Corporate Development Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 24, 2025
Regarding the reporting capabilities of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA, I am not certain about the intelligent reporting capabilities available. EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is more affordable than UiPath. EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is majorly meant for mid-enterprises rather than actual enterprises. I would rate EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA a seven out of ten.
It's a simple tool to use, so it's basically personal preference. It's mainly useful for the automation of straightforward products. I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
We rely on Power BI for reporting. I rate the overall product a seven out of ten. It is good for automating repetitive or rule-based tasks, making it a great fit for many solutions. However, there is room for improvement when it comes to handling complex processes with multiple structured data formats.
Director Digital Customer & Digital Experience at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jan 3, 2023
I rate EdgeVerve AssistEdge six out of 10. My only advice is to do your research and think about how you plan to use the tool long term. If you want to scale up, pick a tool that can be scaled. You might want to pick a tool that's more configurable rather than a solution that's hard-coded. A large company will require some changes to all those subsystems every day. When you hard code something, you are setting yourself up to feel that in the long run. You will be constantly chasing your tail with tech debt and trying to update things instead of implementing new automations. We implemented our first set of automations with the rollout and felt like we were constantly playing catch-up to change automations we had already built to work with our systems that were also changing instead of implementing new automations.
Investor at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Feb 24, 2021
I would recommend doing a proof of concept and comparing this product to other mainstream products, like UIPath or Automation Anywhere, or another similar solution. I think it's worth doing a comparison of at least one other product for a particular use case before making a decision. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.
RPA automates repetitive and rule-based processes, allowing businesses to streamline operations and reduce human error. It integrates with existing systems to perform tasks like data entry and report generation without human intervention.With the ability to mimic human actions, RPA software enables organizations to optimize their workflows and boost efficiency. It is easily scalable and can handle complex workflows by operating continuously, unlike traditional manual processes. Users...
Regarding the reporting capabilities of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA, I am not certain about the intelligent reporting capabilities available. EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is more affordable than UiPath. EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is majorly meant for mid-enterprises rather than actual enterprises. I would rate EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA a seven out of ten.
It's a simple tool to use, so it's basically personal preference. It's mainly useful for the automation of straightforward products. I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
We rely on Power BI for reporting. I rate the overall product a seven out of ten. It is good for automating repetitive or rule-based tasks, making it a great fit for many solutions. However, there is room for improvement when it comes to handling complex processes with multiple structured data formats.
EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is faster than UiPath. You can create your framework and extract the tables. It is easy compared to other tools.
I rate EdgeVerve AssistEdge six out of 10. My only advice is to do your research and think about how you plan to use the tool long term. If you want to scale up, pick a tool that can be scaled. You might want to pick a tool that's more configurable rather than a solution that's hard-coded. A large company will require some changes to all those subsystems every day. When you hard code something, you are setting yourself up to feel that in the long run. You will be constantly chasing your tail with tech debt and trying to update things instead of implementing new automations. We implemented our first set of automations with the rollout and felt like we were constantly playing catch-up to change automations we had already built to work with our systems that were also changing instead of implementing new automations.
I would recommend doing a proof of concept and comparing this product to other mainstream products, like UIPath or Automation Anywhere, or another similar solution. I think it's worth doing a comparison of at least one other product for a particular use case before making a decision. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.