We performed a comparison between Flowgear and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."
"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."
"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."
"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."
"Great for data flow."
"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."
"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."
"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."
"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."
"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."
"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."
"The UI could be improved."
"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."
"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
Flowgear is ranked 10th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews. Flowgear is rated 9.6, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Flowgear writes "Great features, effortless integrations and offers an enhanced experience for users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes". Flowgear is most compared with , whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Zapier. See our Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
