Telerik Test Studio vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Progress Software and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #24, while Microsoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Progress Software holds a 1.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,438 Views
892 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

1,835 Views
936 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and Telerik Test Studio are key competitors in the test management and automation sector. Telerik Test Studio seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features and advanced automation capabilities, despite higher setup costs.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools, supports efficient planning and execution, and provides robust tracking capabilities. Telerik Test Studio delivers powerful automation with record-and-playback, supports multiple applications and browsers, and offers versatile testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could enhance its deployment speed, reduce dependence on expert involvement, and expand automation support beyond Microsoft technologies. Telerik Test Studio might benefit from lowering setup costs, enhancing integration with third-party tools, and improving documentation for advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio provides a straightforward deployment experience and responsive customer service. Visual Studio Test Professional benefits from the Microsoft ecosystem but may require additional time and expertise for optimal setup.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is cost-effective for Microsoft-centric companies, yielding strong ROI due to integration benefits. Telerik Test Studio has higher initial costs but offers better long-term ROI through enhanced testing efficiency and coverage.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,089 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (24th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	1.6%
Telerik Test Studio	1.7%
Other	96.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."

"The interface is easy to use."

"The whole suite is made for .NET development."

"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."

"Searching is extensive and helpful."

"The stability has always been very good."

"This product is a nine out of ten."

"The performance of Visual Studio Test Professional is valuable."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."

"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."

"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."

"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."

"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."

"The product must provide more automation."

"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."

"The data flow can be improved."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."

"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"The pricing is expensive."

"The product is very expensive."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"The tool is affordable."

"There are two versions of Visual Studio Test Professional: Community and Professional. We are currently using the Community version, but if we start working on a commercial product, we will consider upgrading to the Professional version. We need to identify how we will proceed with our projects, and based on that, we will decide on our licensing."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

University

Marketing Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Performing Arts

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 5% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 4% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2026

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

February 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.