DX NetOps vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Broadcom and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.8, while Kaseya is ranked #58 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,522 Views
1,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

961 Views
788 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and DX NetOps are competing products in the network monitoring space. DX NetOps is often perceived as the superior choice because of its comprehensive features, which many feel justify its higher cost.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers an intuitive platform, comprehensive analytics, and network management simplification. DX NetOps provides robust scalability, advanced monitoring capabilities, and suitability for large-scale deployments.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse could enhance scalability, feature depth for enterprise applications, and support for varied environments. DX NetOps could improve deployment simplicity, offer more flexible pricing options, and streamline initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse presents a straightforward deployment model and is known for accessible and responsive customer support. DX NetOps involves a more complex deployment process but is complemented by highly responsive technical support and extensive resources.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse typically has a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, with a satisfactory ROI. DX NetOps, with a higher price point, reflects its feature set and reliability, offering positive ROI for those in need of advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (19th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

58th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Kaseya Traverse	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"A highly scalable solution."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"The solution is stable."

More DX NetOps pros

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

More DX NetOps cons

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 18% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 14% of the time

DX Performance Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

January 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

January 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.