Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs Qualitia Automation Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Load Testing Tools (17th)
Qualitia Automation Studio
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (33rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is designed for Load Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Qualitia Automation Studio, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 0.9% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.
Load Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing1.3%
Apache JMeter11.4%
Tricentis NeoLoad11.2%
Other76.1%
Load Testing Tools
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qualitia Automation Studio0.9%
Tricentis Tosca14.1%
OpenText Functional Testing6.6%
Other78.4%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1631949 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect ICT at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up
It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.
SY
Head Of Solutions at Test Yantra Software Solutions
Testing automation solution that is scriptless and is competitively priced compared to other solutions
The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it. Within four weeks, my team was up and running. This was the shortest possible ramp-up that we completed in my entire career The integrations for this…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The pricing is reasonable."
"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
 

Cons

"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."
"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

LoadView Stress Testing
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College
Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, Perforce and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: February 2026.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.