Bizagi vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Bizagi and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bizagi is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4, while Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #86. Bizagi holds a 4.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Interfacing Technologies Corporation’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Bizagi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.

Bizagi

Read 84 Bizagi reviews

7,597 Views
4,026 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

640 Views
230 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Bizagi

Interfacing Technologies En...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Bizagi and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center both compete in the business process management platform category. Bizagi offers user-friendly features and accessible pricing, whereas Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is favored for its comprehensive feature set, providing better value for enterprise needs.

Features: Bizagi offers user-friendly process modeling, seamless application integration, and robust cloud support. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center provides advanced process governance, compliance management capabilities, and sophisticated analytics for process optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bizagi offers a straightforward deployment model with efficient support options, ideal for rapid implementation. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center requires a more detailed setup due to its advanced configurations but provides comprehensive support, guiding complex integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Bizagi has a competitive pricing structure, ensuring significant ROI through its intuitive platform that reduces setup time and operational costs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center, with higher upfront costs due to its expansive features, offers substantial ROI for enterprises seeking comprehensive process management and long-term strategic benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (3rd), Process Automation (8th), Rapid Application Development Software (16th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (7th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (13th)

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

86th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (142nd), GRC (62nd), Quality Management Software (47th), Document Management Software (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 4.2%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bizagi	4.2%
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center	0.4%
Other	95.4%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Fred_Lee

Enterprise Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees

Intuitive toolset engages users effectively in agile projects

I would recommend Bizagi depending on the maturity of the organization. For those just starting, it's a good tool to get into business modeling. In more mature environments, I might not pick this toolset because it doesn't integrate with live systems well. Overall, I would rate Bizagi between eight to nine.

Read full review

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users."

"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."

"The approval process is simple."

"Bizagi is very simple and easy to use, which I find most valuable, as it allows users to create clean and neat process maps."

"The product enables the users to automate the processes and provides a good user experience."

"The user interface is very good, making it easy for business people to understand."

"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."

"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."

More Bizagi pros

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

Cons

"Bizagi needs a way to define categories such as process groups like the APQC framework, PCF, and handle the processes within it."

"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."

"The solution's interface could be a bit more user-friendly and I would like to see more integrations with other Office products, not just Office 365."

"I'm not really satisfied with the reporting aspect."

"Bizagi allows for automation, but it's very complicated."

"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."

"They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation."

"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."

More Bizagi cons

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I used to be very pleased with the pricing. Now, it's a bit more complicated. I don't remember exactly, however, it might be $10 a month per user."

"For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out."

"Make sure that your requirements are explicitly defined from the outset. This will help you choose the right setup and licensing for your needs."

"It is expensive."

"This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."

"The price could be lower."

"The product must improve its cost."

"It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."

More Bizagi pricing and cost advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	36

No data available

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?

I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bizagi?

The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?

Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it. It was less expensive than some of the other tools.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Visio vs Bizagi

Compared 25% of the time

Camunda vs Bizagi

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bizagi

Compared 4% of the time

Appian vs Bizagi

Compared 4% of the time

Lucidchart vs Bizagi

Compared 4% of the time

More Bizagi Competitors

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 48% of the time

RSA Archer vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 27% of the time

Mitratech Alyne vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 25% of the time

More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

January 2026

Download Bizagi product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

January 2026

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Enterprise Process Center

Overview

Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

Bizagi

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

December 2025

Free Report: Bizagi vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bizagi vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.