Entrust Identity Enterprise vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Entrust and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Entrust is ranked #19, while RSA is ranked #24. Entrust holds a 2.1% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

1,624 Views
1,104 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Read 6 RSA Adaptive Authentication reviews

833 Views
733 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and RSA Adaptive Authentication compete in the field of identity and adaptive authentication solutions. RSA Adaptive Authentication is often viewed as superior due to its advanced functionalities despite a higher price tag.

What features are offered by Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is praised for robust security protocols, customizability, and a comprehensive feature set. RSA Adaptive Authentication is highly valued for advanced risk analytics, flexible policy configuration, and cutting-edge features.

What areas of improvement can be found in Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Entrust Identity Enterprise could improve its integrations, offer more intuitive configuration options, and address specific technical aspects. RSA Adaptive Authentication needs better documentation, enhanced user training resources, and improved user guidance.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Entrust Identity Enterprise generally has a smoother deployment process and supportive customer service. RSA Adaptive Authentication, while more complex to deploy, benefits from responsive and helpful customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is considered more cost-effective, with users generally satisfied with the return on investment. RSA Adaptive Authentication, despite being pricier, is perceived as worth the investment due to its superior features.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Authentication Systems

19th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (28th)

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Ranking in Authentication Systems

24th

Average Rating

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Adaptive Authentication is 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Entrust Identity Enterprise	2.1%
RSA Adaptive Authentication	1.6%
Other	96.3%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Directorc4e7

Director of Cyber Security at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We need better ease of use; the product is overly complicated

There are many use cases that we have defined based on our business needs Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features. The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated. It has taken years to implement. We used RSA…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"Entrust Identity Enterprise is a very mature product, it is very reliable and there are many use cases for which you can use the solution."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients, and we use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions."

"Once we started adopting these products, we've seen the fraud losses go down considerably."

"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."

"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens, which work the best for us."

"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."

"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."

"One of the most valuable features is the fraud detection capability with minimal friction in the customer experience."

"It has reduced false positives greatly in our fraud detection ability."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication pros

Cons

"It would be better if the on-prem Entrust Identity Enterprise solution could have the same features as the cloud version because the latter is easier to use."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"I think I would like to see them use more of our data, and give us more ability to control or configure how the protection patterns work for a specific business, and also provide more transparency into the methodology."

"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."

"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."

"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."

"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."

"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."

"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."

"It's an okay solution. It's just old technology and it's time to move on."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's worth the money."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."

"The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."

"Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."

"You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

27%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Comparisons

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Okta Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

CyberArk Zero Touch PKI vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 12% of the time

RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 10% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 10% of the time

ThreatMetrix vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 10% of the time

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

March 2026

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

March 2026

Download RSA Adaptive Authentication product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

No data available

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust

RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.

RSA

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

March 2026

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.