No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hackuity vs Nucleus Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 23, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hackuity
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nucleus Security
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (28th), Vulnerability Management (40th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Hackuity is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nucleus Security is 3.7%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nucleus Security3.7%
Hackuity1.2%
Other95.1%
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Hackuity?
Leave a review
VK
manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Unified vulnerability workflows have transformed how our teams prioritize and resolve critical risks
While the platform is incredibly powerful, the initial configuration curve of Nucleus Security can be a bit steep. When first setting up complex, multi-layered automation rules and asset groupings, the interface can feel a little overwhelming. Having more intuitive step-by-step visualized wizards or guided templates for building complex triage workflows would make the onboarding process much smoother for new team members. Dashboard customization and reporting would definitely be on my wish list. While the default dashboards are great for a general overview, it can take a bit of manual tweaking when building highly tailored workspace views for different engineering groups. Having a more flexible drag-and-drop widget system where individual teams can prioritize exactly what metrics they see first on their layout would be a huge quality of life update. On the reporting side, the data it generates is solid, but I would like to see more granular control over formatting within the platform itself. Sometimes leadership wants data tailored in very specific ways, and currently, we occasionally have to export the data and clean it up externally to meet those exact visual preferences.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
903,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nucleus Security?
I have a good experience with that, so we don't have much problem dealing with pricing, setup, and licensing.
What needs improvement with Nucleus Security?
Nucleus Security needs a better view into exposure management, as exposure management and attack path management are missing. It also needs better and easier self-service integrations, as the integ...
What is your primary use case for Nucleus Security?
My main use case for Nucleus Security is unifying the vulnerability management landscape, providing a single source of truth for vulnerabilities.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Google 4. IBM 5. Intel 6. Microsoft 7. Oracle 8. PayPal 9. SAP 10. Siemens 11. VMware 12. Accenture 13. Booz Allen Hamilton 14. Deloitte 15. EY 16. KPMG 17. PwC 18. Accenture Security 19. BAE Systems 20. FireEye 23. FSecure 24. Gartner 25.Intel Security 26. McAfee
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Horizon3.ai, Tenable and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: June 2026.
903,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.