We performed a comparison between GoodAccess and Ivanti Secure Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"Their user interface is intuitive as it is easy to navigate."
"This simple, stable, affordable VPN solution scaled with us over the first year of use, allowing for an expansion of remote/hybrid workers to remotely access key systems otherwise restricted to our internal office network."
"No extra hardware is needed, and it is very easy to set up"
"The solution has easy-to-use administration and offers an easy implementation."
"GoodAccess is allowing us to give first-hand support and access to critical client systems, in a secure way."
"We love the simple interface and speed and reliability of the system."
"GoodAccess VPN has brought a transformative shift to our organization, notably enhancing collaboration and enabling seamless remote work."
"Static IP Addresses with multiple gateway options per team allow us to set up different teams with different network accesses."
"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."
"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Adding one user at a time to the package as compared to blocks of five would be helpful. Currently, we end up with empty seats on our plans."
"Enhancing the user interface and experience could make it more intuitive for all users."
"The latest upgrade to the Windows version of the app (unconfirmed on the Mac client) adds some unnecessary stylized animation to the GUI."
"This past year, I did not like having to purchase an upgrade to a plan with a minimum number of seats to get the features we needed. We do not use all of the seats."
"There could be a better view of which type of communication is going through the system."
"The interface could provide more extensive information regarding the occurrence of threats. Currently, it only displays rudimentary threat data."
"The product could improve by extending its chat support beyond 8-5 CET, Monday to Friday, to a 24/7 service for better accessibility and immediate assistance."
"There is one minor drawback to mention: occasionally, the Internet connection tends to slow down noticeably while using the VPN."
"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."
"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."
GoodAccess is ranked 10th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 19 reviews while Ivanti Secure Access is ranked 27th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews. GoodAccess is rated 9.2, while Ivanti Secure Access is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of GoodAccess writes "Robust, allows for remote work, and has comprehensive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Secure Access writes "Integrates well, highly reliable, but lacking reporting". GoodAccess is most compared with , whereas Ivanti Secure Access is most compared with Ivanti Connect Secure, Tailscale, NetMotion Mobility, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. See our GoodAccess vs. Ivanti Secure Access report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
