Gloo Platform vs MuleSoft API Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Solo.io and Salesforce are both solutions in the API Management category. Solo.io is ranked #23 with an average rating of 10.0, while Salesforce is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8. Solo.io holds a 0.8% mindshare in APIM, compared to Salesforce’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Solo.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Gloo Platform

Read 3 Gloo Platform reviews

1,129 Views
1,129 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft API Manager

Read 60 MuleSoft API Manager reviews

8,834 Views
8,746 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Gloo Platform

MuleSoft API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gloo Platform and MuleSoft API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gloo Platform

Ranking in API Management

23rd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft API Manager

Ranking in API Management

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Gloo Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft API Manager is 3.8%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MuleSoft API Manager	3.8%
Gloo Platform	0.8%
Other	95.4%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Hiten Nandasana

Angular developer at Flourish software

Centralized traffic control has improved monitoring and simplified our Kubernetes API management

Gloo Platform features include Kubernetes-native API gateways, routing control, API routing, and seamless integration with various environments. It supports multi-clusters and hybrid cloud deployments, which are the most valuable features for Gloo Platform. Our requirements in our organization are fully satisfied by these features, so we really appreciate using Gloo Platform. Since I have been using Gloo Platform, I have noticed benefits from implementing API Gateway capabilities and controlling traffic routing. I can say that we are saving time, especially regarding control traffic routing, data monitoring, and improving observability of Kubernetes applications. These are the most valuable assets for our organization.

Read full review

LalitSharma4

VP at Coforge Growth Agency

Unified APIs have improved integration and security while monitoring and analytics drive efficiency

My main use cases for MuleSoft API Manager include integrating various systems MuleSoft API Manager provides excellent integration with any solution, and integration with third-party vendors is not an issue. I am satisfied with combining all APIs in one place, and the monitoring capabilities in…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Gloo Platform's features are optimal for my use case because I have numerous applications and microservices running, requiring rate limiting and traffic management integrated into one platform, which proves very beneficial."

"You don't need many frameworks or other things to run Glue."

"Organizations are highly recommended to use Gloo Platform because it will have a great impact on their organization."

"The most valuable features are API development and API management."

"When using the Mulesoft Anypoint Platform, it has a wide range of connectors that are readily available to connect with the multiple applications."

"This is a good API management product, applying the policies, doing the integrations."

"Offers good integration and flexibility."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager's most valuable aspect is it has plenty of features."

"Leveraging MuleSoft's Anypoint Platform allows us to seamlessly integrate across different systems within enterprises, enabling customers to extend their products and services to the market with seamless channel integration."

"The solution has been very stable."

More MuleSoft API Manager pros

Cons

"I sometimes face issues with integration."

"With respect to the live help, I have language issues because I can't understand some of the things that I hear."

"There is room for improvement in the automated access management area and in AI capabilities within the API Manager."

"I'd like to see improvements in API Exchange. Currently, we can only expose APIs publicly. I want to categorize some APIs and expose them just to internal stakeholders. It would be great if they could log in to a developer portal, see our current APIs, view Swagger or RAML docs, and try request-response payloads."

"In terms of the speed and process, I prefer Message Broker, ACE technology IIB. In my current project, we are processing 25 MB to 50 MB files, and Message Broker is able to do it, however, with MuleSoft it would take more time."

"The shift to a subscription-based pricing model has also introduced cost challenges, making it relatively expensive for some use cases."

"Migrating any existing middleware platform to Mulesoft is difficult because of the transformation, conversion and integration involved. Better tools are needed to achieve quicker time to market."

"I would like to see MuleSoft expand the range of APIs you can manage with it beyond HTTP, GIPC, and others."

"The pricing is a bit expensive. It would be better if they offered more price-conscious licensing."

More MuleSoft API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Anypoint is the most expensive solution on the market, as far as I know, though it's also the most capable."

"I think that it is pretty expensive."

"It's not very expensive, reasonably priced. There are no additional costs."

