No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FlowForma Digital Process Automation vs Mendix comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FlowForma Digital Process A...
Ranking in Agentic Automation
38th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (66th)
Mendix
Ranking in Agentic Automation
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (4th), Low-Code Development Platforms (2nd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (11th), AI Software Development (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Agentic Automation category, the mindshare of FlowForma Digital Process Automation is 0.3%. The mindshare of Mendix is 1.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Agentic Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Mendix1.3%
FlowForma Digital Process Automation0.3%
Other98.4%
Agentic Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Use FlowForma Digital Process Automation?
Leave a review
Mitchel Mol BGS - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Blue Green Solutions
Has improved development quality and speed but has introduced persistent IDE slowdowns
In recent years, the IDE has been more buggy and slower, and although there have been more features added, I would like to see more stability, as some areas that used to work for a fairly long time are now slower in my development, which feels like a step back. I choose a seven mainly due to the issues we've faced with slowdowns and bugs during development, while runtime has been very stable, and the overall output on Mendix platform is still good; there is definitely some room for improvement, and I would probably have given it an eight or even a nine if those issues weren't hurting my developer output for the past few years. Overall, Mendix platform is stable, but the IDE could be better.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Agentic Automation solutions are best for your needs.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mendix?
I do not have much experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because the sales or business team usually handles that, and as a developer, I don't have a clear idea.
What needs improvement with Mendix?
I think Mendix can be improved by supporting automated tests more easily. For example, Mendix can add some IDs for each component to build the automation tests more easily.
What is your primary use case for Mendix?
I use Mendix to build a system about the consultation of APIs. We are using Mendix to build a system to check SAP, which is another system, and we use APIs to bring information from SAP to this pro...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Microsoft 2. Coca-Cola 3. Pfizer 4. Johnson & Johnson 5. IBM 6. General Electric 7. Procter & Gamble 8. Ford 9. Amazon 10. Google 11. Apple 12. Facebook 13. Netflix 14. Tesla 15. Uber 16. Airbnb 17. Adobe 18. Oracle 19. Cisco 20. Intel 21. HP 22. Dell 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Siemens 26. BMW 27. Volkswagen 28. Toyota 29. Honda 30. Airbus 31. Boeing 32. General Motors
Genzyme, TNT, Yahoo, Capgemini, Roche, D&B, Aegon, kpn, AZL, Sky, Arch, Penn State Univeristy, BancABC
Find out what your peers are saying about Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Microsoft and others in Agentic Automation. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.