Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Honeywell Forge vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Honeywell and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the Quality Management Software category. Honeywell is ranked #17, while Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users are willing to recommend the solution.
Honeywell Forge
  • 60 Views
  • 23 Comparison Views

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Honeywell Forge
Ranking in Quality Management Software
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
BI and Performance Management Service Providers (5th)
Interfacing Technologies En...
Ranking in Quality Management Software
18th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (29th), Business Process Management (BPM) (35th), GRC (21st), Document Management Software (20th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Honeywell Forge?
Share your opinion
SantoshKulkarni1 - PeerSpot reviewer
A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities
I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Quality Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Operational Technology (OT) Security
May 2025
Honeywell Forge reportDownload Honeywell Forge product report
Buyer's Guide
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
June 2025
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reportDownload Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report
 

Also Known As

Honeywell Business Intelligence, Sparta Systems
Enterprise Process Center
 

Overview

Suite of Solutions to Reduce Device Total Cost of Ownership and Improve Productivity
Honeywell devices are IoT windows into business operations, as well as critical assets that make day-to-day business happen. MDM tools and traditional actionable insights are not enough to make a significant impact on reducing device Total Cost of Ownership and ensuring ongoing productivity.

In addition to deep, data-driven insights, the Operational Intelligence suite of solutions enables you to introduce workflow automation that prevents issues before they happen and helps manage issues in real time to greatly reduce IT support costs and negative impacts to productivity.

Honeywell

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?
  • Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
  • Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
  • Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
  • Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.
What should users look for in reviews?
  • Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
  • Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
  • Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange
See our list of best Quality Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Quality Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.