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as six and a half to seven."

"I'm unsure about licensing costs because I'm not the person who handles this. But, ballpark, it's probably somewhere around $300,000-$400,000 or something like that."

"The licensing model is based on how many cores are used. It is a very simple licensing scheme."

"The product is highly priced compared to other advanced software. It is affordable only for tier-one customers."

"The pricing is quite reasonable and affordable."

More MuleSoft API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Gloo Platform?

Since I have been using Gloo Platform, our features and functionality fully satisfy our needs, so I do not think there are any improvements needed for this platform. It is fully compatible with our...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gloo Platform?

I primarily use Gloo Platform to manage APIs and implement API Gateway capabilities, control traffic routing, and improve observability across Kubernetes applications. These are the main use cases ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Gloo Platform?

My advice to others is that any user using Kubernetes API gateways and API management will see improvements in traffic control. Organizations are highly recommended to use Gloo Platform because it ...

See all answers

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?

I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

When it comes to pricing, I find it always expensive. The pricing is high, which is the biggest point where some customers are hesitant about adopting it, and their deployment strategy is also more...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Gloo Platform

Compared 26% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Gloo Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Coralogix vs Gloo Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Gravitee vs Gloo Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Gloo Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Gloo Platform Competitors

Apigee vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 6% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 6% of the time

IBM API Connect vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform

September 2026

Download Gloo Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft API Manager

September 2026

Download MuleSoft API Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Anypoint API Manager

Overview

Gloo Platform is a versatile API and microservices management tool known for its robust security, seamless integration, and advanced traffic handling capabilities. It effectively bolsters organizational efficiency by improving workflows and reducing manual tasks through automation. Users value its support for multiple languages, comprehensive analytics, and its ability to enhance service mesh implementations for better network management.

Solo.io

MuleSoft API Manager offers a user-friendly platform with comprehensive integration capabilities, strong security, and scalable architecture. It's designed to streamline API management and development processes through robust analytics and a rich interface.

MuleSoft API Manager stands out with its lightweight design, offering extensive connector libraries and ease of applying policies via drag-and-drop functionality. Its robust analytics enhance operational efficiency. Users can implement custom policies, benefit from advanced integration needs like OAuth authentication, and manage extensive API inventories. While facing challenges like high costs and complex upgrades, MuleSoft API Manager is vital for managing APIs across sectors, supporting data exchange between systems such as SAP and Salesforce, and modernizing legacy systems.

What are the standout features of MuleSoft API Manager?

Lightweight Design: Ensures easy deployment and usability.
Robust API Management: Provides strong capability in handling API processes.
Strong Security: Offers extensive protection for API applications.
Scalable Architecture: Supports growth and adaptation to changing needs.
Comprehensive Integration Options: Facilitates seamless data exchange.
Extensive Library of Connectors: Enhances flexibility and connectivity.
Ease of Applying Policies: Simplifies management with intuitive drag-and-drop functions.
Robust Analytics: Aids in monitoring and operational efficiency.
Custom Policies: Supports advanced integration with OAuth authentication.

What benefits and ROI should reviewers consider?

Usability: Promotes ease of use for technical teams.
Integration Efficiency: Accelerates connections to essential systems.
Security: Ensures data integrity and protection.
Scalability: Provides potential for growing business needs.
Policy Management: Simplifies and enforces compliance across APIs.

MuleSoft API Manager is widely implemented in sectors seeking to integrate services like SAP and Salesforce quickly and securely. Its use in automating processes and enhancing API governance makes it a go-to API gateway. Organizations rely on it to modernize systems and manage interconnectivity, facilitating traffic control and robust policy management.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Coca-Cola, Splunk, Citrix, UCSF, Vertu, State of Colorado, National Post, TiVo, Deakin, LLS, Oldcastle Precast, ParcelPoint, Justice Systems, Ube, Sumitomo Corporation, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Groupe Initiatives, Camelot, Panviva

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager

September 2026

Free Report: Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.