GitLab vs Ixia BreakingPoint comparison

GitLab and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitLab is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #34. GitLab holds a 2.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

19,768 Views
2,965 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ixia BreakingPoint

Read 8 Ixia BreakingPoint reviews

788 Views
678 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Ixia BreakingPoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Ixia BreakingPoint and GitLab compete in the network testing and DevOps domains, respectively. GitLab appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features, justifying its cost.

Features: Ixia BreakingPoint is known for its comprehensive threat simulation, robust network testing capabilities, and security validation processes. GitLab shines with an integrated CI/CD platform, seamless code review tools, and project management solutions, making it an ideal choice for software development environments.

Room for Improvement: Ixia BreakingPoint users desire better reporting features, more frequent threat updates, and enhanced post-implementation guidance. GitLab receives feedback regarding the complexity of initial configuration, occasional performance lags, and a need for a more user-friendly interface to simplify operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia BreakingPoint is straightforward to deploy and is noted for responsive customer service, though users wish for clearer guidance post-deployment. GitLab’s deployment is intuitive for experienced tech teams but presents a steep learning curve, with customer support praised for its efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia BreakingPoint offers competitive setup costs with a clear focus on strengthening security infrastructure. GitLab’s pricing is initially high, yet users frequently report significant ROI through efficiency in development cycles, appreciating the long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (11th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (10th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Ixia BreakingPoint

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

34th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia BreakingPoint is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Sai Prasad

Staff QA Engineer at Virsec

Works better for testing traffic, mix profile, and enrollment scenarios than other solutions

Once, when I raised a ticket regarding a hardware or software issue, the solution's support team visited our company to discuss and find out ways to solve the problem. Sometimes, they asked us to send several photos from the back and front end to identify the issue. It was time-consuming as we were occupied with some other testing simultaneously. Instead, it would have been great if they could have visited our company and rectified the problem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important features of GitLab for us are issue management and all the CI/CD tools. Another aspect that I love about GitLab is the UI."

"Everything is easy to configure and easy to work with."

"This is a scalable solution. We had around 200 users working with it."

"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."

"I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software."

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."

"GitLab's best feature is Actions."

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security."

More GitLab pros

"The solution has many protocols and options, making it very flexible."

"The DDoS testing module is useful and quick to use."

"There is a virtual version of the product which is scaled to 100s of virtual testing blades."

"We use Ixia BreakingPoint for Layer 7 traffic generation. That's what we like."

"The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks."

"I like that we can test cloud applications."

"It is a scalable solution."

Cons

"The integration could be slightly better."

"Expand features to match other tools such as a static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required."

"The pricing model of GitLab is an issue for me."

"I used Spring Cloud config and to connect that to GitLab was so hard."

"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository. Resolving that issue would make the product better. My team quickly fixed it by writing a small script, then double-clicking or enabling the script to take care of the issue. However, that quick fix was from my team and not the GitLab team, so in the next release, if an automatic deployment feature would be available in GitLab, then that would be good because, in Visual Studio, you can do that with just one click of a button."

"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."

More GitLab cons

"The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint."

"The price could be better."

"The solution originally was hard to configure; I'm not sure if they've updated this to make it simpler, but if not, it's something that could be streamlined."

"They should improve UI mode packages for the users."

"The production traffic simulations are not realistic enough for some types of DDoS attacks."

"The quality of the traffic generation could be improved with Ixia BreakingPoint, i.e. to get closer to being accurate in what a real user will do."

"I would appreciate some preconfigured network neighborhoods, which are predefined settings for testing networks."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"I'm not sure if they have some kind of discount. I've been negotiating with them on prices before, and I believe they weren't too happy to give discounts, but list prices are $19 per user, per month for Premium and $99 per user, per month for Ultimate. So, the difference between Premium and Ultimate is a bit bigger, and in most companies, you need to build some type of business case."

"The solution is free."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"We are using the open-source version."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"or us, the pricing is somewhere around $12,000 a year. I'm unsure as to what new licenses now cost."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have a one year subscription license for $25,000 US Dollars."

"The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Regarding improvements, making task management is something that GitLab can potentially make easier, similar to what DevOps or Jira does.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 31% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Spirent CyberFlood vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 73% of the time

Defensics Fuzzing vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 10% of the time

More Ixia BreakingPoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

August 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

August 2025

Download Ixia BreakingPoint product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Corsa Technology

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

July 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.