We performed a comparison between Armis and Forescout Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security."Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"We think it's simple. We think it's very useful and we really like reports and everything."
"Forescout Platform's most valuable features are that it is very granular. We are able to cull out a lot of information about our particular device or endpoint. The configuration and the visibility are very seamless. Overall the solution is very easy to handle and it's very comprehensive."
"The most valuable feature of Forescout Platform is that it has everything that Aruba has at significantly less cost."
"Emergency response, risk assessment information to get a view of the of the vulnerability."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment, which does not require the use of an agent."
"The solution's implementation and operation are very easy."
"I have noticed that in the last year the license model has changed from licensing the whole appliance to licensing the number of devices. It's more simple for a large installation, or a user to have CounterACT as their peripheral site in the company. It's a good choice to have changed the license policy."
"Ease of deployment There's a great support team that becomes actively engaged whenever we encounter issues. Their technical support is amazing. Good documentation is available. The product is stable. The solution is highly scalable. I recommend using the solution because it gives verified control over the environment. It has a great visibility feature."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"Forescout Platform could improve the vulnerability management as well as the control on the endpoint, which needs to be connected to my network."
"It does not support the TACACS+ protocol."
"The licensing costs are quite high. With the amount of hardware we have, we need too many licenses to make the product effective and it's ultimately just too costly."
"If older network devices are used there can be some compatibility issues while using the Forescout Platform. Additionally, if the switches that are deployed in your infrastructure are not captured properly to the endpoints there might be some difficulties with Forescout Platform trying to monitor the network traffic. Traffic management is an area the vendor should work on."
"Forescout Platform sometimes returns false positives, so there's some fine-tuning to be done there."
"The system controls could be better."
"Forescout Platform's technical support is slow to respond and could be more knowledgeable."
"They should improve features related to IT security. ForeScout should analyze behavior to see if the behavior is malicious behavior and block this device. They should develop the ability to analyze the behavior of the device in my environment."
Armis is ranked 3rd in IoT Security with 1 review while Forescout Platform is ranked 1st in IoT Security with 68 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Forescout Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Armis writes "A straightforward and user-friendly solution that can be used for asset intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Axonius, Claroty Platform and Phosphorus Cybersecurity, whereas Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Tenable Security Center.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.
We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.