We performed a comparison between Google Chrome Enterprise and Rocky Linux based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has been working pretty well for us...By and large, things are pretty stable."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance."
"Chrome functions as a comprehensive solution due to its continuous self-evaluation and improvement. The evolution process has been significant, with a notable distance covered from its inception to the present. Notably, features like VPN support have been incorporated over time, enhancing the platform's capabilities. A distinctive feature is that users don't even need to know the Wi-Fi password; upon signing into the machine, internet connectivity is established immediately. Furthermore, the cloud storage system ensures data isn't stored locally, making it seamless for users to switch between machines. In summary, Google Chrome Enterprise is an excellent solution, particularly when there's a shortage of available manpower."
"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."
"Google Chrome Enterprise is a stable solution with good performance."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"This solution is user-friendly with security features detecting if there is suspicious activity on the browser. There is a lot of extensions we can use to provide us with good coverage."
"The breadth and capability of the various extensions and plug-ins that are out there for Chrome to do additional things on top of just working in the browser are fantastic."
"It helps us keep our workstations in sync and ensures consistent settings across most of our machines."
"It's very simple to work with, easy to learn, and know where things are."
"I haven't needed to use customer service or support, which speaks volumes about their product's reliability and ease of use."
"You still need to have a pretty good understanding of GCP to deploy it properly."
"They need to deal with their memory management."
"The product must improve its speed."
"Chromebooks are hard to find in the Indonesian market."
"The performance could be faster."
"Additional data security and data privacy features could be proactively recommended by Google."
"The solution could be made cheaper."
"Setting up anything resembling a shared inbox is still kind of a giant pain in the solution."
"In terms of improvement, Rocky Linux needs to clarify its identity and target audience."
"The solution's audio integration for virtual machines could be improved."
"One of the potential issues is that if you don't pay for support, you may need to manage certain aspects on your own and rely on the community for assistance."
Google Chrome Enterprise is ranked 9th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 15 reviews while Rocky Linux is ranked 11th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 3 reviews. Google Chrome Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Rocky Linux is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Google Chrome Enterprise writes "A scalable solution that allows its users to create, share and edit documents internally within an organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rocky Linux writes "Very simple to work with, easy to learn, and has a competitive pricing". Google Chrome Enterprise is most compared with Island, Avira Secure Browser, Talon, Windows 10 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), whereas Rocky Linux is most compared with Ubuntu Linux, Oracle Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), openSUSE Leap and SUSE Linux Enterprise. See our Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Rocky Linux report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
