We performed a comparison between EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA and ElectroNeek based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool follows a role-based working model to create things. It helps to track what others are doing with the system."
"Good email automation and XL automation."
"AssistEdge made it so that the reps didn't need to maneuver through 10 or 20 different systems. We tied all that together in the background, so the reps had a shared UI, and everything else happened in the background without their knowledge. When they were retrieving data, it was done in the background through automation and pulling up to that generic UI layer"
"The product's setup is straightforward."
"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."
"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."
"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."
"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."
"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."
"Lacks integration with third party tools."
"The tool's alternatives work on drag-and-drop functionality without creating custom code. We don't have an in-built queue system and use RabbitMQ for it. The solution also doesn't have a framework."
"AssistEdge isn't a simple tool like Blue Prism or other RPA solutions with configurable items that you can drag and drop. This involved a lot of hard coding, which posed two challenges. One, we did not have that skillset, so we depended on Infosys. Two, it's a beast to go back and update or make changes when things are hard coded because you can't just move those configurable items back around."
"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."
"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."
"Its price could definitely be lower."
"The solution needs to improve its stability."
"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."
"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."
"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."
"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."
EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is ranked 28th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews while ElectroNeek is ranked 20th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 9 reviews. EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is rated 6.6, while ElectroNeek is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA writes "The support team was great, but we had to rely on them too much because it lacks a drag-and-drop interface and everything is hard coded". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ElectroNeek writes "User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge". EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate and Pega Robotic Process Automation, whereas ElectroNeek is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Robocorp and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. ElectroNeek report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
