OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and Elastic Security are prominent competitors in the security management category. Elastic Security appears to have the upper hand with its cost-effective open-source model and ease of deployment, making it attractive for smaller setups, despite OpenText's comprehensive features.
Features: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers strong integration capabilities, powerful analytics tools like the ArcSight Flex Connector, and seamless data source management. Elastic Security provides open-source flexibility, rapid indexing, ease of deployment, and valuable machine learning integration for real-time correlation, appealing to diverse data environments.
Room for Improvement: OpenText users suggest enhancements in tech support, high availability, and simplification of network modeling. Elastic Security needs better default threat detection, scalability options, and expanded pre-built use cases, along with improved integration with both legacy and modern systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager has a complex and resource-intensive deployment, often requiring on-premises setups, with reports of inconsistent customer service. Elastic Security offers a flexible model deployable across various clouds and on-premises environments, supported by an active open-source community despite its own support limitations.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is viewed as costly, with a complex pricing model impacting ROI assessments, though justified by its extensive features for large enterprises. Elastic Security is valued for its low entry costs and scalable pricing, offering a free open-source version, which enhances its appeal to budget-conscious businesses.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Providing necessary assistance efficiently.
The answers received are not always satisfactory, requiring follow-up discussions.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
It lacks some capabilities compared to other tools available in the market.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
The stability of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is not very robust.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
Elastic Security consumes a lot of resources, requiring a substantial deployment setup.
The integration aspect of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) needs improvement.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools.
Elastic Security is as flexible and configurable as Microsoft Sentinel.
Elastic Security offers advanced features such as machine learning and integration with ChatGPT.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
The ability to interpret data is highly valued.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Security | 5.0% |
| OpenText Enterprise Security Manager | 1.5% |
| Other | 93.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager enables real-time threat detection through scalable and adaptable solutions, integrating seamlessly with multiple platforms for complex security scenarios across different environments.
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive security monitoring capabilities, combining log analysis and incident management to enhance cybersecurity and compliance. Its powerful event correlation engine provides real-time alerts for rapid incident response. Users benefit from customizable dashboards and comprehensive log collection, making it a significant tool in the SIEM market. Flexible deployment options cater to both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprises in managing IT infrastructure and threat detection efficiently.
What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is implemented for monitoring critical systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory needs. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for forensic investigations and active threat management, serving as a central hub for cybersecurity operations across diverse IT infrastructures.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
