No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Kubernetes Everywhere vs Spryker Systems comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kubernetes Everywhere
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Managed Cloud Services (4th)
Spryker Systems
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
eCommerce Platforms (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Kubernetes Everywhere and Spryker Systems aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Kubernetes Everywhere is designed for Managed Cloud Services and holds a mindshare of 6.5%, up 2.1% compared to last year.
Spryker Systems, on the other hand, focuses on eCommerce Platforms, holds 1.0% mindshare, down 1.2% since last year.
Managed Cloud Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kubernetes Everywhere6.5%
HPE GreenLake16.3%
Everpure Evergreen One15.2%
Other62.0%
Managed Cloud Services
eCommerce Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Spryker Systems1.0%
Adobe Commerce6.3%
SAP Commerce Cloud4.8%
Other87.9%
eCommerce Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

ManodayAhire - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Reg-X
Modern deployment practices have reduced downtime and support efficient multi-app management
Kubernetes Everywhere offers features including auto-scaling, which is the best feature, as well as load balancing, ingress controllers, and the ability to host multiple applications on a single Kubernetes Everywhere cluster through segregation using namespaces. The commands are straightforward to execute, and it allows the integration and management of Docker containers efficiently. Auto-scaling is one of the features I use in Kubernetes Everywhere that made a significant impact, helping us with user distribution as the pods scale automatically without disruption as users increase, contributing to high availability and low downtime. I am using Kubernetes Everywhere with the GitOps approach, using Git as a source of truth, which provides excellent security and has made a significant change in our current infrastructure. Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing downtime. We have achieved almost zero minutes of downtime since implementing Kubernetes Everywhere in our organization after transitioning from manual deployments. Regarding cost savings, we were using multiple EC2 instances for different projects, but now everything is under one cluster, running as a pod and segregated by namespaces, leading to cost savings. For team collaboration, we are using different tools with Git as a source of truth, making it easy for developers to manage instances and gain insights efficiently.
AP
Staff Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Headless architecture has powered high‑traffic APIs and accelerated complex commerce projects
For Spryker Systems, there is one major issue I see. There are no peer groups or developer channels where we can post our problems. If we go with Magento and other frameworks, there are many developers available there. You can search on Google, and there are multiple solutions available. You can see the solution, apply it, and then determine if you are able to solve your problem. This type of community resource is missing in Spryker Systems, so they need to do a lot of work on their side. Some user-friendly features are missing in Spryker Systems. Right now, in the present release, they did some things, but they need to do much more from a normal user's point of view. Currently, Spryker Systems is only focused on developer points of view, such as how a developer can extend the functionality or inject functionality into the system. However, if we talk about default features, there are no features. For example, there is nothing for reporting, and if we go with the configuration, only basic configuration is available. No high-level or low-level configuration exists. For example, if we want to showcase something on the cart checkout page, you cannot simply go into the configuration and enable or disable things. These types of features are missing. If Spryker Systems works on these parts, then it is a very cool platform from a user's standpoint.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted our organization by enabling us to focus on cost optimization and making our applications highly available and cost effective, such as using features for automated staging environments that are only active during business days."
"Kubernetes Everywhere is a premier operational asset for modern multi-cloud architecture, delivering standard, predictable workload orchestration across any underlying hardware engine with minimal setup complexity."
"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization because the infrastructure, the deployment, and the management are very organized, and I do not have to worry about loads, server memory, or anything."
"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization because we do not require any tech background to make our web app work."
"We were able to save 40% of our time on deployments, and cost-wise, we saved at least 10% of the annual cost we spend on infrastructure."
"Kubernetes Everywhere positively impacts our organization by making it quite easy to deploy different microservices for different languages; we simply build the Docker container and pass it to the YAML, and if anything breaks, debugging is straightforward because we know exactly where the issue is coming from."
"Kubernetes Everywhere is a very good tool with most of the features taken from Kubernetes open-source, and it works really well, is highly scalable with very low latency."
"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization by providing lower costs, flexibility, and scalability."
"If someone has a big product, then they can use Spryker Systems there, and if they do not want to lose customers' sessions or lose their customers, then Spryker Systems is a viable option."
"From an extensive point of view or for a large project point of view, Spryker Systems is the best platform right now."
"The platform's composability is valuable as it provides a variety of extensions to interface with other solutions."
"Spryker Systems has had a positive impact on my company because we were able to generate a significant revenue increase in our e-commerce area."
"Over the last six months, I have found that Spryker Systems' composable commerce and integration capabilities have helped me because Spryker also has the capability with Docker."
"Spryker Systems is very useful as we can use it as a user interface and as an entire ERP or CRM system."
"So far, as I could see, Spryker Systems is stable in my experience."
 

