Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Infraon IMS comparison

ExtraHop Networks and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #72, while EverestIMS is ranked #87. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews
  • 1,247 Views
  • 898 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Infraon IMS
Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews
  • 654 Views
  • 399 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024
```html

ExtraHop Reveal(x) and Infraon IMS compete in IT and network operations management. Infraon IMS has an upper hand with its rich feature set, making it appealing for perceived value despite higher pricing. ExtraHop Reveal(x) gains attention for its pricing and effective support structure.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers network performance monitoring, real-time traffic analysis, and advanced threat detection. It provides quick identification of security threats and anomalies. Infraon IMS provides robust IT infrastructure management, asset tracking, and integrated service automation.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop Reveal(x) could enhance integration capabilities, expand asset management features, and offer more deployment options. Infraon IMS needs improved user interface responsiveness, streamlined setup processes, and enhanced scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) is recognized for straightforward deployment and high-quality customer support. Infraon IMS offers varied deployment models but can be complex initially. Infraon provides excellent post-deployment support, aiding transition.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) is appealing for its reasonable setup costs and quick ROI, making it suitable for cost-conscious buyers. Infraon IMS, while more costly upfront, offers an expansive feature set that results in long-term savings and efficiency.

```
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Infraon IMS
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
72nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Diagnostics (12th), IT Operations Analytics (14th), Network Packet Capture (8th)
Infraon IMS
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
87th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (34th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (57th), Cloud Monitoring Software (48th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations0.6%
Infraon IMS0.2%
Other99.2%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Out West - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations
We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.
Read full review
Maharajan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization
The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Wire data analytics."
"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."
"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."
"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."
"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."
"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."
"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."
"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."
"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."
"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."
"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."
"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."
"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."
"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."
 

Cons

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."
"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."
"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."
"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."
"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."
"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."
"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."
"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."
"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."
"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."
"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."
"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."
"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."
"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."
"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."
"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."
"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Construction Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 32% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 17% of the time
ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 13% of the time
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 11% of the time
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 11% of the time
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS Logo
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS
Compared 33% of the time
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS Logo
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS
Compared 30% of the time
ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS
Compared 19% of the time
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS Logo
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS
Compared 18% of the time
More Infraon IMS Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
October 2025
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reportDownload ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report
Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS
October 2025
Infraon IMS reportDownload Infraon IMS product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Everest IMS
 

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?
  • Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
  • Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
  • Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
  • Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
  • Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
  • Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
  • Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
  • CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.
What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?
  • Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
  • Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
  • Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
  • Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS
 

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc. 
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Infraon IMS
September 2025
Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Infraon IMS
Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Infraon IMS report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.