Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NICE CXone vs eGain AI Knowledge Hub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 30, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

eGain AI Knowledge Hub
Ranking in Knowledge Management Software
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NICE CXone
Ranking in Knowledge Management Software
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Workforce Engagement Management (3rd), IVR Systems (1st), Live Chat (2nd), Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Knowledge Management Software category, the mindshare of eGain AI Knowledge Hub is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NICE CXone is 5.0%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Knowledge Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Use eGain AI Knowledge Hub?
Share your opinion
James Arvidson - PeerSpot reviewer
A software that enables centers to operate more efficiently, increase the quality of every customer interaction, create new pathways to profit, and ensure ongoing customer-centric business improvemen
One of the best aspects of CXone is its omnichannel experience. It treats all contacts, whether phone, chat, email, or SMS, through the same system, allowing for consistent reporting and a true omnichannel experience. The platform is very flexible. You can customize it to do almost anything as long as it's based on logic, which has been incredibly valuable. In terms of analytics, CXone offers consistent, accessible data across all channels. In the past, different systems like Avaya for phones or separate platforms for chat and email made it hard to compare performance across channels. With CXone, you get the same data points across all interactions, making decision-making much easier. It also allows for deeper reporting, like IVR reporting, where you can see what options people choose and create custom KPIs for better insight.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Knowledge Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with NICE CXone?
We need more control over the AWS side of NICE CXone as that's the only area where we lack control. We should have more control over our AWS implementation instead of relying on connections and con...
What is your primary use case for NICE CXone?
We use NICE CXone for voice routing and we have our IVR on it. We utilize ACD, IVR, and many other features. In our current application, we have implemented almost everything available. We build ou...
What advice do you have for others considering NICE CXone?
We utilize the analytics tools within NICE CXone while also employing our own tools. We scrape our data and use our own analytics tools alongside NICE CXone's insights, which help inform our contac...
 

Also Known As

No data available
NICE inContact, NICE CXone Workforce Optimization Pro, NICE CXOne WFO Pro, CXone Workforce Optimization, inContact Workforce Optimization, CallCopy, Discover, VPI Empower, Brand Embassy, goMoxie
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
MoneyGram, Honeywell, Radisson Hotel Group, AAA, New Balance, MattressFIRM, Teleflora, Best Buy
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Notion, Salesforce and others in Knowledge Management Software. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.