Cons

"I can think of an improvement for Kubernetes Everywhere in that it should be easier to use from a developer's perspective, as it involves a lot of infrastructure numbers and DevOps."
"It only loses a small amount of points because fine-tuning network policies across very strict, air-gapped, on-premise boundaries takes extra upfront coordination during the initial discovery week."
"Due to poor planning of the application developers and resource management, I have seen crashes, downtimes, and performance issues."
"The ingress issue is the main concern for me because I continue to face ingress-related issues most of the time."
"At this time, I may not have any improvement suggestions; I want to explore more, so the features currently provided satisfy me, but if there is anything Kubernetes Everywhere can share with modernization, that would be great."
"Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, running a Kubernetes cluster can be costly depending on the use case; however, running on GCP GKE is cheaper compared to AWS, making it relatively economical in our case."
"Deploying Kubernetes Everywhere infrastructure is somewhat difficult because there are many components that need to be deployed."
"Kubernetes Everywhere is pretty good, but it can be improved in terms of reliability and speed because currently, it takes around two to three minutes to deploy my entire app, possibly due to the weight of the codes I have or some outages from the platform side."
"When we build a Spryker Systems application in our local environment, it is really painful as it takes a long time, and the build requires a high-configuration system to become executable in our local environment."
"Spryker Systems could be improved if we can reduce the complexity level."
"Spryker Systems is a good company with good customer support. However, there are also problems and setbacks from time to time."
"For Spryker Systems, there is one major issue I see. There are no peer groups or developer channels where we can post our problems."
"Spryker, even with its native features, often requires some development and configuration into the code, which is not straightforward in the beginning."
"In my opinion, there are no best features on Spryker Systems. It is a very complex system that uses hexagonal architecture and is very complicated."
"In Spryker Systems, the main issue is that connectivity is too difficult. If I want to make a small change, I have to pass code through three layers: Zed, Yves, and middleware."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Cloud Services solutions are best for your needs.
921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Construction Company
23%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kubernetes Everywhere?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing with Kubernetes Everywhere is based on at least five years of focus on cost optimization.
What needs improvement with Kubernetes Everywhere?
Kubernetes Everywhere can be improved, but it is fine as it is. I do not see any point to add. It is doing great as it is.
What is your primary use case for Kubernetes Everywhere?
My main use case for Kubernetes Everywhere is managing pod deployment and scaling. A specific example of how I use Kubernetes Everywhere for managing pod deployment and scaling is that we use Kuber...
What needs improvement with Spryker Systems?
Spryker Systems can improve with their setup functionalities, as it is totally based on the Symfony framework and vendor libraries. When we build a Spryker Systems application in our local environm...
What is your primary use case for Spryker Systems?
Spryker Systems is our primary e-commerce platform, and we have developed multiple applications including subscription portals, leasing portals, and billing and checkout functionalities using Spryk...
What advice do you have for others considering Spryker Systems?
I advise them that if they are planning to get Spryker Systems in their local environment or in their day-to-day practice, they need to use high-configuration systems and have a good technical envi...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Spryker Cloud Commerce OS
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CDW, Everpure (formerly Pure Storage), Aerospike and others in Managed Cloud Services. Updated: October 2026.
921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.