Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Entrust Datacard and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7, while RSA is ranked #27. Entrust Datacard holds a 1.4% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of RSA users who would recommend it.
Entrust Identity Enterprise
Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews
  • 805 Views
  • 383 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
RSA Adaptive Authentication
Read 6 RSA Adaptive Authentication reviews
  • 245 Views
  • 146 Comparison Views
71% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and RSA Adaptive Authentication compete in the field of identity and adaptive authentication solutions. RSA Adaptive Authentication is often viewed as superior due to its advanced functionalities despite a higher price tag.

What features are offered by Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is praised for robust security protocols, customizability, and a comprehensive feature set. RSA Adaptive Authentication is highly valued for advanced risk analytics, flexible policy configuration, and cutting-edge features.

What areas of improvement can be found in Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Entrust Identity Enterprise could improve its integrations, offer more intuitive configuration options, and address specific technical aspects. RSA Adaptive Authentication needs better documentation, enhanced user training resources, and improved user guidance.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Entrust Identity Enterprise generally has a smoother deployment process and supportive customer service. RSA Adaptive Authentication, while more complex to deploy, benefits from responsive and helpful customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is considered more cost-effective, with users generally satisfied with the return on investment. RSA Adaptive Authentication, despite being pricier, is perceived as worth the investment due to its superior features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise
Ranking in Authentication Systems
17th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (22nd)
RSA Adaptive Authentication
Ranking in Authentication Systems
27th
Average Rating
6.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Adaptive Authentication is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)
The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.
Read full review
Directorc4e7 - PeerSpot reviewer
We need better ease of use; the product is overly complicated
There are many use cases that we have defined based on our business needs Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features. The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated. It has taken years to implement. We used RSA…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."
"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."
"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."
"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."
"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
 

Cons

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."
"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."
"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."
"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"It has taken years to implement."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."
"It's worth the money."
"You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
"Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
"The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
"Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
47%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?
The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?
I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?
I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 19% of the time
Utimaco SecurityServer vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
Utimaco SecurityServer vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 17% of the time
Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 16% of the time
Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 12% of the time
Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 11% of the time
More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors
RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 100% of the time
More RSA Adaptive Authentication Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Entrust Identity Enterprise
June 2025
Entrust Identity Enterprise reportDownload Entrust Identity Enterprise product report
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
June 2025
RSA Adaptive Authentication reportDownload RSA Adaptive Authentication product report
 

Also Known As

IdentityGuard
No data available
 

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust Datacard
RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
RSA
 

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares
ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
Buyer's Guide
Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication
June 2025
Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication
Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.