Gluu Flex vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

Gluu Inc and IBM are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Gluu Inc is ranked #13 with an average rating of 10.0, while IBM is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Gluu Inc holds a 1.1% mindshare in IAMS, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gluu Inc users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Gluu Flex

Read 2 Gluu Flex reviews

502 Views
236 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 8 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

1,592 Views
653 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Gluu Flex

IBM Security Verify Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

IBM Security Verify Access and Gluu Flex compete in the identity and access management arena. IBM Security Verify Access has an edge in deployment agility and customer support, while Gluu Flex is favored for its feature richness appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive capabilities.

Features: IBM Security Verify Access offers robust multi-factor authentication, adaptive access management, and integration capabilities. Gluu Flex stands out for its extensive customization, seamless scalability, and open-source flexibility, allowing for tailored solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Verify Access provides a streamlined deployment process with comprehensive customer support. Gluu Flex offers a flexible approach with cloud-based or on-premise deployment options, although it may demand additional client-side resources for optimal implementation and upkeep.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Verify Access requires a higher initial investment, yielding a strong long-term ROI due to its enterprise-grade offerings. Gluu Flex is positioned as a cost-effective choice with lower upfront costs, especially appealing for organizations taking advantage of its customizable, scalable open-source model.

To learn more, read our detailed Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,513 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gluu Flex

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

13th

Ranking in Access Management

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

14th

Ranking in Access Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (13th), Identity Management (IM) (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Gluu Flex is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 2.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Gluu Flex	1.1%
IBM Security Verify Access	2.4%
Other	96.5%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

EtienneVenter

Owner at Process2product

Facilitates improvement through feedback collection, quizzes, and event data generation

Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system. Gluu filters and displays relevant information based on the user's role in the processes. Users can set it up to view as a viewer, worker, manager, or controller of the area. The front end offers different views but provides an easy dashboard for employees. On the dashboard, users can configure it to show tasks, related work instructions, and connected processes. It's very user-friendly, allowing end-users to understand their tasks and processes without needing in-depth knowledge.

Read full review

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most of the features are related to banking within this particular IT industry. Security and the market are also important features."

"Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system."

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"IBM Security Verify Access, formerly known as ISAM, IBM Security Access Manager, now renamed to ISVA, integrates with central directory services for our organization and provides user management functionality."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

Cons

"The tool integrates AI into the process modeling aspect. I believe this addition will significantly enhance usability. Additionally, it might be beneficial to have the capability to import content from other tools into this platform. Our platform follows its business process modeling notation standard, which differs from BPM. It uses a simpler notation, making it easier. The ability to import content from other tools could accommodate users accustomed to different standards."

"I would like to see features around federation, authentication, authorization, and AI APIs with a ChatGPT interface."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable."

"The tool is cheaper compared to typical German products. I rate the product’s pricing a four out of ten."

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,513 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

47%

Government

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Insurance Company

14%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Gluu?

Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gluu?

The tool is cheaper compared to typical German products. I rate the product’s pricing a four out of ten. The cost depends on the model you choose. If you go bigger, like a thousand or more users, t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gluu?

The tool integrates AI into the process modeling aspect. I believe this addition will significantly enhance usability. Additionally, it might be beneficial to have the capability to import content ...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?

The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Workforce Identity vs Gluu Flex

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Gluu Flex

Compared 20% of the time

OpenIAM Access Manager vs Gluu Flex

Compared 20% of the time

Auth0 vs Gluu Flex

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Gluu Flex

Compared 18% of the time

More Gluu Flex Competitors

Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 14% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Access Management

September 2025

Download Gluu Flex product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

September 2025

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Overview

Gluu Flex is an enterprise-level tool designed for identity and access management, offering advanced security and flexibility tailored to meet demanding IT environments. Focusing on high-performance capabilities, Gluu Flex caters to complex authentication needs for businesses.

This platform provides scalable solutions for businesses looking to integrate efficient identity management. It is designed with adaptability in mind, enabling seamless integration with existing infrastructure. The core features support a robust authentication framework that ensures secure user access across IT systems. With the flexibility to handle complex configurations and provide comprehensive support, it meets the modern demands businesses face.

What are the key features of Gluu Flex?

Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs without compromising performance.
Advanced Authentication: Supports multifactor authentication for enhanced security.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT environments.
Comprehensive Support: Offers thorough documentation and responsive customer service.

What benefits should you expect from using Gluu Flex?

Enhanced Security: Delivers robust protection against unauthorized access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces overhead by streamlining identity management processes.
Operational Agility: Provides faster response to evolving IT requirements.
Increased Compliance: Ensures alignment with regulatory standards for data protection.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Gluu Flex is implemented to safeguard sensitive information and streamline access management. Its ability to offer bespoke security solutions makes it a preferred choice for sectors with stringent compliance needs, allowing businesses to achieve greater efficiency and control.

Gluu Inc

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM

Sample Customers

Dubai Municipality

POST Luxembourg

Buyer's Guide

Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access

September 2025

Free Report: Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,513 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.