We performed a comparison between Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and Qualitia Automation Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools."The pricing is reasonable."
"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is ranked 16th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is rated 9.0, while Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing writes "User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is most compared with Apache JMeter, whereas Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.