Fudo PAM vs One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix comparison

Fudo Security and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #21, while One Identity is ranked #35. Fudo Security holds a 2.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,080 Views
1,069 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Privileged Acc...

Read 3 One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix reviews

276 Views
276 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

One Identity Privileged Acc...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Fudo PAM and One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix compete in privileged access management. One Identity appears to have an edge due to its extensive feature set and comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Fudo PAM stands out for its session monitoring, easy-to-use security configurations, and responsive accessibility. One Identity provides advanced policy management, extensive integration options, and a robust feature set. Its comprehensive adaptability often makes it the preferred choice for those needing extensive capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Fudo PAM could benefit from enhanced reporting and analytics, as well as more frequent feature updates and performance improvements. One Identity could improve customization options and streamline system updates despite already solid performance enhancements, which are appreciated by its user base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fudo PAM is recognized for quick deployment and strong technical support. Although One Identity's deployment process is longer, it excels with its robust customer service and thorough documentation. Both are well-supported, yet One Identity leads slightly in support comprehensiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Fudo PAM is noted for cost-effective implementation and rapid ROI, suiting budget-conscious organizations. One Identity, with higher setup costs, is seen as a valuable investment with an extensive feature set and long-term ROI. The decision often hinges on prioritizing immediate cost-effectiveness or long-term investment value.

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Privileged Acc...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fudo PAM	2.8%
One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix	0.8%
Other	96.4%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Hicham Barnoussi

Managing Partner at Smpl ID

A reliable solution with great password and session management

The setup process depends on the environment of the customer. It's not dependent on the solution. For customers with normal use cases and scenarios, it's a straightforward implementation, but for a customer with more than one environment, they may have BeyondTrust in one environment and Safeguard in another one. When they want to consolidate later, there may be complications. It depends on the devices and assets they would like to have under their PAM solution. The standard time for implementation is four weeks. I rate the setup an eight out of ten. There needs to be a dedicated resource for maintenance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"The most valuable features are session and password management."

"Privileged Access Suite's best feature is it's straightforward to use."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it is easy to use."

Cons

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"The stability is not very good."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"There is a new trend of not having any privileged users or accounts."

"Privileged Access Suite's interface could be better."

"Product management should be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 17% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 10% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 7% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

One Identity Safeguard vs One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix

Compared 39% of the time

Heimdal Privileged Access Management vs One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix

Compared 30% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix

Compared 30% of the time

More One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix report

Download One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

The Privileged Access Suite for Unix is a one-stop shop for UNIX security that combines Active Directory bridge and root-delegation solutions in one console. It extends the authentication and authorization of Active Directory to UNIX, Linux, and Mac OS X users consolidating and unifying identities. Plus, it assigns individual accountability, enables least-privilege access and centralizes access reporting of the UNIX root account.

One Identity

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

University of East Anglia, nForce Secure, dunnhumby

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix

January 2026

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.