No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs OpenText Documentum Content Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Genpact Cora SeQuence
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (35th)
OpenText Documentum Content...
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Genpact Cora SeQuence and OpenText Documentum Content Management aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Genpact Cora SeQuence is designed for Business Process Management (BPM) and holds a mindshare of 1.1%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
OpenText Documentum Content Management, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Content Management, holds 6.1% mindshare, down 12.0% since last year.
Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Genpact Cora SeQuence1.1%
Camunda7.2%
IBM BPM4.0%
Other87.7%
Business Process Management (BPM)
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Documentum Content Management6.1%
SharePoint11.7%
Alfresco6.7%
Other75.5%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1041942 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Good reporting, a very good dashboard, and easy to set up
We primarily use the solution for processes like preparing worksheets. It's essential to the human resource process like expenses and allowances The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good. The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more…
Ashish Shelar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Manager at IBM
Offers version control capabilities, easy to set up but highly-priced
The main thing is the cost. Most of the time, organizations move away from Documentum due to cost. It's highly-priced, and the support costs are high. Now, SharePoint and other options. Microsoft gives free licenses, so organizations mainly look for cost-effective products. The second thing is updates and patching. We patch very often, every six months or a year. We have SP1, SP2, and SP3, and then suddenly, it's moved out of support. That's the organization's main pain area. They don't want to keep investing from a storage perspective. The licensing model should be changed. The product itself is out of support. They have not considered it for AI initiatives. The new version should be on the cloud. I'm not sure if the new version of Documentum, xECM, is cloud compatible or on which cloud it is compatible, but the OpenText server itself is on a cloud, which would be beneficial to the business. And it would also be easier for migration.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I find the flexibility most valuable, and being able to connect and integrate with various systems, as well as being solution oriented, is valuable to me as well."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"In terms of sub-products/components, the most valuable features are definitely Content Server and DFC."
"It is quite good."
"OpenText Documentum is a robust choice for enterprise-level document management."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"It has the ability to categorize and search."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
 

Cons

"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The areas that would benefit in improvement would be the training information, the white papers and useful tutorials as to how to build these typical solutions."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"Documentum xCP 2.3 still has some drawbacks such as dependent filtration among multiple drop down lists in result list, unable to access all user tasks from all processes in user inbox, and unable to include task link in task notification mail automatically."
"The interface is not user-friendly, new meta data classes are not easy to create."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"OpenText Documentum has announced a new licensing model, which could be more expensive."
"It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad."
"It is quite an expensive product."
"The price is considered affordable now."
"The product is expensive."
"OpenText Documentum's pricing is good."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
7%
Performing Arts
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise28
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?
The interface of OpenText Documentum could be more intuitive; sometimes it is hard to find where the information is located.
What is your primary use case for OpenText Documentum?
We are using it to archive the information about our sales.
What advice do you have for others considering OpenText Documentum?
One of my colleagues has found some automation features. It is not my responsibility regarding security features; I am new to this job, so I do not have those responsibilities now. I am not using a...
 

Also Known As

Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite
Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade
Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: June 2026.
899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.