Elastic Observability vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise comparison

Elastic and Netwrix are both solutions in the Log Management category. Elastic is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while Netwrix is ranked #56. Elastic holds a 1.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Netwrix’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

8,436 Views
2,025 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Read 4 NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reviews

806 Views
451 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and Elastic Observability are leading tools in monitoring and security log management. Elastic Observability seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive analytics features.

Features: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is known for its robust compliance, detailed audits, and real-time security notifications. Elastic Observability offers analytics with advanced log searching, versatile alerting, and powerful visualization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise could improve in third-party system integrations, real-time alerts, and feature scalability. Elastic Observability users suggest enhancements in usability for new users, cloud integration efficiency, and overall UI intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is recognized for straightforward deployment and dependable customer service. Elastic Observability's deployment is more complex; however, its support team effectively handles intricate client needs.

Pricing and ROI: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers competitive setup costs with substantial ROI through its compliance functionalities. Elastic Observability, although higher in cost, provides ROI for data-heavy enterprises due to its extensive analytics capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Log Management

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

56th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (60th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 1.2%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Observability	1.2%
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Mohammed-Abdelalim

Assistant Vice President at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Has provided powerful customization for unique monitoring needs but needs more out-of-the-box capabilities

In my opinion, the best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations. The greatest feature in Elastic is the ability to customize. This is similar to my comments about customizable dashboards in Elastic because it's visible to the analyst. However, it's very great. Customizing these dashboards can meet the customer's specific use cases and specific stories that they have in their environment, their special environment that doesn't look like other environments. The dashboarding in Elastic is highly customizable to the level of logos. If the customer wants his company logo in the dashboard, it can be done.

Read full review

Jagganath Tendle

Senior Infra Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Great for PCI compliance but issues with stability and large amounts of data

I mainly use this solution to meet PCI compliance The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements. The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance. The correlation suite needs to be improved. I also think they need to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to deploy, and it's very flexible."

"I think Elastic Observability is already in very good shape."

"We can view and connect different sources to the dashboard using it."

"The solution has been stable in our usage."

"All the features that we use, such as monitoring, dashboarding, reporting, the possibility of alerting, and the way we index the data, are important."

"I recommend Elastic Observability for its completeness of vision and wide ecosystem."

"The most valuable feature of Elastic Observability is the text search."

"The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle."

More Elastic Observability pros

"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."

"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."

"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."

"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."

Cons

"The cost must be made more transparent."

"Simplifying the parsing of logs and manual efforts would also be beneficial."

"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."

"Elastic Observability is reactive rather than proactive. It should act as an ITSM tool and be able to create tickets and alerts on Jira."

"There could be more low-code features included in the product."

"The only challenging aspect for new users is often writing the query language."

"They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base."

"It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like network observability, package flow analysis, and device performance data on the infrastructure side."

More Elastic Observability cons

"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."

"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."

"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."

"The correlation suite needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"The product is not that cheap."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

"NNT's pricing is moderate - I would rate their pricing two-and-a-half out of ten."

"Consider both their on-premises solution and their hosted solution. Both are reasonably priced."

"We have selected a perpetual license along with support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

Devo vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Trellix ESM vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

More NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

January 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

January 2026

Download NNT Log Tracker Enterprise product report

Overview

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is a comprehensive and easy-to-use Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution for any compliance mandate providing:

Enterprise-class SIEM capabilities.
Compliance Automation.
User and System Activity Audit trails.
Network Anomaly forensics.
Proactive Threat Detection.

Netwrix

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Wonga, WHSmith

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

December 2025

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.