GitLab vs Ixia BreakingPoint comparison

GitLab and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitLab is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #35. GitLab holds a 2.6% mindshare in SAST, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

3,342 Views
512 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ixia BreakingPoint

Read 8 Ixia BreakingPoint reviews

723 Views
17 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Ixia BreakingPoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Ixia BreakingPoint and GitLab compete in the network testing and DevOps domains, respectively. GitLab appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features, justifying its cost.

Features: Ixia BreakingPoint is known for its comprehensive threat simulation, robust network testing capabilities, and security validation processes. GitLab shines with an integrated CI/CD platform, seamless code review tools, and project management solutions, making it an ideal choice for software development environments.

Room for Improvement: Ixia BreakingPoint users desire better reporting features, more frequent threat updates, and enhanced post-implementation guidance. GitLab receives feedback regarding the complexity of initial configuration, occasional performance lags, and a need for a more user-friendly interface to simplify operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia BreakingPoint is straightforward to deploy and is noted for responsive customer service, though users wish for clearer guidance post-deployment. GitLab’s deployment is intuitive for experienced tech teams but presents a steep learning curve, with customer support praised for its efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia BreakingPoint offers competitive setup costs with a clear focus on strengthening security infrastructure. GitLab’s pricing is initially high, yet users frequently report significant ROI through efficiency in development cycles, appreciating the long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

Ixia BreakingPoint

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia BreakingPoint is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Sai Prasad

Staff QA Engineer at Virsec

Works better for testing traffic, mix profile, and enrollment scenarios than other solutions

Once, when I raised a ticket regarding a hardware or software issue, the solution's support team visited our company to discuss and find out ways to solve the problem. Sometimes, they asked us to send several photos from the back and front end to identify the issue. It was time-consuming as we were occupied with some other testing simultaneously. Instead, it would have been great if they could have visited our company and rectified the problem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of GitLab is impressive."

"I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand."

"Everything is easy to configure and easy to work with."

"GitLab's best features are continuous integration and fast deployment."

"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."

"CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the automatic merging of code."

"It scales well."

More GitLab pros

"The solution has many protocols and options, making it very flexible."

"The DDoS testing module is useful and quick to use."

"It is a scalable solution."

"There is a virtual version of the product which is scaled to 100s of virtual testing blades."

"I like that we can test cloud applications."

"We use Ixia BreakingPoint for Layer 7 traffic generation. That's what we like."

"The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks."

Cons

"I would like to see AI support in GitLab."

"I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors."

"GitLab could add a plugin to integrate with Kubernetes stuff."

"I used Spring Cloud config and to connect that to GitLab was so hard."

"I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands."

"I would like configuration of a YML file to be done via UI rather than a code file."

"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."

"We do face issues in our company when we run out of disk space."

More GitLab cons

"The solution originally was hard to configure; I'm not sure if they've updated this to make it simpler, but if not, it's something that could be streamlined."

"The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint."

"The price could be better."

"They should improve UI mode packages for the users."

"The production traffic simulations are not realistic enough for some types of DDoS attacks."

"I would appreciate some preconfigured network neighborhoods, which are predefined settings for testing networks."

"The quality of the traffic generation could be improved with Ixia BreakingPoint, i.e. to get closer to being accurate in what a real user will do."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"The price is okay."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"GitLab is cheap."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."

"There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that."

"We have a one year subscription license for $25,000 US Dollars."

"or us, the pricing is somewhere around $12,000 a year. I'm unsure as to what new licenses now cost."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Spirent CyberFlood vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 81% of the time

Synopsys Defensics vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 19% of the time

More Ixia BreakingPoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

June 2025

Download Ixia BreakingPoint product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Corsa Technology

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.