No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) vs Spryker Systems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearc...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (11th)
Spryker Systems
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
eCommerce Platforms (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

Mahir Selek - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Scientist at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees
Chatbot has handled large PDF search workloads and provides clear dashboards for daily work
Because I am pursuing a PhD and work under the university, my university has an agreement with AWS, which makes it essentially free and easier to use. In the AWS ecosystem, everything is connected and I can control everything without uncertainty about what is happening behind the scenes. However, when using Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service), I connected it to Google Cloud but I am paying separate receipts. Over the last two months in October and November, I paid two separate invoices that are not connected to Google Cloud, which I did not appreciate. Google Cloud has a nice interface that gives me full control of pricing and billing. I can see daily, weekly, and monthly breakdowns with bar charts, and I can track exactly how much I spent during any period. Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) does not have such a tool for billing visibility. Since I am handling significant amounts of money and am responsible for this task within my company, I have high expectations for pricing and billing transparency. I would appreciate the ability to set a spending limit, such as uploading 200 euros, and receive notifications when reaching 50% of that limit. These notifications could appear on the dashboard, in the application, or via email. It would be valuable to see a timeline of my spending. I would characterize the pricing as somewhat expensive. I did not use competitors extensively, so I may have a bias about this. The pricing of large language models is not expensive—I use Anthropic's Claude or Google's Gemini, which are state-of-the-art models. However, I am uncertain whether I have a bias about Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) pricing. It is not extraordinarily expensive, but when I compare it with the cost of using large language models or Google Cloud storage, it is quite expensive. A couple of days ago, the Elastic team reached out to me. We have been regularly using the service since April, and 10 days ago at the beginning of December, I deleted my hosted deployments because I did not like the idea of paying when I am not actively using Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service). They informed me that there is a serverless option available. Before Christmas, I want to try it to see how it works, as I am uncertain about the serverless concept and whether it will provide the same functionality that I use with the hosted deployment.
reviewer2807766 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Staff Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Composable commerce has supported complex ecommerce builds but documentation still needs work
The best features Spryker Systems offers, in my opinion, is that it is known as composable commerce. It contains numerous features and all the capabilities Spryker has. If you want to use it as a multiple system in a single place, that is the reason Spryker has much capability to achieve in the new AI era. If we want to use anything such as RabbitMQ or Docker, these are the capabilities Spryker has. I recommend Spryker for future clients as well. Over the last six months, I have found that Spryker Systems' composable commerce and integration capabilities have helped me because Spryker also has the capability with Docker. Using Docker, I can easily install Spryker on my system and utilize Spryker's multiple services such as queue services with a single click. I really appreciate that capability. Spryker Systems has positively impacted my organization as it is completely new to me. Right now, I am still expanding their features and exploring their capabilities. At an organizational level, I have found that multiple clients want a system that they can easily handle. Spryker is capable of doing it. At the organizational level, I have found many things that Spryker can easily achieve, and that is why Cognizant is ready to extend Spryker Systems' capabilities around their clients.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) is a wonderful solution for seamless implementation and maintaining its health."
"There have been quite a lot of good outcomes since using Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service); customers have been able to use their data much faster and more effectively, and it definitely stands as one of the best observability platforms."
"Scalability is valuable to me, as I have 50,000 PDF JSON files that contain my metadata, and I am really glad to use Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) for this volume without any issues."
"Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to move away from expensive services such as DataDog and gives us about the same level of service while allowing us to keep data for a longer period of time at a cheaper price."
"Spryker Systems has had a positive impact on my company because we were able to generate a significant revenue increase in our e-commerce area."
"The platform's composability is valuable as it provides a variety of extensions to interface with other solutions."
"Over the last six months, I have found that Spryker Systems' composable commerce and integration capabilities have helped me because Spryker also has the capability with Docker."
 

Cons

"Sometimes it gets tricky to navigate through the user manuals because there are different forms of links."
"Machine learning might be expensive for customers."
"The logging feature of Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) itself is pretty valuable, but we tried the observability module and some of the AI features. Those need improvement."
"I would characterize the pricing as somewhat expensive. It is not extraordinarily expensive, but when I compare it with the cost of using large language models or Google Cloud storage, it is quite expensive."
"Spryker Systems could be improved if we can reduce the complexity level."
"Spryker Systems is a good company with good customer support. However, there are also problems and setbacks from time to time."
"Spryker, even with its native features, often requires some development and configuration into the code, which is not straightforward in the beginning."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
30%
Computer Software Company
15%
Educational Organization
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Construction Company
32%
Insurance Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service)?
Machine learning might be expensive for customers. Customers take advantage of Elastic being open source, but machine learning is not available in the open source version. If a customer is using th...
What is your primary use case for Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service)?
I developed a chatbot with text summarization and question answering capabilities. I need to summarize multiple PDFs, and I have a database in Google Cloud Storage where I perform keyword matching ...
What advice do you have for others considering Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service)?
Some of my customers utilize Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service), especially in the private sector, but most of the government sector do not use it. Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) performs...
What needs improvement with Spryker Systems?
Spryker Systems could be improved if we can reduce the complexity level. The documentation needs to be explored more, and we need to reduce the complexity because Spryker works between multiple sys...
What is your primary use case for Spryker Systems?
My main use case for Spryker Systems is primarily for e-commerce. I use it to build new cases in the system as my client requires, exploring the features and conducting proof-of-concept projects ov...
What advice do you have for others considering Spryker Systems?
My advice for others looking into using Spryker Systems is that it depends on their requirements. If clients want to create a system that is large in scope and they want to expand their system, the...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Spryker Cloud Commerce OS
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Luigi's Box, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.