We performed a comparison between Forescout Platform and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the Forescout Platform it's highly customizable and flexible."
"Forescout Platform has made it possible to block people working near our construction sites who should not have access to our network."
"You can quickly filter your view of devices and zero in on the ones you want using a variety of tools, such as what subnet it is on or what it has been classified as."
"The 802.1X compliance authentication feature of this solution is very good."
"Vulnerability remediation is valuable. We can narrow down a system and its properties. We can go granular on the properties of each endpoint, such as which operating system you're using."
"The visibility is the main benefit. We now know how many devices are connected, what the use for each device is and what kind of devices we have in our environment."
"The user management has been very easy for the most part."
"Emergency response, risk assessment information to get a view of the of the vulnerability."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"Forescout Platform isn't flexible with connections to devices like printers and forces you to re-enter details like the MAC address after any breakdowns."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"The system controls could be better."
"Initially, the implementation of the Forescout Platform took some time to figure out. The reason is we are a manufacturing unit and we have certain silos that are insulated areas where certain systems will not connect to the internet or to the LAN. Since there are many parts of it, we have to have an inclusive view of all those systems. It took a while for us to initially implement, but after a few months, everything worked well."
"Forescout needs to upgrade its development in the future."
"The initial setup was complex."
"It does not support the TACACS+ protocol."
"The ability to block external devices in Mac is lacking and needs to be added."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
Forescout Platform is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 69 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 14th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Forescout Platform is rated 8.4, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Genian NAC, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass and Fortinet FortiNAC. See our Forescout Platform vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.