We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and OpenText Data Protector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We appreciate the user-friendliness and ease of implementation of the Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention platform. The availability of the vendor support team is an added advantage."
"The solution is easy to manage."
"Stable and scalable solution for data protection. It offers good technical support, and has no major installation issues."
"Forcepoint DLP's most valuable feature is that it provides complete end-to-end security."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it captures where the data is being moved."
"The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions."
"The most valuable feature is the endpoint DLP. It's specific to copying to the USB or copying to the internal storage in our office."
"We receive a lot of insights from this product."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."
"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The stability of the product seems to be quite good."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The initial setup process for the solution is easy."
"The reliability of HP Data Protector is the most valuable feature for us."
"I like that Micro Focus keeps a separate catalog of our data."
"What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."
"The solution's interface is still not user-friendly for some customers. So, its interface can be better."
"We faced some issues with the endpoint installation of the agent as it is not from a common ground."
"If you are a macOS user, there are issues in the area of USB control."
"The product is good, but the biggest issue is needing direct support from Forcepoint."
"The support could improve Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention."
"They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management."
"This solution has a tendency to provide false-positive results."
"The setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The graphical interface needs to be improved."
"The scheduler setup could be better. We are facing some issues scheduling the job based on our requirements."
"Micro Focus Data Protector must improve its overall evolution record. They need to focus on hardware based instant recovery, client recovery, and cloud ability. Now there is no cloud ability."
"We faced some certification issues after we upgraded to version 10.2."
"Faster VEAgent Restores"
"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."
"It can occasionally be inaccurate in its backup/recovery time estimates."
"People prefer Veeam because the interface is easier, and Data Protector is difficult in comparison."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 51 reviews while OpenText Data Protector is ranked 23rd in Backup and Recovery with 99 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while OpenText Data Protector is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Data Protector writes "User-friendly, competitive, agent-based, and easy to manage". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, whereas OpenText Data Protector is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Veritas NetBackup, HPE StoreOnce and Zerto. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. OpenText Data Protector report.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.