AI could be used more at an enterprise level, since we are purchasing at an enterprise level for the subscription of Hyland OnBase, I would say if those AI informations would stay within the enterprise and not go outside of our enterprise boundaries, it would be secure and maintain our privacy.
Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
When an automation fails, it usually provides the JSON format, and if Tray.io could include a summary of what the actual error entails, that would be quite beneficial.
IT Engineer at a consumer goods company with 51-200 employees
I believe Tray.io can be improved by offering integration with Tableau, which is still not available.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Hyland OnBase offers modular enterprise solutions, with varied pricing and complex licensing, often seen as justified yet expensive.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
Senior Software Engineer at Infosys
No one has complained in the finance department, and it is very rare for Tata Motors to refrain from complaining about pricing.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Hyland OnBase excels in document management with scalable workflows, easy integration, customization, automation, and robust security features.
Tray.io enhances automation with low-code options, robust tools, vast API connections, and insightful logging for improved workflow efficiency.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
The workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes.
Senior Software Engineer at Infosys
Hyland OnBase has impacted my organization positively by faster document retrieval, intuitive setup, reduced manual processing, and comes with security.
Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The connector SDK is also very nice; it has a large library of pre-built connectors that can connect a lot of proprietary internal tools directly into Tray.io, allowing the developer to build, test, and deploy custom connectors using Node.js and integrate the data directly into Tray.io.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
The best features Tray.io offers include the visual workflow builder and HTTP client blocks that enable rapid prototyping and deployment of complex API interactions, including raw HTTP requests, data mappers, and dynamic token generation.
Dev Ops Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
The logging and debugging features in Tray.io have helped us considerably, especially when dealing with APIs that return errors sometimes.
Operations Analyst at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (15th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)
Tray.io
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
19th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (16th), Cloud Data Integration (17th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.9%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase1.9%
Tray.io0.6%
Other97.5%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Abdul_Jabbar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Infosys
Automated workflows have transformed document handling and support daily approvals and billing
The best features Hyland OnBase offers in my experience include being a robust storage solution that integrates well with the Epic solution, allows Unity Forms to be easy to create and use, and has Distribution Services for sending email notifications as reminders.Out of those features, the workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes, and we use Hyland OnBase for legal requests, hardware requests, travel requests, corporate credit card requests, and file transfer requests. WorkView is an incredible module for gathering and displaying summary information, and we utilize it highly in our subsidiary to manage our legal contracts, their financial billing process, and their travel. We also use the Document Import Process coupled with Unity API for writing custom code to automate processes to send and receive data from other systems that are not yet API enabled. The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours. I measured the man-hours saved through the tracking of workflows and automation processes. Additionally, Hyland OnBase has allowed us to move away from moving paper around various departments, providing workflow management to keep approval inside the system and out of the email boxes, eliminating the need for paper storage, and saving storage costs with other vendors.
Amrit Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
Automated student enrollments have reduced manual work and now free our team for higher-value support
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows. Introducing a more intuitive visual interface similar to what we have in make.com right now would make the platform much more collaborative and easier to work with for any non-technical folks or newly onboarded engineers, allowing them to be briefed faster. Visual debugging is another area where troubleshooting complex nested loops can feel very abstract. Having clearer, more visual step-by-step data tracking during test runs would speed up the development and testing process. The pricing model is geared heavily towards enterprise budgets; offering more flexible mid-market pricing tiers would make it more accessible for a growing organization that wants a small start and scale up gradually. The core platform security is highly robust and easily meets our requirements for SOC 2 and GDPR compliance. However, when utilizing their AI features such as Merlin AI with sensitive student data, we maintain a very cautious approach. While Tray.io provides enterprise-grade governance guardrails and data masking capabilities, our internal compliance policies prevent us from passing any personally identifiable student information directly through AI-driven processors. We trust Tray.io's underlying infrastructure security, but we believe organizations must still enforce strict data filtering protocols on their end to ensure student privacy is maintained. During our evaluation, we tested the AI capabilities in a sandbox environment, primarily using it to generate workflow drafts and natural language prompts from web data schemas. Strength-wise, it is highly capable when it comes to translating simple text descriptions into functional workflow templates. It serves as a great accelerator, helping to map standard files quickly and reducing the initial setup time for basic integrations. For issues, in the case of highly custom APIs or deeply nested data structures, accuracy declines. We noticed occasional misinterpretation of complex schemas, meaning our developers still had to manually review and correct the outputs. It is a highly helpful productivity booster but still requires human oversight for enterprise-grade reliability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?
More training videos, if they are more findable, would improve documentation and training documentations from Hyland's side, because there is a lack of documentation and training materials from Hyl...
What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?
As a business analyst, while working on a recent project, I used Hyland OnBase as an enterprise-like document management tool. It was used for storing, organizing, and retrieving invoices regarding...
What needs improvement with Tray.io?
To improve Tray.io, I wish that there was an easier way to download the information of our workflows to have it in some form of an Excel file that explains our workflows that we built, because we h...
What is your primary use case for Tray.io?
My main use case for Tray.io is creating workflows to work with our Zendesk and our other application services. A specific example of a workflow I have set up with Tray.io is that we use our employ...
What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?
Honestly, I am not sure that we have used anything that really shows how AI helps us with Tray.io at this point. We are still at the basic level of just doing the very basics and have not used any ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

OnBase
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach
Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.