GitLab vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

GitLab and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Tenable is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.6. GitLab holds a 2.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

20,902 Views
3,135 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

2,270 Views
1,771 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitLab

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the domain of software development and security. GitLab has the upper hand in pricing and customer satisfaction, while Tenable.io is preferred for its robust scanning features.

Features: GitLab is known for its integrated DevOps platform, facilitating seamless collaboration, continuous integration, and code management. Tenable.io stands out with its detailed scanning capabilities, thorough vulnerability management, and comprehensive security assessments. GitLab streamlines workflow collaboration, while Tenable.io focuses on delivering advanced security features.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users seek enhanced security scanning capabilities, better vulnerability reporting, and more robust compliance checks. Tenable.io users look for improved user-friendliness, seamless integration with existing security tools, and a more intuitive interface. GitLab has room to advance its security features, while Tenable.io could work on ease of use and integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is praised for easy deployment and integration into existing workflows with minimal disruption, supported by efficient customer service. Tenable.io, though more intricate to deploy, provides extensive support during setup, ensuring comprehensive assistance despite its complexity. GitLab offers smooth integration, whereas Tenable.io excels in supportive deployment guidance.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is commended for competitive pricing and a strong return on investment that resonates with users. Tenable.io, while being on the higher end of the pricing spectrum, justifies its cost with depth in features and security capabilities. GitLab offers a cost-effective solution, whereas Tenable.io appeals to those who prioritize extensive feature sets over cost considerations.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Harshal Deshmukh

CEO and Managing Director at Digidata Infsystems Private Limited

Simple tool to use, good dashboard capabilities and offers asset criticality ratings

It has good dashboard capabilities and gives good results with priority ratings, asset criticality ratings, and exposure scores for vulnerabilities. It also provides automated web application scanning, which customers appreciate because it doesn't disturb the web application or hamper the business. While testing the web application, sometimes it happens that the website or application goes down. But with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it doesn't affect the business. It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The code merging capability is something that we use very frequently."

"I like GitLab's security and SAS tools."

"If you want to maintain your issues in GitLab and raise your book of work and features, then GitLab is a great tool for collaboration and integration with code deployment and CICD pipelines."

"The most valuable features of GitLab are ease of use and highly intuitive UI and performance."

"The dashboard and interface make it easy to use."

"The most valuable aspects of GitLab are the ability to create branches, merge branches, and compare branches to resolve code conflicts."

"By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects."

"The most valuable features of GitLab are the CI/CD pipeline and code management."

More GitLab pros

"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."

"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."

"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version."

"The integration could be slightly better."

"The pricing has been substantially increased, which is a major concern."

"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."

"Reporting could be improved."

"GitLab should work on improving their user interface for GitOps as it is lagging behind."

"It has fewer options, and its UI is not so user-friendly."

More GitLab cons

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"The technical support needs improvement. Currently, it takes time, which might be due to the free version, but providing some level of support could encourage future purchase decisions."

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not sure if they have some kind of discount. I've been negotiating with them on prices before, and I believe they weren't too happy to give discounts, but list prices are $19 per user, per month for Premium and $99 per user, per month for Ultimate. So, the difference between Premium and Ultimate is a bit bigger, and in most companies, you need to build some type of business case."

"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"I'm not aware of the licensing costs because those were covered by the customer."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"GitLab is highly priced for smaller teams, but it's okay if considering a user base of thousands."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is okay."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Regarding improvements, making task management is something that GitLab can potentially make easier, similar to what DevOps or Jira does.

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 27% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 24% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 11% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

July 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

July 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.