

Google Chrome Enterprise and Rocky Linux compete in enterprise software solutions, each offering distinct advantages for businesses. Google Chrome Enterprise leads in cloud functionality, while Rocky Linux provides stability and cost-effectiveness as a CentOS alternative.
Features: Google Chrome Enterprise offers automatic updates, centralized management, and seamless integration with Google Workspace. It is known for strong cloud operability and compatibility with web-based applications. Rocky Linux excels with long-term support, security patches, and community support. It serves as a reliable drop-in replacement for CentOS and is valued for its RHEL compatibility.
Room for Improvement: Google Chrome Enterprise needs better resource efficiency and improved VPN functions, with more consistent integration with Windows applications. Users desire enhanced AI capabilities and security update processes. Rocky Linux requires better audio integration in virtual machines and broader Windows compatibility. Users see a need for quicker security patch rollouts and more effective documentation, along with improved marketing strategies.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Chrome Enterprise is primarily deployed in public cloud settings, offering flexibility and comprehensive documentation. Customer support is responsive but can experience delays through resellers. Rocky Linux integrates well with hybrid and private clouds, known for stable on-premises deployment. Community support simplifies its deployment, although documentation and customer service could be expanded.
Pricing and ROI: Google Chrome Enterprise presents a strong ROI by reducing infrastructure costs, appealing to organizations that favor using older devices. Educational and non-profit entities may receive financial benefits, but regional pricing variations can be a concern. Rocky Linux, often free or competitively priced as an open-source solution, is notable for its cost-effectiveness and absence of licensing fees, offering significant financial advantages for cost-sensitive organizations.
When it comes to return on investment, a lot of money is saved since we moved from a purchased license to the open source provided by Rocky Linux.
ROI has been good as we have significant open source community involvement.
I have seen a return on investment since there was definitely money saved at the time due to the lack of need for licensing since Rocky is available openly.
The online support often redirects us to FAQs instead of connecting to a real person.
There could be more detailed guidance on new installations like Google Authenticator, as the process is often vague and lacks fine-tuned information.
There are features regarding QR code setup, compatibility, and security.
The support level is extraordinary, providing on-time assistance.
We have not yet needed to contact a vendor regarding Rocky Linux.
Even if we raise a support ticket, we receive a resolution or a reply from the team within two business days.
Firefox is slightly more efficient as it uses less memory.
I would just need to move the container I have set up on Cloud Run to a VM or cluster, which could be straightforward.
Even if the server is not responding and we want to attach the volume on another instance or a temporary instance, it is very easy and straightforward with no hiccups.
It has handled growth or changing needs well.
The scalability is quite good, though there are some issues with Rocky Linux.
I consider Google Chrome Enterprise to be both stable and scalable.
Google Chrome Enterprise is stable, and I haven't faced any stability problems.
Rocky Linux is stable, scalable, and it is very much easier to use.
Rocky Linux is stable.
If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system.
This causes hesitation in installing them due to concerns about hidden costs and inadequate information.
Regarding Google Chrome Enterprise improvements, they need to declare some security details; they are applying security but not publishing the details about the security applied.
It is based on customer requirements, as they might want to use Rocky Linux or Ubuntu, depending on their needs.
Rocky Linux could be improved by having more integration with Kubernetes.
Currently, it takes more than one month to release a new package or kernel, so speeding that up would help reduce reported vulnerability remediations.
It's a bit on the higher side, but we prefer to stick with it because of the security, ease of maintenance, and the company's reputation.
The interface is optimized in terms of the UI and user experience.
We switched to Rocky Linux because of the license price, and in our business, we don't need to have a higher cost as that is not a good idea.
There is no extra cost for a license if we are purchasing Rocky Linux from the AWS Marketplace.
Rocky Linux is free, and I can download it and deploy it in whatever environment I have, whether it be H3C, VMware, or Hyper-V.
The best aspects of Google Chrome Enterprise are its compatibility with everything, smooth management, and frequent security patching, which I find nice to use.
The security it offers is an advantage, which is crucial for us due to HIPAA compliance concerns.
Google Chrome Enterprise is my preferred browser over Firefox and Microsoft Edge.
Rocky Linux has positively impacted my organization, specifically through cost savings, because we did not have to buy any licenses or extra licenses of other distros, such as Oracle or Red Hat.
For production deployment, Rocky Linux is a great choice because it offers full RHEL compatibility without licensing costs, along with strong community support.
Since migrating to Rocky Linux, I've seen specific outcomes such as improved security because CentOS stopped the project, and security patches aren't being released.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Rocky Linux | 12.2% |
| Google Chrome Enterprise | 0.6% |
| Other | 87.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Google Chrome Enterprise combines Chrome OS and Chrome Browser to enable work in the cloud. Manage users’ access to data, applications, and extensions without breaking a sweat. Work securely from anywhere, on any device. Your data is kept safe in the cloud.
Rocky Linux provides enterprise-grade stability and seamless Red Hat compatibility, coupled with extensive community support. Known for easy setup and minimal maintenance, its open-source nature ensures cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for critical systems.
Rocky Linux is an open-source operating system valued for its compatibility with Red Hat Enterprise Linux, making it an attractive choice for organizations migrating from CentOS. It focuses on stability, security, and long-term support, crucial for critical systems. Users benefit from seamless integration with automation tools and its strong community backing. While it offers ease of setup and package availability, areas like software availability and faster updates need enhancement. The system's UX design supports productivity, with potential improvements in documentation and security integration helping to maintain competitive advantages.
What Are the Key Features?Rocky Linux is widely implemented across numerous industries as a server platform and backend OS, supporting web hosting, big data projects, and cloud infrastructure. Companies in IT environments like Nutanix data centers and high-performance computing choose it for its compatibility with open-source tools, making it favored for automation with Ansible and monitoring through Prometheus.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.