Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Grasshopper vs Qrystal comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Grasshopper
Ranking in Hosted and Cloud Based VoIP
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qrystal
Ranking in Hosted and Cloud Based VoIP
4th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

it_user719805 - PeerSpot reviewer
Facade Consultant at a construction company
Gives A Blank Canvas In Order To Create, Automate, And Solve Complex 2D And 3D Tasks
The product gives you a blank canvas in order to create, automate, and solve complex 2D and 3D tasks Interoperability with other programs and inability to file share and collaborate within a team or office. Three to four years. The program can crash when solving complex tasks, however overall…
reviewer2757579 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Project Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real-time insight into voice quality issues has improved customer experience
I use Qrystal for real-time IMS troubleshooting and statistics for VoLTE/VoNR The partner is very sensitive to customer satisfaction and keeps seeking ways to identify any service degradation as quickly as possible. With Qrystal, we can spot any issue with customer voice quality down to its root…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product gives you a blank canvas in order to create, automate, and solve complex 2D and 3D tasks."
"Qrystal stood out during our assessment for voice quality monitoring and proved its value in the first month after deployment."
"Qrystal stood out during our assessment for voice quality monitoring and proved its value in the first month after deployment."
"The product and team have helped us maintain best-in-class telephony service for our users."
 

Cons

"Interoperability with other programs and inability to file share and collaborate within a team or office."
"Qrystal could be improved by including Diameter KPIs."
"It might be helpful to have video tutorials embedded into the product that give you 15-30 second details about certain analytics, etc."
"Qrystal could be improved by including Diameter KPIs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's free."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hosted and Cloud Based VoIP solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Qrystal?
It might be helpful to have video tutorials embedded into the product that give you 15-30 second details about certain analytics, etc. Future version ideas? Would be nice to have a mobile app.
What is your primary use case for Qrystal?
I use the product for monitoring telephony services.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

360clean, Batchbook, Brimtech, Collabo, Everything Happy, FillASeat, Globalme, HomeStars, MOVE Systems, Municibid, Ocasomedia, Rentity, SkinOwl, SoundBetter, Titan PPC, TeamGantt
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Grasshopper vs. Qrystal and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.