No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hackuity vs Wiz Code comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hackuity
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Wiz Code
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (38th), Cloud Security Remediation (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (8th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Hackuity is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wiz Code is 2.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Wiz Code2.5%
Hackuity1.2%
Other96.3%
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Hackuity?
Leave a review
reviewer2618736 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Continuous code security has reduced vulnerabilities and provides real-time risk visibility
I have a big improvement in mind for Wiz Code, not a small improvement. When I look at tools such as vulnerability detection tools, I focus on how the reporting could help fast-track risk mitigations. I don't want folks to just look at the severity rating, whether it's critical, high, or medium. I would love to see how that presents a risk. Meaning that if a particular vulnerability is compromised, it could be a low severity, but if it's compromised, what business impact does it have? With capabilities we have in AI and other technologies, I think we could do much more than just sharing vulnerability ratings or severity ratings for folks to act on. That approach is outdated. Something that communicates the value would make sense and could help drive or change habits. That's what I'm thinking, and that's why I say it's a big one, not just something small.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wiz Code?
I have no idea about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Wiz Code.
What needs improvement with Wiz Code?
I have a big improvement in mind for Wiz Code, not a small improvement. When I look at tools such as vulnerability detection tools, I focus on how the reporting could help fast-track risk mitigatio...
What is your primary use case for Wiz Code?
Folks deploying infrastructure with Terraform code need to verify that those deployments do not have vulnerability concerns, and if they do, they need to be remediated, which is the main use case f...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Dazz.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Google 4. IBM 5. Intel 6. Microsoft 7. Oracle 8. PayPal 9. SAP 10. Siemens 11. VMware 12. Accenture 13. Booz Allen Hamilton 14. Deloitte 15. EY 16. KPMG 17. PwC 18. Accenture Security 19. BAE Systems 20. FireEye 23. FSecure 24. Gartner 25.Intel Security 26. McAfee
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.