Fujitsu vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fujitsu Logo
32 views|12 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Pure Storage Logo
966 views|582 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu and Pure FlashArray X NVMe based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Fujitsu vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It stands out for its affordability and the ability to provide unified storage."

More Fujitsu Pros →

"Offers excellent features like efficient data reduction, a reliable SafeMode, and a great support model for continuous assistance and updates.""The most valuable features of Pure FlashArray X NVMe are its superior performance compared to other flash tiers, as well as its ease of use, with an intuitive user interface that is simple to deploy and use.""Pure has signature security technology, which cannot be deleted, even if you are an administrator.""The high availability of the product is the most valuable feature.""The duplication algorithm allows us to get a lot more use out of less storage. We're running a five terabyte array right now and we're running probably about 30 terabytes on it. So the duplication rate is pretty phenomenal, without a cost to performance. It still runs pretty smoothly.""FlashArray has some fresh efficiency features. I've never seen a storage solution with a compression rating this high before. It's at least 4-to-1 on Oracle databases. It's the best flash storage for Oracle.""One of the best features is the support, which is excellent.""It is very easy to install and configure. It has got excellent diagnostics. If you really need to see how the box is performing, the console gives you a lot of information. You can set thresholds as well as alerts based on the thresholds, which is a very powerful functionality. They are very proactive. They know how to monitor and manage the systems. They see a problem, and they are all over it before us. They see the problem before we see it, which is very good."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Pros →

Cons
"The graphical interface is somewhat lacking, and it doesn't cover all the necessary tasks, often requiring users to resort to the command line for completion."

More Fujitsu Cons →

"We would like to see VNC integration or be able to use Pure Storage with VNC.""In the next release, I would like to see real-time analytics for further insight into consumption models.""It's more multi-tenant functionality in their Pure1 manage portal that is lacking.""There is room for improvement in the pricing of the product.""You cannot tag a LUN with a description, and that should be improved. What I like on the Unity side is that when I expand LUNs or do things, there is an information field on the LUN. This is the Information field that you can tag on your LUNs to let yourself know, "Hey, I've added this much space on this date". Pure lacks that ability. So, you don't have a mechanism that's friendly for tracking your data expansions on the LUN and for adding any additional information. That's a downside for me.""Efficiency improvements would always be welcome, but I'm not sure if they could get more efficient.""They could add more support for file storage and different types of storage.""The tool's pricing is higher than competitors."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The entry-level midrange model from Fujitsu is cost-effective for our target market"
  • More Fujitsu Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "With Pure Storage, we would like to continue seeing price reductions with flash storage. I don't think we're any different than anybody else when we continue to look to the industry for price reductions of both NVMe and traditional SSD storage. We would like to see these prices continue to decline and erode, even displacing large spinning disks."
  • "We pay approximately $50,000 USD per year in licensing fees."
  • "With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually."
  • "Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD."
  • "As far as the licensing costs, everything is included in the license."
  • "They can tout the functionality and cutting edge technology that they have, but that's where the price tag comes in. The cost is high, but I think as they grow their business and get more customers that it will probably go down a little bit."
  • "Its price could be better. It is not too expensive, but it is the high-end cost. It is kind of a Rolls-Royce. You pay a lot, but you get a lot out of it. So, the price pressure on the way down would be great, but at the end of the day, if you need to do the work, you just pay for it."
  • "The licensing is on a yearly basis."
  • More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It stands out for its affordability and the ability to provide unified storage.
    Top Answer:The entry-level midrange model from Fujitsu is cost-effective for our target market. We acquire licenses and capacity for our required applications and features at the outset. Initially, these charges… more »
    Top Answer:The graphical interface is somewhat lacking, and it doesn't cover all the necessary tasks, often requiring users to resort to the command line for completion. They did not invest significantly in… more »
    Top Answer:The standout features for us in Pure FlashArray X NVMe are its robust DDoS protection, seamless transparent failover, and failback capabilities ensuring high availability.
    Top Answer:I would rate the solution as an eight out of ten in terms of costliness.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in catering to midrange storage needs, especially for customers seeking Enterprise-class features. We would appreciate a built-in transparent failover in the next release… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    32
    Comparisons
    12
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    788
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    966
    Comparisons
    582
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    383
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fujitsu is your single point-of-contact for providing comprehensive data solutions for various use-cases. By combining ETERNUS storage systems with products from partners and our services, we are successfully delivering end to end storage solutions for all data scenarios

    Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fujitsu vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fujitsu vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fujitsu is ranked 13th in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays with 2 reviews while Pure FlashArray X NVMe is ranked 6th in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays with 28 reviews. Fujitsu is rated 7.0, while Pure FlashArray X NVMe is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Fujitsu writes "Reliable storage solutions that offer an attractive balance of affordability and performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pure FlashArray X NVMe writes "Works well, is easy to implement, and has upgrade analysis capabilities". Fujitsu is most compared with , whereas Pure FlashArray X NVMe is most compared with Dell PowerStore, Dell Unity XT, HPE Nimble Storage, Pure Storage FlashArray and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform. See our Fujitsu vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe report.

    See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.

    We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.