Flowgear vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Flowgear and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Flowgear is ranked #23, while Salesforce is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Flowgear holds a 0.3% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Flowgear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Flowgear

Read 7 Flowgear reviews

158 Views
25 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

916 Views
297 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Flowgear

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

MuleSoft Composer and Flowgear are both integration platforms with distinct advantages based on user reviews. Despite MuleSoft Composer's features, Flowgear stands out due to superior deployment and customer service, providing a better overall experience.

Features: MuleSoft Composer offers robust connectivity options, valuable for complex integration tasks. It also includes advanced security features and comprehensive API management tools. Flowgear features drag-and-drop functionality, real-time monitoring, and pre-built connectors, simplifying integration for users.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Composer could enhance its automation capabilities, simplify configuration settings, and improve its user interface. Flowgear could benefit from expanding its connector library, improving documentation, and enhancing error handling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Composer requires considerable setup time but offers strong technical support. Flowgear allows for quick deployment and provides exceptional customer service, ensuring a smoother experience.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Composer's higher setup costs are noted, but users find the ROI justifiable due to its capabilities. Flowgear, with lower setup costs and faster implementation time, delivers a quicker ROI, appealing to cost-sensitive buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Composer

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowgear

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

23rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th), Cloud Data Integration (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Flowgear is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 2.6%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Fulufhelo Sibei

DevOps Engineer at Astute - The Financial Services Exchange

Fast support, good data ingestion, and a nice UI

I am happy with the product. It has solved our business challenges. It is easy to integrate into multiple sources. We did have to use a data transformation tool which would take months to map and transform data that was being dumped into our secure file transfer. Previously, by the time we finished ingesting the data, it was no longer relevant. This has since changed. Therefore, there are no areas needed for improvement.

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."

"Great for data flow."

"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."

"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."

"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."

"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."

"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

Cons

"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."

"The UI could be improved."

"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."

"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."

"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."

"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."

"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 36% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 17% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 16% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 10% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear

June 2025

Download Flowgear product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

June 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

No data available

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

Flowgear enables companies of all sizes to increase efficiency and reduce cost by integrating their apps, services, API’s and databases. No coding with 200+ pre-built connectors, reusable workflows and APIs.

Flowgear

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Composer

April 2025

Free Report: Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.